Top > JDR > Educational Merits of Lecturing and Discussion Methods in Teac ...

single-dr.php

JDR Vol.9 No.5 pp. 870-878
(2014)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2014.p0870

Paper:

Views over last 60 days: 768

Educational Merits of Lecturing and Discussion Methods in Teaching Disaster Prevention: Toward Improvement of Students’ Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior in Merapi Volcano Area Primary Schools

Tuswadi* and Takehiro Hayashi**

*Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation, Hiroshima University, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima City, Hiroshima 739-8529, Japan

**Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University, 1-1-1, Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima City, Hiroshima 739-8524, Japan

Received:
March 12, 2014
Accepted:
July 2, 2014
Published:
October 1, 2014
Creative Commons License
Keywords:
educational merits, lectures, discussion, disaster prevention, primary schools
Abstract
This research investigated the educational benefits of improving students’ performance associated with two types of teaching used in integrated disaster prevention lessons. Our research, experimental in nature, applied a pretest/posttest control group design. The research sample consisted of 89 students in grade 5 at two primary schools near the Merapi volcano, which is under the Sleman regency of Yogyakarta Special Region Province, Indonesia. Students were classified into experimental and control groups. Using the same lesson content, delivered by one of our researchers, the experimental group was taught through discussions and the control group was taught through lectures. Findings showed that lectures improved two viewpoints in students’ knowledge – one regarding appropriate action taken while indoors during a big earthquake and the other about consequences of a big earthquake regarding a residential fire. Student viewpoints regarding their awareness of living in a disaster-prone area were also found to have improved through the use of lectures. Discussions were found to be helpful in improving only one viewpoint of students’ knowledge about appropriate actions while indoors during a big earthquake. Study results suggest that efforts should be made to develop effective education in volcanic disaster at school focusing on changes in students’ knowledge, attitude, and behavior.
Cite this article as:
Tuswadi and T. Hayashi, “Educational Merits of Lecturing and Discussion Methods in Teaching Disaster Prevention: Toward Improvement of Students’ Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior in Merapi Volcano Area Primary Schools,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.9 No.5, pp. 870-878, 2014.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] C. Kuhlicke, A. Steinfuhrer, C. Begg, and C. Bianchizza, “Perspectives on social capacity building for natural hazard: Outlining an emerging field of research and practice in Europe,” Environmental Science & Policy, Vol.14, pp. 804-814, 2011.
  2. [2] M. Panic, K. M. Jelena, and M. Dragana, “Importance of natural disaster education-case study of the earthquake near the city of Kraljevo,” J. Geogr. Inst. Cvijic., Vol.63, No.1, pp. 75-88, 2013.
  3. [3] Ministry of Education and Culture, “National policy on Mainstreaming of Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) at Schools,” 2010.
  4. [4] A. Ratdomopurbo and G. Poupinet, “An overview of the seismicity of Merapi volcano (Java, Indonesia), 1983-1994,” Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Vol.100, pp. 193-214, 2000.
  5. [5] B. Voight, E. K. Constantine, S. Siswowidjoyo, and R. Torley, “Historical eruption of Merapi volcano, Central Java, Indonesia, 1768-1998,” Journal of Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Vol.100, pp. 69-138, 2000.
  6. [6] J. C. Thouret, F. Lavigne, K. Kelfoun, and S. Bronto, “Toward a revised hazard assessment atMerapi volcano, Central Java,” Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Vol.100, pp. 479-502, 2000.
  7. [7] Tuswadi and T. Hayashi, “Preparedness assessment toward volcano eruption: Case of primary schools in Merapi area, Indonesia,” Journal of International Development and Cooperation, Vol.19, No.3, pp. 65-72, 2013.
  8. [8] D. Johnston, T. Tarrant, K. Tipler, M. Coomer, S. Pedersen, and R. Garside, “Preparing schools for future earthquakes in New Zealand: Lesson from an evaluation of a Wellington school exercise,” The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, Vol.26, No.1, pp. 24-30, 2011.
  9. [9] I. Dewi, “Urgensi Pendidikan Bencana Geologi,”
    http://www.travel.kompas.com/read/2010/12/08/09220449 [accessed April 13, 2012]
  10. [10] K. R. Ronan, K. Crellin, and D. Johnston, “Correlates of hazards education for youth: a replication study,” Nat Hazards, Vol.53, pp. 503-526, 2010.
  11. [11] R. Shaw, K. Shiwaku, H. Kobayashi, and M. Kobayashi, “Linking experience, education, perception and earthquake preparedness,” Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol.13, Iss.1, pp. 39-49, 2004.
  12. [12] J. S. Becker, D. M. Johnston, D. Paton, and K. Ronan, “Community resilience to earthquakes: Understanding how individuals make meaning of hazard information, and how this relates to preparing for hazards,” NZSEE Conference 2009, Conference Paper No.4.
  13. [13] K. R. Ronan, D. Johnston, M. Daly, and R. Fairley, “School children’s risk perceptions and preparedness: A hazards education survey,” The Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies (Electronic journal), No.1, 2001,
    retrieved from http://www.massey.ac.nz/ trauma/issues/2001-1/ronan.htm [accessed April 13, 2012]
  14. [14] K. R. Ronan and D. Johnston, “Hazards education in schools: Current findings, future directions,” APECWorkshop on Dissemination of Disaster Mitigation Technologies for Humanistic Concerns Phase 1: Earthquake Disaster, Taipei, Taiwan, June 18-21, 2001.
  15. [15] F. Rahman, J. K. Khalil, N. B. Jumani, M. Ajmal, S. Malik, and M. Sharif, “Impact of discussion method on students’ performance,” International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol.2 No.7, pp. 84-94, 2011.
  16. [16] G. H. Walker, “Lecturing with style,” The University of Tennessee. Chattanooga, 2003.
  17. [17] B. S. Bloom and D. R. Krathwohl, “Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals by a committee of college and university examiners,” Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman, Green, 1956.
  18. [18] R. T. Hyman, “Improving discussion leadership,” NY: Teacher College Columbia University, 1980.
  19. [19] E. G. Vedanayagam, “Teaching technology for college teachers,” New Delhi: Sterling publishers, 1994.
  20. [20] S. Moore, “Cases vs lectures: A comparison of learning, outcomes in undergraduate principles of finance,” Journal of Financial Education, 1999.

Creative Commons License  This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Oct. 11, 2024