single-jc.php

JACIII Vol.10 No.5 pp. 705-712
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2006.p0705
(2006)

Paper:

Views over last 60 days: 559

QoS Constrains Model: Establishing QoS Association for Ontology-Based Web Service Selection Mechanism

Laila Taher*, Rawshan Basha**, and Hazem El Khatib***

*Information Technology Department, Roads & Transport Authority, Dubai, P.O.Box 118899, United Arab Emirates

**Department of Computer Science, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, P.O.Box 27272, United Arab Emirates

***College of Information Technology, UAE University, Al Ain, P.O.Box 17555, United Arab Emirates

Received:
October 28, 2005
Accepted:
March 17, 2006
Published:
September 20, 2006
Creative Commons License
Keywords:
QoS, QoS-IC, QoS Manager, QoS-Constraints
Abstract

Quality of Service (QoS) is an important criterion for Web service selection. The work in this paper is based on QoS Information & Computation framework (QoS-IC) [1]. QoS-IC framework supports QoS-based service selection in Service Oriented Architecture (SOA), namely Web services. In this paper, we extend the functionality of QoS-IC framework with QoS-Constraints Model. QoS-Constraints establish an association relationship between different QoS properties and are used to govern the QoS-based service selection in the underlying algorithm. We have enhanced the algorithm to accommodate QoS-Constraints and discussed an experimental evaluation based on an implementation prototype that shows how QoS-Constraints introduce efficiency to the QoS-based service selection mechanism and save valuable time for consumers.

Cite this article as:
L. Taher, R. Basha, and H. Khatib, “QoS Constrains Model: Establishing QoS Association for Ontology-Based Web Service Selection Mechanism,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.10, No.5, pp. 705-712, 2006.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] L. Taher, R. Basha, and H. El Khatib, “A Framework and QoS Matchmaking Algorithm for Dynamic Web Services Selection,” Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT’05), 2005.
  2. [2] D. Box, D. Ehnebuske, G. Kakivaya, A. Layman, N. Mendelsohn, H. Nielsen, S. Thatte, and D. Winer, “Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.1,” W3C Note 08, W3C, Sep., 2004.
    http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/
  3. [3] E. Christensen, F. Curbera, G. Meredith, and S. Weerawarana, “Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1,” W3C Note 15, W3C, Sep., 2004.
    http://www.w3c.org/TR/wsdl
  4. [4] OASIS, “UDDI Version 3.0.1. UDDI Spec Technical Committee Specification,” Sep., 2004.
    http://uddi.org/pubs/uddi_v3.htm
  5. [5] F. Curbera, M. Duftler et al., “Unraveling the Web Services Web: An Introduction to SOAP, WSDL, and UDDI,” J. of the IEEE Internet Computing, 6-2, pp. 86-93, 2002.
  6. [6] A. Mani and A. Nagarajan, “Understanding quality of service for Web services,” 2002.
    http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-quality.html ,
    Jan., 2005.
  7. [7] Y. Liu, A. H. H. Ngu, and L. Zeng, “QoS Computation and Policing in Dynamic Web Service Selection,” Proc. of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), pp. 66-73, 2004.
  8. [8] D. Connolly, F. Harmelen, I. Horrocks, D. McGuinness, P. Schneider, and L. Stein, “DAML+OIL Reference Description,” 2001.
    http://www.w3.org/TR/daml+oil-reference ,
    Oct., 2004.
  9. [9] A. Ankolekar, M. Burstein, J. Hobbs, O. Lassila, D. Martin, D. Mc-Dermott, S. McIlraith, S. Narayanan, M. Paolucci, T. Payne, and K. Sycara, “DAML-S: Web Service Description for the Semantic Web,” Proc. of the 1st International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), pp. 348-363, 2002.
  10. [10] L. Taher, R. Basha et al., “QoS Information & Computation (QoSIC) Framework for QoS-Based Discovery of Web Services,” J. of the UPGRADE, 6-4, pp. 55-66, 2005.
  11. [11] M. Dunham, “Data Mining, Introductory and Advanced Topics,” Prentice Hall, 2003.
  12. [12] Z. Chen, C. Liang-Tien, B. Silverajan, and L. Bu-Sung, “UX – An Architecture Providing QoS-Aware and Federated Support for UDDI,” Proc. of the 2003 International Conference on Web Services (ICWS’03), pp. 171-176, 2003.
  13. [13] A. Ali, O. Rana, R. Al Ali, and D. Walker, “UDDIe: An Extended Registry for Web Services,” Proc. of the 2003 Symposium on Applications and InternetWorkshops (SAINT-w03), pp. 85-89, 2003.
  14. [14] S. Ran, “A Model for Web Services Discovery with QoS,” J. of the ACM SIGecom Exchanges, 4-1, pp. 1-10, 2003.
  15. [15] A. Keller and H. Ludwig (IBM), “The WSLA Framework: Specifying and Monitoring of Service Level Agreements for Web Services,” 2002.
    http://www.research.ibm.com/resources/paper_search.shtml ,
    Jan., 2005.
  16. [16] V. Tosic, B. Pagurek, K. Patel, B. Esfandiari, and W. Ma, “Management Applications of the Web Service Offerings Language (WSOL),” Proc. of the 15th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE’03), pp. 468-484, 2003.
  17. [17] D. Lamanna, J. Skene, andW. Emmerich, “SLAng: A language for defining Service Level Agreements,” Proc. of the 9th IEEE Workshop on Future Trends in Distributed Computing Systems – FTDCS 2003, pp. 100-106, 2003.
  18. [18] E. Maximilien and M. Singh, “A Framework and Ontology for Dynamic Web Services Selection,” J. of the IEEE Internet Computing, 8-5, pp. 84-93, 2004.
  19. [19] G. Luger and G. F. Luger, “Artificial Intelligence, Structures and Strategies for Complex Problem Solving,” Addison Wesley, 2005.
  20. [20] Apache, “juddi,” Jan., 2005.
    http://ws.apache.org/juddi/

Creative Commons License  This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Sep. 27, 2022