JDR Vol.6 No.2 pp. 258-270
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2011.p0258


Participatory Disaster Management Learning Built on the Theory of Legitimate Peripheral Participation

Hideyuki Shiroshita* and Katsuya Yamori**

*Faculty of Safety Science, Kansai University, 7-1 Hakubai-cho, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-1098, Japan

**Research Center for Disaster Reduction Systems, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Gokasho, Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan

October 21, 2010
February 5, 2011
April 1, 2011
disaster management education, theory of legitimate peripheral participation, communities of practice, participatory disaster management learning, Manten Project
In some areas in Japan, there have been times when even though it was desirable to evacuate the area in order to prevent or reduce the amount of damage wrought by disaster, the actual evacuation rate was low. The double bind theory has been introduced in this situation, and a new theoretical interpretation has been obtained. However, no specific countermeasures have been presented to overcome the “expert and non-expert” structure shown in the double bind theory to be a problem of disaster management. This paper depends on the “theory of legitimate peripheral participation,” and it aims to build up a model of what the new disaster management education should be to overcome this problem. For the model not to become empty, this paper also introduces the “learning program built on the Manten Project (Perfect-score Project),” which is an example of a new type of participatory disaster management learning program implemented based on the model.
Cite this article as:
H. Shiroshita and K. Yamori, “Participatory Disaster Management Learning Built on the Theory of Legitimate Peripheral Participation,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.6 No.2, pp. 258-270, 2011.
Data files:
  1. [1] Japan Meteorological Agency, “Tsunami Warnings/Advisories, 9:33AM, February 28, 2010,”
    [Accessed: October 20, 2010]
  2. [2] Cabinet Office (Disaster Management Office), Government of Japan, and Fire and Disaster Management Agency, “Questionnaire survey regarding the tsunami evacuation at Chile Earthquake 2010,”
    [Accessed: October 20, 2010]
  3. [3] T. Katada, M. Kodama, N. Kuwasawa, and S. Koshimura, “Issues of resident’s consciousness and evacuation from the tsunami: from questionnaire survey in kesennuma city, miyagi pref. after the earthquake of miyagiken-oki, 2003,” Proceedings of JSCE (789), pp. 93-104, 2005 (in Japanese).
  4. [4] K. Yamori, “Double bind on disaster information,” Journal of Disaster Information Studies, pp. 27-33, 2009 (in Japanese).
  5. [5] K. Yamori, S. Kondo, and Y. Okumura, “As an event by mass media: Chile Earthquake 2010 (1) – a new frame of analyzing structure to construct reality,” proceedings of the 12th conference of Japan Society for Disaster Information Studies, pp. 189-194, 2010 (in Japanese).
  6. [6] K. Yamori, “Disaster information and disaster management education,” Saigai-Jouhou, Vol.8, pp. 1-6, 2010.
  7. [7] Y. Fujigaki, “PUS Theory,” in Y. Fujigaki and Y. Hirono (Ed.), “Science Communication Theory,” University of Tokyo Press, pp. 93-108, 2008 (in Japanese).
  8. [8] Yoshiaki Kawata, “Prediction of Loss of Human Lives Due to Catastrophic Earthquake Disaster,” Journal of Japan Society for Natural Disaster Science, Vol.16, No.1, pp. 3-13, 1997 (in Japanese).
  9. [9] Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, “Disaster management education to train the ‘strength for living’,” 1998 (in Japanese).
  10. [10] Bousaishi Training Center, website, “Basic program for training on the place,” (in Japanese),
    [Accessed:January 24, 2010]
  11. [11] K. Yamori, “Recommendation of disaster management in living,”Nakanishiya Shuppan, 2005 (in Japanese).
  12. [12] H. Shiroshita, “Survey report on disaster management education in elementary school and junior high school,” 2006 (not published).
  13. [13] M. Wanatabe Laboratory, “Situation on education for disaster management and security and its problems in public schools in Tokyo, (1st survey report),” (in Japanese),
    [Accessed: January 24, 2010]
  14. [14] Y. Saeki, “Education as participation for cultural practice,” in Y. Saeki, M. Sato, and H. Fujita, “An invitation to learning,” University of Tokyo. Press, Tokyo, 1995.
  15. [15] Y. Saeki, “What is the learning ?,” in H. Kawai, N. Kudo, Y. Saeki, T. Mori, and S. Kudo, “Strength to learn,” Iwanami shoten, p. 146, 2004 (in Japanese).
  16. [16] J. Lave and E. Wenger, “Situated Learning – Legitimate peripheral participation,” Cambridge University Press, 1991. (Japanese version: Translated by Y. Saeki, Sangyo Tosho, 1993)
  17. [17] T. Ito, Y. Fujimoto, T. Kawamata, M. Kashima, Y. Yamaguchi, K. Hosaka, S. Shiroma and K. Sato, “On Wenger’s Concept of “Cultural Transparency” in Situated Approach for Learning,” Bulletin of Faculty of Education, Hokkaido University, No.93, pp. 81-157, 2004 (in Japanese).
  18. [18] M. Koyama, “How to utilize a volcano hazard map,” 11th PublicLectures of the Volcanological Society of Japan,
    [Accessed: January 24, 2010]
  19. [19] Y. Iio, “What ‘Manten Project’ produces –making weather map ofcrustal stress at the first time in the world–,” pp. 1-4 (in Japanese),˜iio/manten_20071221.pdf
    [Accessed:January 25, 2010]
  20. [20] Y. Iio, website, “Manten Project” (in Japanese),˜iio/manten.html
    [Accessed: January 25, 2010]
  21. [21] Research Center for Earthquake Prediction, website, “Abuyama Seismological Observatory,”
    [Accessed: January 25, 2010]
  22. [22] N. Fukuwa, J. Tobita, and H. Takai, “Proposal of dual direction disaster information framework ANSHIN-system using mobile disaster information unit ANSHIN-KUN,” AIJ Tokai Chapter Architectural Research Meeting, No.38, pp. 165-168, 2000 (in Japanese).
  23. [23] K. Yamori, S. Suwa, and N. Funaki, “Dreaming disaster mitigation education,” Koyo Shobo, 2007 (in Japanese).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jul. 19, 2024