single-jc.php

JACIII Vol.28 No.4 pp. 805-815
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2024.p0805
(2024)

Research Paper:

The Spatial Impact of Innovation Efficiency on Green Development

Yanwu Chen*,† ORCID Icon, Jiamin Lin*, Na Cui*, Yihe Zhu*, and Jun Pan**,*** ORCID Icon

*Institute of Quantitative Economics, Huaqiao University
No.668 Jimei Avenue, Jimei District, Xiamen, Fujian 361021, China

Corresponding author

**College of Finance and Accounting, Minnan University of Science and Technology
No.1 Longjin Road, Shishi, Quanzhou, Fujian 362700, China

***School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia
UPM Serdang Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

Received:
December 25, 2023
Accepted:
February 23, 2024
Published:
July 20, 2024
Keywords:
innovation, green development, double-efficiency, coupling coordination model, spatial panel Durbin model (SPDM)
Abstract

Innovation and green development are important aspects of a country’s economic and social development. Exploring the impact of innovation on green development from a spatial perspective can help local governments suggest measures to promote green development. The super-efficiency slack-based measure model and stochastic frontier analysis model were used separately to measure green development and innovation. The coupling coordination degree model was used to measure the interaction of “double efficiency.” Based on the spatial panel Durbin model, the spatial impact of innovation behavior on green development was studied, and regional heterogeneity was further studied. The study found that in the eastern region, provinces with a high degree of innovation and a developed financial industry have a negative effect on the green development of their neighboring provinces. In the central and western regions, the higher the innovation level of a region, the more negative the green development of neighboring regions is. A high-level financial industry promotes the green development of neighboring regions.

Cite this article as:
Y. Chen, J. Lin, N. Cui, Y. Zhu, and J. Pan, “The Spatial Impact of Innovation Efficiency on Green Development,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.28 No.4, pp. 805-815, 2024.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] R. Gu et al., “The impact of industrial digital transformation on green development efficiency considering the threshold effect of regional collaborative innovation: Evidence from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration in China,” J. of Cleaner Production, Vol.420, Article No.138345, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138345
  2. [2] Y. Hu et al., “Financial agglomeration and regional green innovation efficiency from the perspective of spatial spillover,” J. of Innovation & Knowledge, Vol.8, No.4, Article No.100434, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100434
  3. [3] M. Mohsin et al., “The role of technological progress and renewable energy deployment in green economic growth,” Renewable Energy, Vol.190, pp. 777-787, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.076
  4. [4] T. Liu and Y. Li, “Green development of China’s Pan-Pearl River Delta mega-urban agglomeration,” Scientific Reports, Vol.11, No.1, Article No.15717, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95312-z
  5. [5] Y. Luo et al., “The heterogeneous effects of different technological innovations on eco-efficiency: Evidence from 30 China’s provinces,” Ecological Indicators, Vol.127, Article No.107802, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107802
  6. [6] H. Ai, X. Wu, and K. Li, “Differentiated effects of diversified technological sources on China’s electricity consumption: Evidence from the perspective of rebound effect,” Energy Policy, Vol.137, Article No.111084, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111084
  7. [7] Y.-J. Zhang, H.-R. Peng, and B. Su, “Energy rebound effect in China’s Industry: An aggregate and disaggregate analysis,” Energy Economics, Vol.61, pp. 199-208, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.011
  8. [8] H. D. Saunders, “Fuel conserving (and using) production functions,” Energy Economics, Vol.30, No.5, pp. 2184-2235, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.11.006
  9. [9] Z. Li, Q. Tan, and J. Bai, “Spatial econometric analysis on region innovation production in China on empirical study of static and dynamic spatial panel models,” Management World, Vol.2010, No.7, pp. 43-55+65, 2010 (in Chinese).
  10. [10] L. Simar and P. W. Wilson, “Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models,” Management Science, Vol.44, No.1, pp. 49-61, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.1.49
  11. [11] A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European J. of Operational Research, Vol.2, No.6, pp. 429-444, 1978. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  12. [12] K. Tone, “A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis,” European J. of Operational Research, Vol.130, No.3, pp. 498-509, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
  13. [13] P. Andersen and N. C. Petersen, “A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis,” Management Science, Vol.39, No.10, pp. 1261-1264, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
  14. [14] Y. Yuan et al., “Data driven discovery of cyber physical systems,” Nature Communications Vol.10, No.1, Article No.4894, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12490-1
  15. [15] W. Zhang and Y. Hu, “The effect of innovative human capital on green total factor productivity in the Yangtze River Delta: An empirical analysis based on the spatial Durbin model,” China Population, Resources and Environment, Vol.30, No.9, pp. 106-120, 2020 (in Chinese).
  16. [16] J. P. H. Poon, P. Kedron, and S. Bagchi-Sen, “Do foreign subsidiaries innovate and perform better in a cluster? A spatial analysis of Japanese subsidiaries in the US,” Applied Geography, Vol.44, pp. 33-42, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.007

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Nov. 04, 2024