single-jc.php

JACIII Vol.29 No.3 pp. 677-686
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2025.p0677
(2025)

Research Paper:

Spatial Correlation of Digital Economy Innovation and Economic Growth in China

Jian Wang ORCID Icon

Institute of Quantitative Economics and Statistics, Huaqiao University
No.668 Jimei Avenue, Jimei District, Xiamen, Fujian 361021, China

Corresponding author

Received:
December 7, 2024
Accepted:
March 20, 2025
Published:
May 20, 2025
Keywords:
digital economy innovation, economic growth, social network analysis
Abstract

Digital technology innovation has become a powerful driving force for economic growth and social development. However, due to significant disparities in digital technology research and development investment, patent applications, industrial foundation, and policy support across different regions, there exists a notable variation in the spatial distribution and development level of digital economy innovation among China’s regions. This article measures the digital economy innovation levels of each region, establishes a spatial association network using the gravity model to calculate the centrality indicators of each region, and thereby determines their position in the network. The digital economy innovation levels and network positions of each region are used as core explanatory variables, and a spatial econometric model is employed to analyze their impact on economic growth. The main conclusions of the article are as follows. (1) From 2011 to 2022, the cities with the highest levels of digital economy innovation in China are concentrated in economically developed regions such as Beijing–Tianjin–Tangshan, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Pearl River Delta. The overall distribution pattern shows higher levels in the southeast and lower levels in the northwest. (2) Provinces with higher centrality in the digital economy innovation network include both economically developed and underdeveloped regions, indicating the spatial effects of digital economy innovation. (3) Digital economy innovation can not only promote local economic growth but also drive economic growth in neighboring regions through spillover effects. (4) There is a positive correlation between the position in the digital economy innovation network and regional economic growth rates.

China’s digital economy innovation network

China’s digital economy innovation network

Cite this article as:
J. Wang, “Spatial Correlation of Digital Economy Innovation and Economic Growth in China,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.29 No.3, pp. 677-686, 2025.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] J. Yang, Q. Peng, and Z. Ge, “Spillover effect of digital transformation along the supply chain—The perspective of supplier innovation,” China Industrial Economics, Vol.2022, No.8, pp. 156-174, 2022 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2022.08.009
  2. [2] R. D. Atkinson and A. S. McKay, “Digital prosperity: Understanding the economic benefits of the information technology revolution,” SSRN, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1004516
  3. [3] J. Bai and X. Chen, “Digital economy, spatial spillover effect and regional innovation efficiency,” R&D Management, Vol.34, No.6, pp. 67-78, 2022 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.20211722
  4. [4] J. Wang, J. Zhu, and X. Luo, “Research on the measurement of China’s digital economy development and the characteristics,” The J. of Quantitative & Technical Economics, Vol.38, No.7, pp. 26-42, 2021 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.2021.07.002
  5. [5] Y. Liu, J. Dong, L. Mei, and R. Shen, “Digital innovation and performance of manufacturing firms: An affordance perspective,” Technovation, Vol.119, Article No.102458, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102458
  6. [6] F. Tao, P. Zhu, C. Qiu, and X. Wang, “The impact of digital technology innovation on enterprise market value,” J. of Quantitative & Technological Economics, Vol.40, No.5, pp. 68-91, 2023 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.20230310.010
  7. [7] A. Omri, “Technological innovation and sustainable development: Does the stage of development matter?,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol.83, Article No.106398, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106398
  8. [8] H. Wang, H. Cui, and Q. Zhao, “Effect of green technology innovation on green total factor productivity in China: Evidence from spatial Durbin model analysis,” J. of Cleaner Production, Vol.288, Article No.125624, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125624
  9. [9] Y. Yoo, R. J. Boland, Jr., K. Lyytinen, and A. Majchrzak, “Organizing for innovation in the digitized world,” Organization Science, Vol.23, No.5, pp. 1398-1408, 2012.
  10. [10] P. Aghion, R. Blundell, R. Griffith, P. Howitt, and S. Prantl, “The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.91, No.1, pp. 20-32, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.1.20
  11. [11] D. Tapscott, “The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence,” McGraw-Hill, 1996.
  12. [12] D. Acemoglu and P. Restrepo. “The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment,” American Economic Review, Vol.108, No.6, pp. 1488-1542, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160696
  13. [13] Z. Wu, “Agglomeration structure, knowledge spillover and regional innovation performance—Analysis based on spatial econometrics,” J. of Shanxi Finance and Economics University, Vol.32, No.3, pp. 15-22, 2010 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13781/j.cnki.1007-9556.2010.03.003
  14. [14] B. T. Asheim, H. L. Smith, and C. Oughton, “Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy,” Regional Studies, Vol.45, No.7, pp. 875-891, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.596701
  15. [15] S. Chen and X. Liu, “Innovation spillovers in production networks—Evidence from quasi-natural experimental research of national high-tech zones,” China Economic Quarterly, Vol.21, No.5, pp. 1839-1858, 2021 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2021.05.16
  16. [16] Z. Chen and S. Zhang, “Digital economy, spatial spillover and regional innovation capability enhancement,” J. of Management, Vol.36, No.1, pp. 84-101, 2023 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.19808/j.cnki.41-1408/F.2023.0007
  17. [17] M. E. Porter, “The Competitive Advantage of Nations,” Macmillan Press, 1998.
  18. [18] M. Huang and D. Yao, “R&D elements flow, spatial spillover effect and regional innovation efficiency—An analysis of the spatial Durbin model based on interprovincial panel data,” Science Research Management, Vol.43, No.4, pp. 149-157, 2022 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2022.04.017
  19. [19] H. Shao, L. Zhou, and Y. Liu, “Study on the spatial network structure and driving factors of regional innovation development in China,” Studies in Science of Science, Vol.36, No.11, pp. 2055-2069, 2018 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.2018.11.016
  20. [20] R. Lv, Y. Jia, and Y. Zhang, “Spatial correlation and interpretation of regional scientific and technological innovation in China,” Review of Economy and Management, Vol.35, No.4, pp. 106-115, 2019 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13962/j.cnki.37-1486/f.2019.04.010
  21. [21] C. Luo and J. Zhang, “The innovative spill-over effects of china’s export expansion: The example of Thailand,” Social Sciences in China, Vol.2012, No.11, pp. 57-80+204-205, 2012 (in Chinese).
  22. [22] C. Yu, G. Yang, and M. Du, “Industrial policy and technological innovation of China’s digital economy industries,” Statistical Research, Vol.38, No.1, pp. 51-64, 2021 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2021.01.005
  23. [23] C. Minoiu and J. A. Reyes, “A network analysis of global banking: 1978–2010,” J. of Financial Stability, Vol.9, No.2, pp. 168-184, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2013.03.001
  24. [24] J. Li, S. Chen, G. Wan, and C. Fu, “Study on the spatial correlation and explanation of regional economic growth in China—Based on analytic network process,” Economic Research J., Vol.49, No.11, pp. 4-16, 2014 (in Chinese).
  25. [25] F. Svahn, L. Mathiassen, and R. Lindgren, “Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How Volvo cars managed competing concerns,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.41, No.1, pp. 239-253, 2017. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.12
  26. [26] H. Liu, C. Liu, and Y. Sun, “Spatial correlation network structure of energy consumption and its effect in China,” China Industrial Economics, Vol.2015, No.5, pp. 83-95, 2015 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2015.05.008
  27. [27] X. Wang, Y. Yang, X. Luo, and T. Wen, “The spatial correlation network and formation mechanism of China’s high-quality economic development,” Acta Geographica Sinica, Vol.77, No.8, pp. 1920-1936, 2022 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb202208006
  28. [28] T. Ciarli, M. Kenney, S. Massini, and L. Piscitello, “Digital technologies, innovation, and skills: Emerging trajectories and challenges,” Research Policy, Vol.50, No.7, Article No.104289, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104289
  29. [29] T. Jin and M. Wu, “The relationship between digital economy, innovation capability, and economic growth,” Social Science Front, Vol.2022, No.12, pp. 248-252, 2022 (in Chinese).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on May. 19, 2025