JACIII Vol.21 No.6 pp. 971-979
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2017.p0971


Analyzing the Functions and Benefits of Using Mobile Facebook as a Supplemental LMS in Higher Education

Dian-Fu Chang*1,†, Yu-Lan Huang*2,*3, and Berlin Wu*4

*1Graduate Institute of Educational Policy and Leadership, Tamkang University
No.151, Yingzhuan Road, Tamsui District, New Taipei City 25137, Taiwan

*2International Language and Culture Center, Yuan Zue University
No. 135, Yuan-Tung Road, Chung-Li District, Taoyuan City 32003, Taiwan

*3Doctoral Program of Educational Leadership and Technology Management, College of Education, Tamkang University
No.151, Yingzhuan Road, Tamsui District, New Taipei City 25137, Taiwan

*4National Chengchi University
No.64, Section 2, Zhinan Road, Wenshan District, Taipei City 11605, Taiwan

Corresponding author

December 15, 2016
March 31, 2017
October 20, 2017
social networking site (SNS), facebook, mobile app, learning management system (LMS), regression analysis

The wide implementation of social networking sites (SNS) in many fields, for instance, government, celebrities, schools, social groups, events promoted by national organizations or private enterprises, NPOs, businesses, etc., attests to its popularity. Currently more and more educators and students have integrated these online social communication platforms into their learning environment. Learning Management Systems (LMS) also have great features and functions that may serve as a bridge between learners and educators leading to better communication, in addition to helping students increase their learning engagement and teachers in evaluating learning performance. Although many studies have investigated the effects of adopting Facebook as an additional learning management system (LMS), its functions and benefits differing from the LMS have hardly been systematically analyzed. Besides, due to the increasing popularity of mobile devices among the younger generation, university students are obviously likely to use their smart phones to access both Facebook Mobile App and school LMS. Therefore, the first purpose of this study is to determine students’ opinions on mobile Facebook course groups and a mobile LMS course group, through a survey conducted after a 2-semester experiment. The other objective of this study is to evaluate the benefits of each function of mobile FB course groups that may strengthen the current weaknesses of LMS. In addition, regression analysis and t-test were used to reveal the relationships among variables: the FB functions and its benefits for FB course group. The findings might provide a clear notion for teachers regarding the functions and advantages contributed by a mobile FB course group which can be implemented as a supplemental learning system. The results of the research will provide university administrators with more detailed information for improving the LMS’ features or developing new LMS Apps.

Cite this article as:
D. Chang, Y. Huang, and B. Wu, “Analyzing the Functions and Benefits of Using Mobile Facebook as a Supplemental LMS in Higher Education,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.21 No.6, pp. 971-979, 2017.
Data files:
  1. [1] M. Erdem and P. N. Kibar, “Students’ opinions on Facebook supported blended learning environment,” TOJET, Vol.13, No.1, pp. 199-206, 2014.
  2. [2] H. Meishar-Tal, G. Kurtz, and E. Pieterse, “Facebook groups as LMS: A case study,” IRRODL, Vol.13, No.4, pp. 33-48, 2012.
  3. [3] [accessed Jun. 12, 2016]
  4. [4] [accessed Aug. 3, 2016]
  5. [5] M. Alrasheedi and L. F. Capretz, “Determination of critical success factors affecting mobile learning: A meta-analysis approach,” TOJET, Vol.14, No.2, pp. 41-51, 2015.
  6. [6] M. Szabo and K. Flesher, “CMI theory and practice: Historical roots of learning management systems,” In M. Driscoll & T. Reeves (eds.), Proc. of World Conf. on E-learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, White Paper, pp. 929-936, Montreal, Canada, 2002.
  7. [7] O. Pilli, “LMS vs. SNS: Can social networking sites act as learning management systems?” AIJCR, Vol.4, No.5, pp. 90-97, 2014.
  8. [8] S. A. David, “A critical understanding of learning management system,” Retrieved from [accessed Jan. 23, 2016], 2013.
  9. [9] J. Rŏzac, M. Poganik, A. Kos, F. Buenda, and J. V. Ballester, “Integration of learning management systems with social networking platforms,” The 4th Int. Conf. on Mobile, Hybrid, and Online Learning, pp. 100-105, 2012.
  10. [10] F. P. Taylor, “Education technology helps unite school communities, improve academic achievement,” T.H.E. J., Vol.31, No.10, pp. 46-48, 2004.
  11. [11] C. Dalsgaard, “Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems,” European J. of Open, Distance and E-Learning, Retrieved from [accessed May. 28, 2016], 2006.
  12. [12] S. Usui, F. Toriumi, M. Matsuo, T. Hirayama, and K. Mase, “Greedy Network Growth Model of Social Network Service,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform. (JACIII), Vol.18, No.4, pp. 590-597, 2014.
  13. [13] N. Selwyn, “Faceworking: Exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook,” Learning Media and Technology, Vol.34, No.2, pp. 157-174, 2009.
  14. [14] C. Pimmer, S. Linxen, and U. Gröhbiel, “Facebook as a learning tool? A case study on the appropriation of social network sites from mobile phones in developing countries,” BJET, Vol.43, No.5, pp. 726-738, 2012.
  15. [15] J. McCarthy, “Learning in Facebook: First year tertiary student reflections from 2008 to 2011,” AJET, Vol.29, No.3, pp. 337-356, 2013.
  16. [16] N. B. Ellison, C. Steinfield, and C. Lampe, “The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social networking sites,” JCMC, Vol.12, No. 4, pp. 1143-1168, 2007.
  17. [17] E. E. Smith, “A real double-edged sword: Undergraduate perceptions of social media in their learning,” Computers & Education, Vol.103, pp. 44-58, Retrieved from [accessed May 30, 2016], December 2016.
  18. [18] D. Boyd, “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications,” In Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, Zizi Papacharissi (ed.), pp. 39-58, 2010.
  19. [19] L. Eger, “Is Facebook a similar learning tool for university students as LMS?” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.203, No.26, pp. 233-238, 2015.
  20. [20] C. C. Barczyk, “Facebook in Higher Education Course: An analysis of students’ attitude, community of practice, and classroom community,” Int. Business & Management, Vol.6, No.1, pp. 1-11. 2013.
  21. [21] H. Jenkins, K. Clinton, R. Purushotoma, A. Robinson, and M. Weigel, “Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century,” Chicago, IL: The MacArthur Foundation, 2016.
  22. [22] S. Wheeler, P. Yeomans, and D. Wheeler, “The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student generated content as a collaborative learning tool,” BJET, Vol.39, No.6, pp. 987-995, 2008.
  23. [23] B. Chen and T. Bryer, “Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning,” IRRODL, Vol.13, No.1, pp. 87-104, 2012.
  24. [24] M. I. M. Eid and I. M. Al-Jabri, “Social networking, knowledge sharing, and student learning: The case of university students,” Computers & Education, Vol.99, pp. 14-27, 2016.
  25. [25] R. Gafni and M. Deri, “Costs and benefits of Facebook for undergraduate students,” IJIKM, Vol.7, pp. 45-61, 2012.
  26. [26] H. Farley, A. Murphy, C. Johnson, B. Carter, M. Lane, W. Midgley, A. Hafeez-Baig, S. Dekeyser, and A. Koronios, “How do students use their mobile devices to support learning? A case study from an Australian Regional University,” JIME, Vol.14, No.1, pp. 1-13, 2015.
  27. [27] S. G. Mazman and Y. K. Usluel, “Modeling educational usage of Facebook,” Computers and Education, Vol.55, No.2, pp. 444-453, 2010.
  28. [28] M. Erdem and P. N. Kibar, “Students’ opinions on Facebook supported blended learning environment,” TOJET, Vol.13, No.1, pp. 199-206, 2014.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on May. 19, 2024