JACIII Vol.27 No.6 pp. 1025-1036
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2023.p1025

Research Paper:

The Influence of Industrial Digitalization on the Quality Structure of the Labor Force: A Panel Threshold Model Based on Industrial Structure Upgrading

Zezhong Hao*, Xianrong Zhu**, and Xiuwu Zhang*,†

*Huaqiao University
No.668 Jimei Avenue, Jimei District, Xiamen, Fujian 361021, China

Corresponding author

**Hangzhou Branch, Zhejiang Communication Industry Service Co., Ltd.
No.99 Tai’an Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, China

January 24, 2023
March 28, 2023
November 20, 2023
industrial digitalization, labor structure, industrial structure upgrading, dynamic panel model, threshold effect model

The rapid development of China’s digital economy has promoted industrial structure upgrading and further affected the quality structure of the labor force across industries. This study conducts a theoretical derivation by building a task-based theoretical model and uses panel data of 30 Chinese provinces from 2001 to 2020 to conduct empirical research on the relationship between industrial digitalization, industrial structure upgrading, and structural changes in labor quality. The study results show that industrial digitalization and industrial structure upgrade affect changes in the quality structure of China’s industrial labor. The industrial structure upgrading index plays a mediating role in influencing industrial digitalization on the educational structure of labor employment. When industrial structure upgrading is considered as the threshold variable, the impact of industrial digitalization on the employment and educational structure of different labor forces in China’s industries has diverse threshold characteristics. In the process of digital industrial development, China needs to focus on protecting labor with secondary education at different stages of digital development and accelerate the development of a skilled labor force to drive the high-quality development of China’s industrial economy.

Cite this article as:
Z. Hao, X. Zhu, and X. Zhang, “The Influence of Industrial Digitalization on the Quality Structure of the Labor Force: A Panel Threshold Model Based on Industrial Structure Upgrading,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.27 No.6, pp. 1025-1036, 2023.
Data files:
  1. [1] J. Tinbergen, “Substitution of graduate by other labour,” Kyklos, Vol.27, No.2, pp. 217-226, 1974.
  2. [2] D. Tapscott, “The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence,” McGraw-Hill, 1996.
  3. [3] D. H. Autor, L. F. Katz, and A. B. Krueger, “Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market?,” The Quarterly J. of Economics, Vol.113, No.4, pp. 1169-1213, 1998.
  4. [4] D. Acemoglu, “Changes in unemployment and wage inequality: An alternative theory and some evidence,” American Economic Review, Vol.89, No.5, pp. 1259-1278, 1999.
  5. [5] D. Acemoglu and D. Autor, “Chapter 12 – Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings,” D. Cord and O. Ashenfelter (Eds.), “Handbook of Labor Economics,” Vol.4, Part B, pp. 1043-1171, Elsevier, 2011.
  6. [6] D. Acemoglu and P. Restrepo, “The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment,” American Economic Review, Vol.108, No.6, pp. 1488-1542, 2018.
  7. [7] D. Acemoglu and P. Restrepo, “Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor,” J. of Economic Perspectives, Vol.33, No.2, pp. 3-30, 2019.
  8. [8] J. Liebenau, “Labor markets in the digital economy: Modeling employment from the bottom-up,” L. Pupillo, E. Noam, and L. Waverman (Eds.), “Digitized Labor: The Impact of the Internet on Employment,” pp. 71-93, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
  9. [9] E. Sadovaya, “Digital economy and a new paradigm of the labor market,” World Economy and Int. Relations, Vol.62, No.12, pp. 35-45, 2018.
  10. [10] E. Syarova, “Labor in the digital economy – A challenge or new opportunities,” Nauchni Trudove, Vol.2020, No.3, pp. 245-260, 2020 (in Bulgarian).
  11. [11] C. Cheng and H. Peng, “The mechanism of artificial intelligence affecting employment and china’s countermeasures,” China Soft Science, Vol.2018, No.10, pp. 62-70, 2018 (in Chinese).
  12. [12] M. Xie et al., “Artificial intelligence, technological change and low-skill employment: Empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms,” Chinese J. of Management Science, Vol.28, No.12, pp. 54-66, 2020 (in Chinese).
  13. [13] L. Yin and R. Wang, “The joys and sorrows of AI development,” People’s Tribune, Vol.2018, No.35, pp. 84-85, 2018 (in Chinese).
  14. [14] X. Qu and J. Cheng, “Changes of employment structure in China: Upgrading or polarization?,” Studies in Labor Economics, Vol.3, No.1, pp. 119-144, 2015 (in Chinese).
  15. [15] Q. Zhu and M. Li, “The development of artificial intelligence and the trend of the structure of the labor force in the future – Theory, evidence and strategy,” Reformation & Strategy, Vol.33, No.12, pp. 172-177, 2017 (in Chinese).
  16. [16] X. Li, “The impact of industrial robot technology progress on the employment structure of China’s manufacturing industry,” Modern Business, Vol.2019, No.22, pp. 45-46, 2019 (in Chinese).
  17. [17] B. Yang, “Research on the employment of agricultural transfer labor under the wave of intelligence,” J. of Fuzhou University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), Vol.31, No.2, pp. 51-58, 2017 (in Chinese).
  18. [18] Z. Sun and Y. Hou, “How does industrial intelligence reshape the employment structure of Chinese labor force,” China Industrial Economy, Vol.2019, No.5, pp. 61-79, 2019 (in Chinese).
  19. [19] W. Sun et al., “Analysis on technology upgrade and employment structure in China,” Economic Theory and Economic Management, Vol.2018, No.6, pp. 5-14, 2018 (in Chinese).
  20. [20] X. Deng and Z. Huang, “Analysis of the effect of artificial intelligence technology innovation on industry income gap – Empirical evidence from the Chinese industry level,” Soft Science, Vol.33, No.11, pp. 1-5+10, 2019 (in Chinese).
  21. [21] Y. Cai and N. Chen, “Artificial intelligence and high-quality growth & employment in the era of new technological revolution,” The J. of Quantitative & Technical Economics, Vol.36, No.5, pp. 3-22, 2019 (in Chinese).
  22. [22] D. Acemoglu and J.-S. Pischke, “Why do firms train? Theory and evidence,” The Quarterly J. of Economics, Vol.113, No.1, pp. 79-119, 1998.
  23. [23] D. Acemoglu and P. Restrepo, “Secular stagnation? The effect of aging on economic growth in the age of automation,” American Economic Review, Vol.107, No.5, pp. 174-179, 2017.
  24. [24] R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny, “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations,” J. of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.51, No.6, pp. 1173-1182, 1986.
  25. [25] Q. Wang et al., “A research on the effects of industrial intelligence on employment: Based on spatial econometric analysis of laborer’s skills and genders,” J. of Management World, Vol.38, No.10, pp. 110-126, 2022 (in Chinese).
  26. [26] X. Zhong, K. Hu, and D. Liu, “Digital economy enabling structural upgrading of service industry: Theoretical mechanism and empirical test,” Statistics & Decision, Vol.2023, No.12, pp. 11-16, 2023 (in Chinese).
  27. [27] L. Luo, Z. Zhang, and Q. Zhou, “Industrial intelligence and urban low-carbon economic transformation,” Economic Management, Vol.45, No.5, pp. 43-60, 2023 (in Chinese).
  28. [28] P. Topalova, “Trade liberalization and firm productivity: The case of India,” 2007.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Nov. 24, 2023