JDR Vol.13 No.2 pp. 245-253
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2018.p0245


Selection of Tsunami Observation Points Suitable for Database-Driven Prediction

Junichi Taniguchi*1,†, Kyohei Tagawa*1, Masashi Yoshikawa*2, Yasuhiko Igarashi*3, Tsuneo Ohsumi*4, Hiroyuki Fujiwara*4, Takane Hori*5, Masato Okada*6, and Toshitaka Baba*1

*1Graduate School of Science and Technology, Tokushima University
2-1 Minamijosanjima, Tokushima, Tokushima 770-8506, Japan

Corresponding author

*2Graduate School of Frontier Science, Tokyo University, Chiba, Japan

*3Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama, Japan

*4National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience, Ibaraki, Japan

*5Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Kanagawa, Japan

*6The University of Tokyo, Chiba, Japan

October 31, 2017
January 5, 2018
Online released:
March 19, 2018
March 20, 2018
tsunami prediction, tsunami database, simulated annealing

During the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011, real-time estimate of the earthquake’s magnitude was quite low, and consequently, the first report about the tsunami also understated its severity. To solve this issue, some proposed a massive overhaul of Japan’s offshore tsunami observation networks and methods to predict tsunamis in real time. In this study, we built a database containing 3,967 scenarios of tsunamis caused by earthquakes with hypocenters along the Nankai Trough, and tested a tsunami prediction method that uses this database along with offshore tsunami observation networks. Thus, we found that an uneven distribution of observation points had a negative effect on predictive accuracy. We then used simulated annealing to select the observation points to be used at each observation site and found that the predictive accuracy improved while using a few selected observation points compared to using every point.

  1. [1] Central Disaster Management Council, “Report of the Committee for Technical Investigation on Countermeasures for Earthquakes and Tsunami Based on the Learned from the “2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake”,” [accessed Aug. 30, 2017]
  2. [2] H. Tatehata, “The new tsunami warning system of the Japan Meteorological Agency,” Perspectives on Tsunami Hazard Reduction, Observations, Theory and Planning, pp. 175-188, 1997 (also in Sci. Tsunami Hazards, Vol.16, pp. 39-49, 1997).
  3. [3] Japan Meteorological Agency, “How to predict a tsunami,” [in Japanese, accessed Aug. 30, 2017]
  4. [4] Japan Meteorological Agency, “Improvement of tsunami warning system based on damage of tsunami caused by Tohoku Region Pacific Offshore Earthquake,” [in Japanese, accessed Aug. 30, 2017]
  5. [5] S. Koshimura, R. Hino, Y. Ohta, H. Kobayashi, A. Musa, and Y. Murashima, “Real-time tsunami inundation forecasting and damage mapping towards enhancing tsunami disaster resiliency. American Geophysical Union,” Fall Meeting 2014, Abstracts, NH23B-05, 2014.
  6. [6] T. Kanazawa, K. Uehira, M. Mochizuki, T. Shinbo, H. Fujimoto, S. Noguchi, T. Kunugi, K. Shiomi, S. Aoi, T. Matsumoto, S. Sekiguchi, and Y. Okada, “S-NET Project, Cabled Observation Network for Earthquakes and Tsunamis,” SubOptic 2016, WE2B.3, 2016.
  7. [7] Y. Kaneda, K. Kawaguchi, E. Araki, A. Sakuma, H. Matsumoto, T. Nakamura, S. Kamiya, K. Ariyoshi, T. Baba, M. Ohori, and T. Hori, “Dense Ocean floor Network for Earthquakes and Tsunamis (DONET) – Development and Data application for the mega thrust earthquakes around the Nankai Trough,” American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2009, Abstracts, S53A-1453, 2009.
  8. [8] T. Nagai, “Development and improvement of the Japanese coastal wave observation network (NOWPHAS),” Journal of JSCE, No.609(VI-41), pp. 1-14, 1998 (in Japanese).
  9. [9] N. Takahashi, K. Imai, M. Ishibashi, K. Sueki, R. Obayashi, T. Tanabe, F. Tamazawa, T. Baba, and Y. Kaneda, “Real-Time Tsunami Prediction System Using DONET,” Journal of Disaster Research, Vol.12, No.4, pp. 766- 774, 2014.
  10. [10] N. Yamamoto, S. Aoi, K. Hirata, W. Suzuki, T. Kunugi, and H. Nakamura, “Multi-index method using offshore ocean-bottom pressure data for real-time tsunami forecast,” Earth, Planets and Space, Vol.68, No.1, id.128, 2016.
  11. [11] T. Baba, N. Takahashi, and Y. Kaneda, “Near-field tsunami amplification factors in the Kii Peninsula Japan for Dense Oceanfloor Network for Earthquakes and Tsunami (DONET),” Marine Geophysical Research, Vol.35, No.3, pp. 319-325, 2014.
  12. [12] Y. Igarashi, T. Hori, S. Murata, K. Sato, T. Baba, and M. Okada, “Maximum tsunami height prediction using pressure gauge data by Gaussian process at Owase in the Kii Peninsula,” Japan, Marine Geophysical Research, Vol.37, No.4, pp. 361-370, 2016.
  13. [13] The Headquarters For Earthquake Research Promotion, “Long term evaluation of seismic activity of the Nankai Trough (2nd edition),” [in Japanese, accessed Oct. 16, 2017]
  14. [14] K. Hirata, H. Fujiwara, H. Nakamura, M. Osada, T. Ohsumi, N. Morikawa, S. Kawai, T. Maeda, H. Matsuyama, N. Toyama, T. Kito, Y. Murashima, Y. Murata, T. Inouse, R. Saito, S. Akiyama, M. Korenaga, Y. Abe, N. Hashimoto, and T. Hakamata, “Integrated Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Assessment against possible tsunamis along Nankai Trough,” Sagami Trough, and Japan Trench, IASPEI Symposia, S23-P-11, 2017.
  15. [15] The Headquarters For Earthquake Research Promotion, “Tsunami prediction method for earthquakes with specified source faults “Tsunami Recipe”,” 2017, [in Japanese, accessed Aug. 30, 2017]
  16. [16] N. Toyama, K. Hirata, H. Fujiwara, H. Nakamura, N. Morikawa, M. Osada, H. Matsuyama, T. Kito, Y. Murashima, and S. Akiyama, “A set of characterized earthquake fault models for the probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment in the Nankai Trough,” Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2015, Abstracts, HDS27-20, 2015 (in Japanese).
  17. [17] Y. Okada, “Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults In a half-space,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol.75, No.4, pp. 1135-1154, 1985.
  18. [18] Y. Tanioka and K. Satake, “Tsunami generation by horizontal displacement of ocean bottom,” Geophysical Research Letters, Vol.23, No.8, pp. 861-864, 1996.
  19. [19] K. Kajiura, “The leading wave of a tsunami,” Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, Vol.41, pp. 535-571, 1963.
  20. [20] T. Baba, N. Takahashi, Y. Kaneda, K. Ando, D. Matsuoka, and T. Kato, “Parallel implementation of dispersive tsunami wave modelingwith a nesting algorithm for the 2011 Tohoku tsunami,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, Vol.172, No.12, pp. 3455-3472, 2015.
  21. [21] D. S. Johnson, C. R. Argon, L. A. McGeoch, and C. Schevon, “Optimization by Simulated Annealing: An Experimental Evaluation; Part I,” Graph Partitioning, Operations Research, Vol.37, No.6, pp. 865-892, 1989.
Cite this article as:
Junichi Taniguchi, Kyohei Tagawa, Masashi Yoshikawa, Yasuhiko Igarashi, Tsuneo Ohsumi, Hiroyuki Fujiwara, Takane Hori, Masato Okada, and Toshitaka Baba, “Selection of Tsunami Observation Points Suitable for Database-Driven Prediction,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.13, No.2, pp. 245-253, 2018
Junichi Taniguchi, Kyohei Tagawa, Masashi Yoshikawa, Yasuhiko Igarashi, Tsuneo Ohsumi, Hiroyuki Fujiwara, Takane Hori, Masato Okada, and Toshitaka Baba, J. Disaster Res., Vol.13, No.2, pp. 245-253, 2018

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Jun. 22, 2018