single-jc.php

JACIII Vol.28 No.4 pp. 1005-1017
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2024.p1005
(2024)

Research Paper:

A Supply Chain Oriented Product Design Optimization Decision Method Based on Improved CUR Matrix Decomposition

Shuang Wu*1,*2,*3, Hengxin Lei*1,*2,*3,†, Tong Ming Lim*4, Tew Yiqi*1, and Wong Thein Lai*1

*1Faculty of Computing and Information Technology (FOCS), Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology (TAR UMT)
Jalan Gwnting Kwlang, Kuala Lumpur 53300, Malaysia

*2Yantai University
No.30 Laishan Qingquan Road, Yantai, Shandong 264005, China

*3Yantai Nanshan University
1 Nanshan Middle Road, Longkou, Yantai, Shandong 265006, China

*4Centre For Business Incubation And Entrepreneurial Ventures (CBIEV), Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology (TAR UMT)
Jalan Gwnting Kwlang, Kuala Lumpur 53300, Malaysia

Corresponding author

Received:
November 2, 2023
Accepted:
April 30, 2024
Published:
July 20, 2024
Keywords:
improved CUR matrix decomposition, module configuration, intelligent decision-making, customer clustering
Abstract

At present, product family design has become an important link in enterprise development and manufacturing. Optimization ideas and technologies are important foundations and core frameworks in product family design. Previous research on product family design has mainly been limited to optimization problems within the product domain. As an important influencing factor in the product family design process, the supply chain not only affects the cost level of the product family in the back-end of the design process, but also affects the modular structure layout of the product family in the front-end of the design process. Therefore, the optimization of the correlation between supply chain and product family design process is a crucial issue that determines the success or failure of product families. However, when researching the personalized needs of users in product family design and configuring product modules, there is very little consideration given to the optimization of supply chain correlation. To address the aforementioned issues, this article develops supply chain oriented product design optimization decision-making method based on improved CUR matrix decomposition. Firstly, based on the customer’s functional requirements C matrix and module relationship R matrix, perform customer clustering and corresponding product configuration. Then, utilizing the numerical stability of orthogonal trigonometric decomposition (QR), U matrix is constructed, which represents the inherent relationship between functional requirements and module relationships. Secondly, based on quality/character requirements, functional module levels division and initial supplier configuration are carried out. Finally, determine the supplier configuration for each module with the goal of maximizing total profit. Analyze the customer selection, classification, and product configuration process of a contractor as a case study. The research results indicate that the optimization decision method based on improved CUR matrix decomposition can effectively obtain the optimal solution of the decision problem.

Cite this article as:
S. Wu, H. Lei, T. Lim, T. Yiqi, and W. Lai, “A Supply Chain Oriented Product Design Optimization Decision Method Based on Improved CUR Matrix Decomposition,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.28 No.4, pp. 1005-1017, 2024.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] F. Sudirjo, “Marketing Strategy in Improving Product Competitiveness in the Global Market,” J. of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), Vol.1, No.2, pp. 63-69, 2023. https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v1i2.24
  2. [2] K. Jones, L. Mosca, J. Whyte et al., “Addressing specialization and fragmentation: Product platform development in construction consultancy firms,” Construction Management and Economics, Vol.40, Issues 11-12, pp. 918-933, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.1983187
  3. [3] R. Andersen, T. D. Brunoe, and K. Nielsen, “Platform-based product development in the process industry: A systematic literature review,” Int. J. of Production Research, Vol.61, Issue 5, pp. 1696-1719, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2044085
  4. [4] J. Pfeiffer, D. Lehner, A. Wortmann et al., “Towards a Product Line Architecture for Digital Twins,” 2023 IEEE 20th Int. Conf. on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C), pp. 187-190, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C57050.2023.00049
  5. [5] S. Ma, Y. Zhang, J. Lv et al., “Data-driven cleaner production strategy for energy-intensive manufacturing industries: Case studies from Southern and Northern China,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol.53, Article No.101684, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101684
  6. [6] S. Xing, Z. Jiang, X. Zhang et al., “Product Design Scheme Generation and Optimization Decisions While Considering Remanufacturability,” Mathematics, Vol.10, Issue 14, Article No.2477, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10142477
  7. [7] D. Ray, N. V. George, and P. K. Meher, “An analytical framework and approximation strategy for efficient implementation of distributed arithmetic-based inner-product architectures,” IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, Vol.67, Issue 1, pp. 212-224, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2019.2948791
  8. [8] H. Liu and H. Zhao, “Upgrading models, evolutionary mechanisms and vertical cases of service-oriented manufacturing in SVC leading enterprises: Product-development and service-innovation for industry 4.0,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Vol.9, No.1, Article No.387, 2022. http://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01409-9
  9. [9] Y. Chang, L. Chen, Y. Zhou et al., “Elements, characteristics, and performances of inter-enterprise knowledge recombination: Empirical research on green innovation adoption in China’s heavily polluting industry,” J. of Environmental Management, Vol.310, Article No.114736, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114736
  10. [10] Y. Shen and K. Liao, “An application of analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight method in food cold chain risk evaluation model,” Frontiers in Psychology, Vol.13, No.1, pp. 82-96, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825696
  11. [11] M. Gu, Y. Zhang, D. Li et al., “The effect of high-involvement human resource management practices on supply chain resilience and operational performance,” J. of Management Science and Engineering, Vol.8, Issue 2, pp. 176-190, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2022.12.001
  12. [12] Z. Zhang, T. Zhang, J. Hong et al., “Energy Management Optimization of Master–Slave Hybrid Electric Vehicle under Rule-Based Control Strategy,” Energy Technology, Vol.10, Issue 10, pp. 22-63, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.202200630
  13. [13] R. B. Stone, K. L. Wood, and R. H. Crawford, “A Heuristic Method for identifying modules for Product Architectures,” Design Studies, Vol.21, Issue 1, pp. 5-31, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00003-4
  14. [14] W. Wits and T. H. J. Vaneker, “TRIZ Based Interface Conflict Resolving Strategies for Modular Product Architectures,” Procedia Engineering, Vol.9, pp. 30-39, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.098
  15. [15] K. Fujita, “Product Variety Optimization under Modular Architecture,” Computer-Aided Design, Vol.34, Issue 12, pp. 953-965, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00149-X
  16. [16] A. A. A. Cabrera, K. Woestenenk, and T. Tomiyama, “An Architecture Model to Support Cooperative Design for Mechatronic Products: A Control Design Case,” Mechatronics, Vol.21, Issue 3, pp. 534-547, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2011.01.009
  17. [17] K. G. Mertens, C. Rennpferdt, E. Greve, D. Krause, and M. Meyer, “Reviewing the intellectual structure of product modularization: Toward a common view and future research agenda,” J. of Product Innovation Management, Vol.40, Issue 1, pp. 86-119, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12642
  18. [18] J. Vogt, L.-N. Woeller, and D. Krause, “Effects of Product Personalization: Considering Personalizability in the Product Architecture of Modular Product Families,” J. of Mechanical Design, Vol.146, Issue 4, pp. 12-15, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063825
  19. [19] J. F. Lampón and E. Rivo-López, “Modular product architecture implementation and decisions on production network structure and strategic plant roles,” Production Planning & Control, Vol.33, Issue 15, pp. 1449-1464, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1877367
  20. [20] H. Muccini and A. von der Hoek, “Towards Testing Product Line Architectures,” Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, Vol.82, Issue 6, pp. 99-109, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1571-0661(04)81029-6
  21. [21] L. Gauss, D. P. Lacerda, and P. A. Cauchick Miguel “Module-based product family design: Systematic literature review and meta-synthesis,” J. of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol.32, pp. 265-312, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01572-3
  22. [22] T.-S. Gan, M. Steffan, M. Grunow, and R. Akkerman, “Concurrent design of product and supply chain architectures for modularity and flexibility: Process, methods, and application,” Int. J. of Production Research, Vol.60, Issue 7, pp. 2292-2311, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1886370
  23. [23] Z. Aripin, F. Yulianty, and Fitriana, “A Quantitative performance management framework to improve community economy through omnichannel supply chain: A case study in the banking and marketing industry,” Kriez Academy: J. of Development and Community Service, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 15-24, 2023.
  24. [24] J. Hidayati, R. Vamelia, J. Hammami, and E. Endri, “Transparent distribution system design of halal beef supply chain,” Uncertain Supply Chain Management, Vol.11, Issue 1, pp. 31-40, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.12.003
  25. [25] E. Reitsma, P. Hilletofth, and E. Johansson, “Supply chain design during product development: a systematic literature review,” Production Planning & Control, Vol.34, Issue 1, pp. 1-18, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1884763
  26. [26] S. M. Sajadiyan, R. Hosnavi, M. Karbasian, and M. Abbasi, “An approach for reliable circular supplier selection and circular closed-loop supply chain network design focusing on the collaborative costs, shortage, and circular criteria,” Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol.17, Issue 1, pp. 1-24, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02668-x
  27. [27] D. Ivanov, A. Dolgui, and B. Sokolov, “Cloud supply chain: Integrating Industry 4.0 and digital platforms in the “Supply Chain-as-a-Service”,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol.160, Article No.102676, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102676
  28. [28] B. Esmaeilian, J. Sarkis, K. Lewis, and S. Behdad, “Blockchain for the future of sustainable supply chain management in Industry 4.0,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol.163, Article No.105064, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105064
  29. [29] M. B. Fakhrzad and F. Goodarzian, “A new multi-objective mathematical model for a Citrus supply chain network design: Metaheuristic algorithms,” J. of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, Vol.14, Issue 2, pp. 111-128, 2021. https://doi.org/10.22094/joie.2020.570636.1571
  30. [30] B. Sundarakani, A. Ajaykumar, and A. Gunasekaran, “Big data driven supply chain design and applications for blockchain: An action research using case study approach,” Omega, Vol.102, Article No.102452, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2021.102452
  31. [31] F. Baldassarre, R. Silvestri, F. Ricciardi, and S. Santovito, “Supply chain risk management for a sustainable strategy: A study in the furniture industry,” Int. J. of Decision Sciences, Risk and Management, Vol.10, Nos.3-4, pp. 227-248, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJDSRM.2022.125014
  32. [32] I. Khettabi, L. Benyoucef, and M. A. Boutiche, “Sustainable reconfigurable manufacturing system design using adapted multi-objective evolutionary-based approaches,” The Int. J. of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.115, No.11, pp. 3741-3759, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07337-3
  33. [33] S. Mahmud, A. Abbasi, R. K. Chakrabortty, and M. J. Ryan, “A self-adaptive hyper-heuristic based multi-objective optimisation approach for integrated supply chain scheduling problems,” Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol.251, Article No.109190, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109190
  34. [34] R. Campos Sabioni, J. Daaboul, and J. Le Duigou, “Concurrent optimisation of modular product and Reconfigurable Manufacturing System configuration: A customer-oriented offer for mass customisation,” Int. J. of Production Research, Vol.60, Issue 7, pp. 2275-2291, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1886369
  35. [35] C. Tan, H. Chung, K. Barton, S. J. Hu, and T. Freiheit, “Incorporating customer personalization preferences in open product architecture design,” J. of Manufacturing Systems, Vol.56, pp. 72-83, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.05.006
  36. [36] X. Ren and N. Zhao, “Optimization of coordination configuration between product service system and supply chain based on Stackelberg game,” J. of Industrial and Management Optimization, Vol.20, Issue 7, pp. 2452-2476, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2024009
  37. [37] Y. Yang, J. Chen, P. K. Lee, and T. C. Cheng, “How to enhance the effects of the green supply chain management strategy in the organization: A diffusion process perspective,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol.175, Article No.103148, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103148
  38. [38] M. S. Hossain, R. K. Chakrabortty, S. Elsawah, and M. J. Ryan, “Modelling and application of hierarchical joint optimisation for modular product family and supply chain architecture,” The Int. J. of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.126, Issue 2, pp. 947-971, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11102-z
  39. [39] H. Lei, J. Liu, and Y. Yu, “Exemplar-based large-scale low-rank matrix decomposition for collaborative prediction,” Int. J. of Computer Mathematics, Vol.100, Issue 3, pp. 615-640, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2022.2141571
  40. [40] H. Lei and S. Wu, “Interpretable Fuzzy Granular Reasoning Framework for Industrial Dynamic Complex Event Recognition,” Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils, Vol.59, Issue 2, pp. 311-322, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-023-01531-7

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Nov. 04, 2024