single-dr.php

JDR Vol.14 No.1 pp. 173-187
(2019)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2019.p0173

Paper:

Disaster Management Following Decentralization in Indonesia: Regulation, Institutional Establishment, Planning, and Budgeting

Danang Insita Putra*,† and Mihoko Matsuyuki**

*Faculty of Urban Innovation, Yokohama National University
79-5 Tokiwadai, Hodogaya-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 240-8501, Japan

Corresponding author

**Institute of Urban Innovation, Yokohama National University, Kanagawa, Japan

Received:
July 1, 2018
Accepted:
October 31, 2018
Published:
February 1, 2019
Keywords:
disaster management, decentralization, social network analysis
Abstract

A consensus has emerged that decentralization of the disaster management sector improves disaster risk governance effectiveness and responsiveness. While many researchers contend that decentralization creates institutional capacity building and disaster management regulation opportunities, few studies have measured or analyzed both decentralization and disaster management. We examined changes to the disaster management system and the opportunities and challenges arising following decentralization, as well as how vertical and horizontal relationships between government actors have changed in Indonesia. First, we found that decentralization had a positive effect on the implementation of disaster management with respect to regulation, institutional establishment, budgeting, and planning. Second, despite general improvements, challenges remain, including regulatory inconsistencies, a lack of funding and capacity for local institutional establishments, a lack of participation of experts, a strong dependence on the central government, and an increased corruption rate. Third, while a decentralized disaster management system framework has been established, the local government’s capacity and the overall network remain limited, with national institutions playing a leading role. These findings suggest that empowering the Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD) and strengthening the vertical and horizontal provincial/municipal networks of the BPBD would both enhance the disaster management system and allow local actors to play a more critical role in disaster management.

Cite this article as:
D. Putra and M. Matsuyuki, “Disaster Management Following Decentralization in Indonesia: Regulation, Institutional Establishment, Planning, and Budgeting,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.14, No.1, pp. 173-187, 2019.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] Y. Bae, Y.-M. Joo, and S.-Y. Won, “Decentralization and collaborative disaster governance: Evidence from South Korea,” Habitat Int., Vol.52, pp. 1-7, doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.027, 2015.
  2. [2] K. Baba and M. Tanaka, “Challenges of implementing climate change adaptation policy for disaster risk reduction – implications from framing gap among stakeholders and the general public –,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.10, No.3, pp. 404-419, 2015.
  3. [3] S. Jones, K. Aryal, and A. Collins, “Local-level governance of risk and resilience in Nepal,” Disasters, Vol.37, No.3, pp. 442-467, doi:10.1111/disa.12006, 2013.
  4. [4] N. Setiadi, J. Birkmann, and P. Buckle, “Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation: Case Studies from South and Southeast Asia,” Studies of the University: Research, Counsel, Education (SOURCE), No.14, 2010.
  5. [5] D. A. Rondinelli, J. R. Nellis, and G. S. Cheema, “Decentralization in developing countries: a review of recent experience,” World Bank Staff Workikng Papers No.581, 1983.
  6. [6] K. Matsui, “Decentralization in Nation State Building of Indonesia,” IDE Res. Pap., 2003.
  7. [7] A. Shah and T. Thompson, “Implementing Decentralized Local Governance: A Treacherous Road with Potholes, Detours and Road Closures,” World Bank Policy Res. Work. Pap., No.3353, pp. 1-41, doi:10.4337/9781845421656.00023, 2004.
  8. [8] J. Leer, “After the Big Bang: Estimating the effects of decentralization on educational outcomes in Indonesia through a difference-in-differences analysis,” Int. J. Educ. Dev., Vol.49, pp. 80-90, doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.02.005, 2016.
  9. [9] B. S. Sjahrir, K. Kis-Katos, and G. G. Schulze, “Political budget cycles in Indonesia at the district level,” Economics Letters, Vol.120, No.2, pp. 342-345, doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2013.05.007, 2013.
  10. [10] Kustiawan, “Otonomi daerah dan desentralisasi dalam bingkai Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia,” 2004.
  11. [11] B. Brodjonegoro, “Indonesian Intergovernmental Transfer in Decentralization Era: The Case of General Allocation Fund,” Int. Symp. Intergov. Transf. Asian Ctries. Issues Pract., pp. 1-34, 2001.
  12. [12] M. Samosir, “The Effects of Decentralization on Education in Indonesia: Education for All?,” Master’s Thesis in Public Policy and Human Development, Maastricht Graduate School of Governace, Maastricht University, 2008.
  13. [13] R. E. D. Darmawan, N. S. Nordholt, and G.-J. Hospers, “The practices of decentralization in Indonesia and its implication on local competitiveness,” Public Administration-Public Governance Study School of Management and Government University of Twente Enschede, 2008.
  14. [14] M. Sistiana and M. H. Makmur, “Derajat Desentralisasi Fiskal Daerah Kabupaten/Kota in Jawa Timur Province in 2006-2010,” Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Vol.12, No.4, pp. 277-286, 2004.
  15. [15] J. Van Rossum and R. Krukkert, “Disaster Management in Indonesia: Logistical Coordination and Cooperation to Create Effective Relief Operations,” J. Tek. Ind., Vol.12, No.1, pp. 25-32, 2010.
  16. [16] L. Government and A. F. Team, “National Agency for Disaster Management (BNPB),” No.24, Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana and United Nations Development Programme, 2009.
  17. [17] N. Sari, I. Noor, and W. Y. Prasetyo, “Pengembangan Kapasitas Kelembagaan Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Perizinan Terpadu (Studi pada Kantor Pelayanan dan Perizinan Terpadu Kabupaten Kediri),” J. Adm. Publik, Vol.2, No.4, pp. 634-640, 2014.
  18. [18] R. Djalante, F. Thomalla, M. S. Sinapoy, and M. Carnegie, “Building resilience to natural hazards in Indonesia: progress and challenges in implementing the Hyogo Framework for Action,” Natural Hazards, Vol.62, No.3, pp. 779-803, doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0106-8, 2012.
  19. [19] B. Brodjonegoro, “The Indonesia Decentralization After Law Revision: Towards A Better Future?,” Int. Symp. Fisc. Decentralization Asia Revisit., pp. 1-21, 2004.
  20. [20] K. Iqbal and M. Ahmed, “Disaster and Decentralization,” Carleton College Department of Economics, pp. 206-214, 2009.
  21. [21] BNPB, “Rencana Aksi Nasional PRB 2010–2012,” Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana and United Nations Development Programme, 2010.
  22. [22] L. S. dos Muchangos, A. Tokai, and A. Hanashima, “Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis to evaluate the stakeholders of a MSWM system – A pilot study of Maputo City,” Environ. Dev., No.24, pp. 124-135, doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2017.04.005, 2017.
  23. [23] A. Abbasi and N. Kapucu, “Structural dynamics of organizations during the evolution of interorganizational networks in disaster response,” J. Homel. Secur. Emerg. Manag., Vol.9, No.1, doi:10.1515/1547-7355.1975, 2012.
  24. [24] C. J. M. Groenen, N. T. L. van Duijnhoven, M. J. Faber, J. Koetsenruijter, J. A. M. Kremer, and F. P. H. A. Vandenbussche, “Use of social network analysis in maternity care to identify the profession most suited for case manager role,” Midwifery, Vol.45, pp. 50-55, doi:10.1016/j.midw.2016.12.007, 2017.
  25. [25] J. Lienert, F. Schnetzer, and K. Ingold, “Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes,” J. Environ. Manage., Vol.125, pp. 134-148, doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.052, 2013.
  26. [26] M. B. F. Bisri, “Examining Inter-organizational Network during Emergency Response of West Java Earthquake 2009, Indonesia,” Procedia Environ. Sci., Vol.17, pp. 889-898, doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.107, 2013.
  27. [27] M. B. F. Bisri, “Comparative study on inter-organizational cooperation in disaster situations and impact on humanitarian aid operations,” J. Int. Humanit. Action, Vol.1, No.1, p. 8, doi:10.1186/s41018-016-0008-6, 2016.
  28. [28] J. A. Lassa, “Post disaster governance, complexity and network theory: Evidence from Aceh, Indonesia After the Indian Ocean Tsunami 2004,” PLoS Curr., Vol.7, doi:10.1371/4f7972ecec1b6, 2015.
  29. [29] M. P. Rombach, M. A. Porter, J. H. Fowler, and P. J. Mucha, “Core-Periphery Structure in Networks,” SIAM J. on Applied Mathematics, Vol.74, No.1, pp. 167-190, doi:10.1137/120881683, 2012.
  30. [30] E. Swyngedouw, “Globalisation or ‘Glocalisation’? Networks, Territories and Rescaling,” Cambridge Review of Int. Affairs, Vol.17, No.1, pp. 25-48, 2004.
  31. [31] S. Kahkonen and A. Lanyi, “Decentralization and governance: does decentralization improve public service delivery?,” World Bank Notes, No.55, pp. 54-56, 2001.
  32. [32] P. Bardhan, “Decentralization of Governance and Development,” J. Econ. Perspect., Vol.16, No.4, pp. 185-205, doi:10.1257/089533002320951037, 2002.
  33. [33] A. C. Chu and C. C. Yang, “Fiscal centralization versus decentralization: Growth and welfare effects of spillovers, Leviathan taxation, and capital mobility,” J. Urban Econ., Vol.71, No.2, pp. 177-188, doi:10.1016/j.jue.2011.10.003, 2012.
  34. [34] S. Blackburn, “The politics of scale and disaster risk governance: Barriers to decentralisation in Portland, Jamaica,” Geoforum, Vol.52, pp. 101-112, doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.013, 2014.
  35. [35] P. A. Saavedra-Costas, “A Study of the Impact of Decentralization on Access to Service Delivery,” Ph.D. Thesis, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies and the School of Public Policy, Georgia State University and Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009.
  36. [36] S. Ainuddin and J. K. Routray, “Institutional framework, key stakeholders and community preparedness for earthquake induced disaster management in Balochistan,” Disaster Prev. Manag. Int. J., Vol.21, No.1, pp. 22-36, doi:10.1108/09653561211202683, 2012.
  37. [37] A. Rumbach, “Decentralization and small cities: Towards more effective urban disaster governance?,” Habitat Int., Vol.52, pp. 35-42, doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.026, 2016.
  38. [38] D. Marks and L. Lebel, “Disaster Governance and the Scalar Politics of Incomplete Decentralization: Fragmented and Contested Responses to the 2011 Floods in Central Thailand,” Habitat Int., Vol.52, pp. 57-66, doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.024, 2016.
  39. [39] U. Sharma, A. Scolobig, and A. Patt, “The effects of decentralization on the production and use of risk assessment: Insights from landslide management in India and Italy,” Nat. Hazards, Vol.64, No.2, pp. 1357-1371, doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0300-8, 2012.
  40. [40] S. Rao, “Disaster risk governance at national and sub-national levels,” GSDRC Publications, 2013.
  41. [41] E. Anantasari, M. Daly, P. Glassey, E. Grace, M. Coomer, and R. Woods, “Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) Capacity and Capability of Local Government in Indonesia,” Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia, Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54466-3, 2017.
  42. [42] J. A. Lassa, “Institutional Vulnerability and Governance of Disaster Risk Reduction: Macro, Meso and Micro Scale Assessment,” Hohen Landwirtschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Bonn, 2011.
  43. [43] Center for Excellence in Disaster Management and Humanitarian Assistance (CFE-DMHA), “Indonesia: Disaster Management Reference Handbook 2015,” Center for Excellence in Disaster Management & Humanitarian Assistance, 2015.
  44. [44] Bappenas, “Membangun Ketangguhan Bangsa,” Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, 2014.
  45. [45] S. Hallegatte, “The Indirect Cost of Natural Disasters and an Economic Definition of Macroeconomic Resilience,” Policy Research Working Paper, 2015.
  46. [46] UNISDR, “Progress and challenges in disaster risk reduction: a contribution towards the development of policy indicators for the post-2015 framework for disaster risk reduction,” United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, 2014.
  47. [47] M. Agung, “Informasi Perkara Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia,” Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/id [accessed July 20, 2017]
  48. [48] Y. Zhao, “Social networks and reduction of risk in disasters: An example of Wenchuan earthquake,” Economic Stress, Human Capital, and Families in Asia, pp. 171-182, 2013.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Aug. 21, 2019