single-dr.php

JDR Vol.11 No.3 pp. 413-420
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2016.p0413
(2016)

Survey Report:

Collaborative, Science-Based, Public Disaster Communication – The NHK Media Technology 3D Documentary Movie on Japan’s 2011 Tsunami Event

Natsuko Chubachi, Michihiro Chikata, Kiyoshi Ito, and Fumihiko Imamura

International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University
468-1 Aza-Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

Received:
September 1, 2015
Accepted:
February 19, 2016
Published:
June 1, 2016
Keywords:
tsunami, disaster risk reduction, publicity, media-academia collaboration, 3D documentary movie
Abstract

A 3D documentary movie, “The Great Tsunami in Japan: Reflecting on the 2011 Disaster,” was produced and screened as a collaboration between the academic community and the media in order to communicate lessons from the tsunami that accompanied the Great East Japan Earthquake. The movie was first shown in March 2015 at the Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction. This article discusses issues and outcomes of the collaboration in terms of the publicity activities of disaster research. An analysis of comments from viewers, Japanese and overseas guests alike, revealed a generally high evaluation of the film. The following outcomes were noted: 1) a large and varied audience, 2) the communication of academic information to members of the general public with no apparent resistance from them, and 3) an impressive presentation of the event, the subsequent reconstruction works, and the importance of keeping the memory of the disaster alive. Future issues will include deeper collaboration between the academic community and the media for disaster risk reduction purposes as well as studies on how such 3D images and movies can affect the passing down of memories of the disaster.

References
  1. [1] M. Tanaka, “Kagaku gijutsu wo meguru comyunikeeshon no isou to giron (Phases and discussions of cummunication regarding science technology),” in Posuto 3.11 no kagaku to seiji (Post-3.11 science and politics), Nakanishiya, pp. 123-175, 2013.
  2. [2] Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, “Kagaku gijutsu hakusho (White paper on sicence and technology),” Fiscal Year 2012, http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/hakusho/html/hpaa201201/detail/1322246.htm [accessed January 31, 2016]
  3. [3] Science Council of Japan, “Kagakusha kara shakaihe no jouhouhasshin no arikata ni tsuite (Reviewing information transmission from scientists to society),” January 2014, http://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/kohyo/pdf/kohyo-22-h140204.pdf [accessed August 30, 2015]
  4. [4] N. Shuto, C. Goto, and F. Imamura, “Numerical simulation as a means of warning for near-field tsunami,” Coastal Eng. in Japan, Vol.33 No.2, pp.173-193, 1990.
  5. [5] F. Imamura and C. Goto, “Truncation error in numerical tsunami simulation by the finite difference method,” Coastal Eng. in Japan, Vol.31 No.2, pp. 245-263, 1988.
  6. [6] N. Shuto, T. Miyamura, K. Mushiake, S. Sasamoto, Y. Kawata, and Y. Igarashi, “Saigai tahatsu chitai no ‘saigai bunka’ ni kansuru kenkyu (Research on ‘disaster culture’ in disaster-prone area),” Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Reseach, Fiscal Year 1990, https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/d/p/02201107/1990/3/ja.ja.html [accessed August 28, 2015]
  7. [7] F. Imamura and T. Hiraishi, “Study on recognition of natural hazards and application to the virtual reality system,” Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Fiscal Years from 1998 to 2001, https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/d/p/10680444.en.html [accessed August 28, 2015]
  8. [8] K. Minoura, F. Imamura, D. Sugawara, Y. Kono, and T. Iwasaki, “The 869 Jogan tsunami deposit and recurrence interval of large-scale tsunami on the Pacific coast of northeast Japan,” J. Natural Disaster Science, Vol.23, No.2, pp. 83-88, 2002.
  9. [9] K. Minoura, “Tsunami saigai ha kurikaesu (Tsunami disasters repeat),” Manabi no mori No.16, June 2001.
  10. [10] K. Kitahara, “Kagaku Komyunikeeshon ha naze hitsuyouka: Gakujutu no koukyousei to aratana tenkai no tameni (Why is science communication necessary: for public need and new development of the acacemia),” http://www.jst.go.jp/csc/research/kitahara/ [accessed February 29, 2016]
  11. [11] H. Yokoyama, “Kagaku komyunikeeshon to ‘daisan no nami’ (Science communication and ‘The Theird Wave’), Bunshiken Letters 64, September 2011.
  12. [12] NHK-MT, “3D The Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami,” http://www.nhk-mt.co.jp/shinsai3d/ [accessed August 25, 2015]
  13. [13] M. Chikata, “3D dokyumentarii eiga ‘Otsunami 3.11 Mirai heno Kioku’ no koto (Regarding ‘The Great Tsunami in Japan: Reflecting on the 2011 Disaster’,” Eiga Televi Gijutsu, pp. 26-28, April 2015.
  14. [14] Video Tsushin, “NHK Media Technology chohen 3D dokyumentarii eiga ‘Otsunami 3.11 Mirai heno Kioku’ (NHK Media Technology full-length 3D documentary movie ‘The Great Tsunami in Japan: Reflecting on the 2011 Disaster’),” Video Tsushin No.3862, March 5, 2015.
  15. [15] M. Itoh, “Necessary Factors for Practical Science-Communication Design to Increase Benefits of Participating Scientists,” 39th Intelligent System Symposium, pp. 77-80, 2012, http://researchmapjp/?action=cv_download_main&upload_id=30784 [accessed August 30, 2015]
  16. [16] United Nations, “Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030,” March 18, 2015, http://www.preventionweb.net/files/resolutions/N1516716.pdf [accessed August 25, 2015]

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 20, 2018