single-jc.php

JACIII Vol.27 No.6 pp. 1056-1069
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2023.p1056
(2023)

Research Paper:

A Study on Time-Varying Synergy of Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and CO2 Emissions in China

Xiaoxu Shang, Shipeng Huang, and Jing Zheng

College of Economics, Hangzhou Dianzi University
No.1158, No.2 Street, Qiantang District, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received:
March 30, 2023
Accepted:
May 16, 2023
Published:
November 20, 2023
Keywords:
time-varying synergy, China, CO2 emissions, MS-VAR model, impulse response function analysis
Abstract

Since its reform and opening, the Chinese economy has witnessed unprecedented development. This long-term high-speed development has significantly impacted the environment. In the process of energy development and consumption, the environment has been severely polluted, and greenhouse emissions have increased. This has resulted in environmental imbalances such as global climate change, rising sea levels, and extreme weather. Using annual energy consumption (EC), economic growth (GDP), and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in China from 1981 to 2021, this study employed the maximum likelihood estimation method to estimate the parameters of the nonlinear MS-VAR model. Cointegration tests, regimes analysis methods, and impulse response function analysis methods were adopted to explore the differences or similarities in the dynamics of the three under various regimes. The research results are as following. (i) The cointegration test findings demonstrate a long-term equilibrium relationship among EC, economic growth, and CO2 emissions. (ii) Regime analyses exhibit that there are three regimes: “low-level regime,” “medium-level regime,” and “high-level regime.” The three regimes have a mutual transfer transmission mechanism that exhibits nonlinear properties. (iii) Impulse response function analyses show that external EC and GDP shocks favorably impact the other two variables in all three regimes. EC in all three regimes is negatively impacted by external CO2 shocks. Moreover, in the “low-level regime,” the relationship between CO2 and GDP has an inverted U-curve, whereas in the other two regimes, the relationship has a negative association. This study can help China formulate reasonable and effective CO2 emissions reduction and energy policies and successfully achieve the emissions reduction goal of the 14th Five Year Plan as well as dual carbon goals.

Results of Regime transition analysis and impulse response analysis

Results of Regime transition analysis and impulse response analysis

Cite this article as:
X. Shang, S. Huang, and J. Zheng, “A Study on Time-Varying Synergy of Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and CO2 Emissions in China,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.27 No.6, pp. 1056-1069, 2023.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] O. J. Abban and H. X. Yao, “What initiates carbon dioxide emissions along the belt and road initiative? An insight from a dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis based on incarnated carbon panel,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., Vol.28, pp. 64516-64535, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14779-5
  2. [2] M. S. Storm, S. P. Hesselbo, H. C. Jenkyns, M. Ruhl, C. V. Ullmann, W. M. Xu, M. J. Leng, J. B. Riding, and O. Gorbanenko, “Orbital pacing and secular evolution of the Early Jurassic carbon cycle,” Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), Vol.117, No.8, pp. 3974-3982, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912094117
  3. [3] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, “Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis,” Cambridge, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  4. [4] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, “Global warming of 1.5°C,” Cambridge, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 2018.
  5. [5] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, “Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis,” Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, Cambridge University Press, p. 2391, 2021.
  6. [6] J. Kraft and A. Kraft, “On the Relationship Between Energy and GNP,” The J. of Energy and Development, Vol.3, pp. 401-403, 1978.
  7. [7] D. Kim and Y. J. Park, “Nonlinear causality between energy consumption and economic growth by timescale,” Energy Strategy Reviews, Vol.44, Article No.100949, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100949
  8. [8] S. Wang, “Differences between energy consumption and regional economic growth under the energy environment,” Energy Reports, Vol.8, pp. 10017-10024, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.065
  9. [9] W. B. Deng and B. Zhuang, “Research on the Relation of Energy Consumption, Export Trade and Economic Growth: Empricial Analysis of G20 Based on PVAR Model,” J. of Technical Economics & Management, pp. 18-22, 2021 (in Chinese).
  10. [10] A. Pala, “Energy and economic growth in G20 countries: Panel cointegration analysis,” Economics and Business Letters, Vol.9, No.2, pp. 56-72, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.9.2.2020.56-72
  11. [11] P. Petrović, “Economic sustainability of energy conservation policy: improved panel data evidence,” Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol.25, pp. 1473-1491, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02104-6
  12. [12] Z. R. Zhang, “An empirical analysis of the relationship between economic growth and energy consumption,” J. of Commercial Economics, pp. 36-39, 2018 (in Chinese).
  13. [13] Y. Xu, “An empirical study on the relationship between new energy consumption and economic growth,” Economic Review J., pp. 69-74, 2017 (in Chinese).
  14. [14] S. Narayan and N. Doytch, “An investigation of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth nexus using industrial and residential energy consumption,” Energy Economics, Vol.68, pp. 160-176, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.09.005
  15. [15] Danish, B. Zhang, B. Wang, and Z. Wang, “Role of renewable energy and non-renewable energy consumption on EKC: Evidence from Pakistan,” J. of Cleaner Production, Vol.156, pp. 855-864, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.203
  16. [16] M. El-Karimi, “Economic growth and non-renewable and renewable energy consumption nexus in Morocco: Causality analysis in VAR model,” Int. J. of Sustainable Economy, Vol.14, No.2, pp. 111-131, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2022.122092
  17. [17] M. A. Alsaedi, F. Abnisa, P. A. Alaba, and H. U. Farouk, “Investigating the relevance of Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Saudi Arabia: Towards energy efficiency and minimal carbon dioxide emission,” Clean Techn Environ Policy, Vol.24, No.4, pp. 1285-1300, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02244-3
  18. [18] Z. Weimin, M. Sibt-e-Ali, M. Tariq, V. Dagar, and M. K. Khan, “Globalization toward environmental sustainability and electricity consumption to environmental degradation: Does EKC inverted U-shaped hypothesis exist between squared economic growth and CO2 emissions in top globalized economies,” Environment Science Pollution Research, Vol.29, pp. 59974-59984, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20192-3
  19. [19] D. B. Zhu, L. Ren, and Y. Liu, “Financial inclusive development, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in China,” China Population, Resources and Environment, Vol.28, pp. 66-76, 2018 (in Chinese).
  20. [20] R. Li and G. C. K. Leung, “Coal consumption and economic growth in China,” Energy Policy, Vol.40, pp. 438-443, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.034
  21. [21] Z. X. Zhang, H. R. Huang, and L. Lin, “Research on the Relationship Among Trade Openness, Economic Growth and Carbon Emissions-Empirical Analysis Based on the ‘Belt and Road’ Countries,” Soft Science, Vol.35, pp. 44-48, 2021 (in Chinese).
  22. [22] Y. L. Xi and G. M. Niu, “An Empirical Study on the Relationship Between CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth: Based on Evidence from International Panel Data,” Modern Management Science, pp. 13-25, 2021 (in Chinese).
  23. [23] W. T. Gu, J. Wang, X. Hua, and Z. Liu, “Entrepreneurship, and high-quality economic development: Based on the triple bottom line of sustainable development,” Int. Entrepreneurship and Management J., Vol.17, pp. 1-27, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00684-9
  24. [24] W. T. Gu and J. Y. Wang, “Research on index construction of sustainable entrepreneurship and its impact on economic growth,” J. of Business Research, Vol.142, pp. 266-276, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.060
  25. [25] R. Radmehr, S. R. Henneberry, and S. Shayanmehr, “Renewable Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions, and Economic Growth Nexus: A Simultaneity Spatial Modeling Analysis of EU Countries,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol.57, pp. 13-27, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.01.006
  26. [26] M. M. Rahman, “Environmental degradation: The role of electricity consumption, economic growth and globalisation,” J. of Environmental Management, Vol.253, Article No.109742, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109742
  27. [27] T. S. Adebayo, A. A. Awosusi, G. D. Kirikkaleli, G. D. Akinsola, and M. M. Mwamba, “Can CO2 emissions and energy consumption determine the economic performance of South Korea? A time series analysis,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol.28, No.29, pp. 38969-38984, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13498-1
  28. [28] M. Mohsin, S. Naseem, M. Sarfraz, and T. Azam, “Assessing the effects of fuel energy consumption, foreign direct investment and GDP on CO2 emission: New data science evidence from Europe & Central Asia,” Fuel, Vol.314, Article No.123098, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.123098
  29. [29] Y. Yuan and X. T. Sun, “Exploring the relationship between urbanization, industrial structure, energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions: An empirical study based on the heterogeneity of inter-provincial income levels in China,” Climate Change Research, Vol.16, No.6, pp. 738-747, 2020. https://doi.org/10.12006/j.issn.1673-1719.2019.192
  30. [30] M. X. Zhao, L. H. Lv, B. L. Zhang, and H. Luo, “Dynamic relationship between energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in China,” Research of Environmental Sciences, Vol.34, pp. 1509-1522, 2021 (in Chinese).
  31. [31] K. K. Khan, M. I. Khan, and M. Rehan, “The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan,” Financial Innovation, Vol.6, Article No.1, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-019-0162-0
  32. [32] M. Sikder, C. Wang, X. X. Yao, H. Xu, L. M. Wu, F. KwameYeboah, J. Wood, Y. L. Zhao, and X. C. Dou, “The integrated impact of GDP growth, industrialization, energy use, and urbanization on CO2 emissions in developing countries: Evidence from the panel ARDL approach,” Science of The Total Environment, Vol.837, Article No.155795, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155795
  33. [33] M. M. Islam, M. K. Khan, M. Tareque, N. Jehan, and V. Dagar, “Impact of globalization, foreign direct investment, and energy consumption on CO2 emissions in Bangladesh: Does institutional quality matter?,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol.28, pp. 48851-48871, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13441-4
  34. [34] F. T. Wang, K. Fang, and C. Yu, “Decoupling Between Industrial Energy-Related Carbon Emissions and Economic Growth and its Driving Factors in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei Urban Agglomeration-Empirical Study Based on Tapio Decoupling and LMDI Model,” J. of Industrial Technological Economics, Vol.38, pp. 32-40, 2019 (in Chinese).
  35. [35] L. Y. Wang, X. P. Chen, and J. X. Pang, “Decomposition and Scenario Analysis of Carbon Emission from Energy Consumption Based on LMDI Method: Taking Lanzhou as an Example,” Ecological Economy, Vol.35, pp. 38-44, 2019 (in Chinese).
  36. [36] J. L. Sui, B. Y. Liu, and J. Q. Liu, “The intrinsic associative mechanism between industrial economic growth and industrial pollution in China,” Resources Science, Vol.40, No.4, pp. 862-873, 2018 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.18402/resci.2018.04.19
  37. [37] H. M. Krolzig, “Markov Switching Vector Autoregressions: Modeling, Statistical Inference and Application to Business Cycles Analysis,” Springer, 1997.
  38. [38] J. Stock, C. Sims, and M. Watson, “Inference in Linear Time Series Models with Some Unit Roots,” Econometrica, Vol.58, No.1, pp. 113-144, 1990.
  39. [39] C. Sulaiman and A. S. Abdul-Rahim, “The relationship between CO2 emission, energy consumption and economic growth in Malaysia: A three-way linkage approach,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol.24, pp. 25204-25220, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0092-1
  40. [40] N. Ahmad, L. S. Du, J. Y. Lu, J. L. Wang, H. Z. Li, and M. Z. Hashmi, “Modelling the CO2 emissions and economic growth in Croatia: Is there any environmental Kuznets curve?,” Energy, Vol.123, pp. 164-172, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.106
  41. [41] A. Omri, D. K. Nguyen, and C. Rault, “Causal interactions between CO2 emissions, FDI, and economic growth: Evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equation models,” Economic Modelling, Vol.42, pp. 382-389, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.026
  42. [42] Y. F. Cai, C. Y. Sam, and T. Chang, “Nexus between clean energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions,” J. of Cleaner Production, Vol.182, pp. 1001-1011, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.035
  43. [43] A. O. Adewuyi and O. B. Awodumi, “Renewable and non-renewable energy-growth-emissions linkages: Review of emerging trends with policy implications,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol.69, pp. 275-291, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.178
  44. [44] S. Farhani and I. Ozturk, “Causal relationship between CO2emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol.22, No.20, pp. 15663-15676, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4767-1
  45. [45] A. O. Acheampong, “Economic Growth, CO2 Emissions and Energy Consumption: What Causes What and Where?,” Energy Economics, Vol.74, pp. 677-692, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.022

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 05, 2024