single-dr.php

JDR Vol.14 No.9 pp. 1154-1169
(2019)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2019.p1154

Paper:

Problems in Earthquake Resistance Evaluation of Gabion Retaining Wall Based on Shake Table Test with Full-Scale Model

Hiroshi Nakazawa*1,†, Kazuya Usukura*2, Tadashi Hara*3, Daisuke Suetsugu*4, Kentaro Kuribayashi*2, Tsuyoshi Nishi*5, Shun Kimura*6, and Shoji Shimomura*7

*1Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Research Division, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience (NIED)
3-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0006, Japan

Corresponding author

*2Eight-Japan Engineering Consultants Inc. (EJEC), Okayama, Japan

*3Kochi University, Kochi, Japan

*4University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan

*5Construction Project Consultants Inc., Tokyo, Japan

*6Eight-Japan Engineering Consultants Inc. (EJEC), Tokyo, Japan

*7Daioh Shinyo Co., Ltd., Kochi, Japan

Received:
April 5, 2019
Accepted:
August 30, 2019
Published:
December 1, 2019
Keywords:
gabion retaining wall, earthquake-resistant design, shake table test, trial wedge method, active collapse angle
Abstract

The earthquake (Mw 7.3) that struck Nepal on April 25, 2015 caused damage to many civil engineering and architectural structures. While several road gabion retaining walls in mountainous regions incurred damage, there was very little information that could be used to draw up earthquake countermeasures in Nepal, because there have been few construction cases or case studies of gabion structures, nor have there been experimental or analytical studies on their earthquake resistance. Therefore, we conducted a shake table test using a full-scale gabion retaining wall to evaluate earthquake resistance. From the experiments, it was found that although gabion retaining walls display a flexible structure and deform easily due to the soil pressure of the backfill, they are resilient structures that tend to resist collapse. Yet, because retaining walls are assumed to be rigid bodies in the conventional stability computations used to design them, the characteristics of gabions as flexible structures are not taken advantage of. In this study, we propose an approach to designing gabion retaining walls by comparing the active collapse surface estimated by the trial wedge method, and the experiment results obtained from a full-scale model of a vertically-stacked wall, which is a structure employed in Nepal that is vulnerable to earthquake damage. When the base of the estimated slip line was raised for the trial wedge method, its height was found to be in rough agreement with the depth at which the gabion retaining wall deformed drastically in the experiment. Thus, we were able to demonstrate the development of a method for evaluating the seismic stability of gabion retaining walls that takes into consideration their flexibility by adjusting the base of the trial soil wedge.

Cite this article as:
H. Nakazawa, K. Usukura, T. Hara, D. Suetsugu, K. Kuribayashi, T. Nishi, S. Kimura, and S. Shimomura, “Problems in Earthquake Resistance Evaluation of Gabion Retaining Wall Based on Shake Table Test with Full-Scale Model,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.14, No.9, pp. 1154-1169, 2019.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] Department of Urban Development and Building Construction, Ministry of Physical Planning and Works, Government of Nepal, “Mandatory Rules of Thumb Reinforced Concrete Buildings Without Masonry Infill,” Nepal National Building Code, NBC 205, 30pp., 1994.
  2. [2] T. Hara, H. Nakazawa, D. Suetsugu, K. Kuribayashi, T. Nishi, Y. Tadokoro, K. Miyoshi, and H. Zhang, “Field Survey on Damages of Gabion Structures Caused by the 2015 Nepal Gorkha Earthquake and Examination of Specific Measures for Earthquake Resistance Improvement,” J. of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. A1 (Structural Engineering & Earthquake Engineering (SE/EE)), Vol.74, Issue 4, pp. I_586-I_597, 2018 (in Japanese).
  3. [3] H. Nakazawa, T. Hara, D. Suetsugu, T. Nishi, K. Kuribayashi, K. Miyoshi, and S. Shimomura, “Experimental Evaluation on Earthquake-Resistance of Road Retaining Wall Using Gabion,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.13, No.5, pp. 897-916, 2018.
  4. [4] H. Nakazawa, T. Hara, D. Suetsugu, T. Nishi, K. Kuribayashi, C. Zhang, H. Hazarika, K. Miyoshi, S. Shimomura, S. Kimura, K. Usukura, R. Shibahara, and K. Tabata, “Full-Scale Model Experiment and Development of Evaluation Method for Earthquake-Resistant Road Retaining Wall Using Gabions – Process Until Application of the Proposal Method from On-Site Damage Survey in Nepal Site –,” Technical Note of the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience, No.426, 114pp., 2019 (in Japanese).
  5. [5] K. Watanabe, Y. Munaf, J. Koseki, M. Tateyama, and K. Kojima, “Behaviors of Several Types of Model Retaining Walls Subjected to Irregular Excitation,” Soils and Foundations, Vol.43, No.5, pp. 13-27, 2003.
  6. [6] S. Okabe, “General Theory on Earth Pressure and Seismic Stability of Retaining Wall and Dam,” J. of the Civil Engineering Society, Vol.10, No.6, pp. 1277-1323, 1924.
  7. [7] N. Mononobe and H. Matsuo, “On determination of earth pressure during earthquake,” Proc. of the World Engineering Congress, Vol.9, pp. 177-185, 1929.
  8. [8] M. Ramli, T. J. R. Karasu, and E. T. Dawood, “The stability of gabion walls for earth retaining structures,” Alexandria Engineering J., Vol.52, Issue 4, pp. 705-710, 2013.
  9. [9] “Section 5-2-5 Evaluation on Sliding, Overturning and Bearing Capacity of Foundation Ground,” Japan Jakago Association, “Guide and Commentary on Gabion Engineering Method,” pp. 95-106, 2008 (in Japanese).
  10. [10] F. Mori, S. Shino, K. Higashihara, and M. Matsumoto, “Earthquake resistant of castle wall with flexibility (Part 1: Outline of the project),” Proc. of the 39th Japan National Conf. on Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 1615-1616, 2004 (in Japanese).
  11. [11] K. Higashihara, S. Shino, F. Mori, and M. Matsumoto, “Earthquake resistant of castle wall with flexibility (Part 2: Result of centrifuge model test),” Proc. of the 39th Japan National Conf. on Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 1617-1618, 2004 (in Japanese).
  12. [12] K. Komanobe, S. Shino, F. Mori, and K. Higashihara, ”Earthquake resistant of castle wall with flexibility (Part 3: Comparison of the analysis and the experiment),” Proc. of the 39th Japan National Conf. on Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 1619-1620, 2004 (in Japanese).
  13. [13] Japan Road Association, “Road Construction Works on Soil, Retaining Wall Guidelines,” pp. 97-109, 2012 (in Japanese).
  14. [14] T. Ushiro, M. Ogura, H. Tsutsui, and H. Nagayama, “Enhancement of improved trial wedge method for nonlinear slide problems,” Proc. of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, VI, The Civil Engineering, No.602/VI-40, pp. 151-156, 1998 (in Japanese).
  15. [15] H. Nakazawa, T. Hara, D. Suetsugu, K. Kuribayashi, T. Nishi, K. Miyoshi, Y. Tadokoro, and K. Usukura, “Full-Scale Shake Table Test on Estimation of Earthquake Resistace of a Retaining Wall for Road Using Gabions,” J. of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. A1 (Structural Engineering & Earthquake Engineering (SE/EE)), Vol.74, Issue 4, pp. I_441-I_451, 2018 (in Japanese).
  16. [16] Department of Roads, Ministry of Physical Planning and Works, Government of Nepal, “Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Works,” ASAD 2058, 2001.
  17. [17] D. Suetsugu, H. Matsuo, H. Nakazawa, T. Hara, Y. Tadokoro, K. Kuribayashi, and T. Nishi, “Study on earthquake resistance evaluation method for gabion retaining wall – Part 2 Model tests of gabion structure –,” Proc. of the 72nd Annual Meeting of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 483-484, 2017 (in Japanese).
  18. [18] D. Suetsugu, T. Hara, H. Nakazawa, Y. Tadokoro, K. Kuribayashi, and T. Nishi, “Evaluation of earthquake resistance of retaining wall using gabions by laboratory tests – Part 2 Lateral loading test for model gabion retaining wall –,” Proc. of the 53rd Japan National Conf. on Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 1797-1798, 2018 (in Japanese).
  19. [19] K. Usukura, H. Nakazawa, T. Hara, D. Suetsugu, T. Nishi, K. Kuribayashi, and Y. Tadokoro, “Full-scale shake table test on evaluation of earthquake resistance gabion retaining wall for road – estimation of residual deformation and cracks occurred in the ground behind the retaining wall –,” Proc. of the 13th Annual Meeting of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering, P1-16, 9pp., 2017 (in Japanese).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Nov. 27, 2020