single-au.php

IJAT Vol.19 No.5 pp. 970-979
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2025.p0970
(2025)

Research Paper:

Surface Finishing Mechanisms of cBN Burnishing Tool Composed of Fine BN Grains for Hardened Die Steel

Koki Nakata*, Masato Okada**,† ORCID Icon, Hidehito Watanabe***, and Masahide Watanabe***

*Graduate School of Engineering, University of Fukui
3-9-1 Bunkyo, Fukui, Fukui 910-8507, Japan

**Faculty of Engineering, University of Fukui
Fukui, Japan

Corresponding author

***End Mill Engineering Department, Union Tool Co.
Mitsuke, Japan

Received:
January 6, 2025
Accepted:
July 17, 2025
Published:
September 5, 2025
Keywords:
sliding burnishing, surface finishing, surface profile, residual stress, hardened die steel
Abstract

Sliding burnishing process is a high-value-added finishing process that smooths the surface, hardens the surface layer, and adds compressive residual stress by sliding a hard tool across the target surface. It contributes to automation and improves quality in the die and mold polishing process. In this study, the mechanisms underlying surface finish generation by a cubic boron nitride (cBN) ball burnishing tool with a smooth tool surface composed of fine BN grains were clarified in comparison with a polycrystalline diamond (PCD) ball end mill, which generates a surface finish via a grinding effect. Additionally, the impact of tool posture and tool feed direction of the cBN ball burnishing tool relative to the target surface on the material flow morphology of the surface layer of the finished surface was analyzed. At the same tool pressing force, the depth of the processing marks obtained with the cBN ball burnishing tool was shallower than that obtained with the PCD ball end mill, and the compositional distribution of the surface material was less distinct than in the PCD one. Even with such a difference in the surface finish generation mechanisms, the surface roughness and residual stress of the surface finish obtained with the cBN ball burnishing tool were almost the same as those of the PCD ball end mill, indicating good surface finish quality. For the cBN ball burnishing tool, differences were observed in the flow morphology of the surface layer of the finished surface depending on the tool inclination angle to the target surface and the tool feed direction. By considering these effects of tool posture and tool feed direction, it was experimentally proven that surface roughness less below mathitRa=10 nm and high compressive residual stress can be achieved.

Cite this article as:
K. Nakata, M. Okada, H. Watanabe, and M. Watanabe, “Surface Finishing Mechanisms of cBN Burnishing Tool Composed of Fine BN Grains for Hardened Die Steel,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.19 No.5, pp. 970-979, 2025.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] R. Kitada, Q. Wang, S. Tsuetani, and A. Okada, “Influence of surface roughness of die sinking EDM on mold releasability in compression molding of thermosetting phenol resin,” Procedia CIRP, Vol.113, pp. 238-243, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.09.152
  2. [2] X. Wu and X. Yin, “Surface roughness analysis and parameter optimization of mold steel milling,” Procedia CIRP, Vol.71, pp. 317-321, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.05.032
  3. [3] H. Yamazaki, J. Zhu, and T. Tanaka, “Study on the surface enhancement of thin-walled metallic materials using a novel double-side burnishing tool,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.17, pp. 458-468, 2023. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2023.p0458
  4. [4] C. Cao, J. Zhu, and T. Tanaka, “Investigation of corrosion resistance enhancement for biodegradable magnesium alloy by ball burnishing process,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.14, No.2, pp. 175-183, 2020. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2020.p0175
  5. [5] C. Cao, J. Zhu, T. Tanaka, F.-J. Shiou, S. Sawada, and H. Yoshioka, “Ball burnishing of Mg alloy using a newly developed burnishing tool with on-machine force control,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.13, No.5, pp. 619-630, 2019. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2019.p0619
  6. [6] M. Okada, M. Shinya, H. Matsubara, H. Kozuka, H. Tachiya, N. Asakawa, and M. Otsu, “Development and characterization of diamond tip burnishing with a rotary tool,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol.244, pp. 106-115, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.01.020
  7. [7] M. Okada, M. Shinya, K. Takasugi, H. Tachiya, T. Sasaki, and M. Otsu, “Driven rotary tool burnishing with coated carbide tool – Influence of tool surface characteristics on burnished surface characteristics and clarification of tool wear behavior –,” J. Jpn. Soc. Precis. Eng., Vol.83, No.7, pp. 694-700, 2017 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2493/jjspe.83.694
  8. [8] M. Okada, R. Fujii, H. Watanabe, and M. Nikawa, “Cutting performance of cBN ball-nose end mill with burnishing face in finishing of hardened die steel,” Proc. 2022 Int. Conf. Precis. Eng., C013, 2022.
  9. [9] N. Sugita, K. Nishioka, and M. Mitsuishi, “Ultra-precision machining of tungsten-based alloys by cutting and burnishing,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.5, No.3, pp. 320-325, 2011. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2011.p0320
  10. [10] P. Kasuriya, T. Watanabe, T. Goto, and M. Jin, “Study on chip removal mechanism of PCD ball-end milling (1st report) cutting simulation by orthogonal cutting,” Prod. Manuf. Res., Vol.8, pp. 486-495, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2020.1862721
  11. [11] P. Kasuriya, T. Watanabe, T. Goto, and M. Jin, “Mirror surface finishing of hardened stainless steel using spherical PCD tool,” Precis. Eng., Vol.74, pp. 163-174, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.11.003
  12. [12] K. Nakata, M. Okada, H. Watanabe, and M. Watanabe, “Mechanism of surface finishing of hardened stainless steel by cBN ball burnishing tool,” Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Mater. Mech. Technol., pp. 255-257, 2024.
  13. [13] M. Dix and M. Posdzich, “Force-controlled burnishing process for high surface integrity on additive manufactured parts,” Procedia CIRP, Vol.108, pp. 642-647, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.03.101
  14. [14] M. Okada, H. Kozuka, H. Tachiya, T. Iwasaki, and Y. Yamashita, “Burnishing process by the spherical 5-degrees hybrid type parallel mechanism with force control,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.8, No.2, pp. 243-252, 2014. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2014.p0243
  15. [15] S. Świrad, D. Wydrzynski, P. Nieslony, and G. M. Krolczyk, “Influence of hydrostatic burnishing strategy on the surface topography of martensitic steel,” Meas., Vol.138, pp. 590-601, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.081
  16. [16] R. Stöckmann, M. Posdzich, P. Klimant, and M. Putz, “Influence of the stiffness of burnishing tools on process force and surface quality of EN AW-2007 and C45 workpieces,” Procedia Manuf., Vol.43, pp. 635-641, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.142
  17. [17] F. J. Shiou, S. J. Huang, A. J. Shih, J. Zhu, and M. Yoshino, “Fine surface finish of a hardened stainless steel using a new burnishing tool,” Procedia Manuf., Vol.10, pp. 208-217, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.048
  18. [18] M. Korzynski, J. Lubas, S. Swirad, and K. Dudek, “Surface layer characteristics due to slide diamond burnishing with a cylindrical-ended tool,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol.211, pp. 84-89, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.08.029
  19. [19] Y. Fukushima, M. Mori, and M. Katsurasawa, “To achieve stable mirror finishing by PCD ball end mill,” Proc. 2023 Conf. Die Mould Technol., pp. 214-215, 2023 (in Japanese).
  20. [20] M. Okada, Y. Yoshino, M. Nikawa, K. Yanagi, and T. Sasaki, “On-machine surface finishing of aluminum injection mold by sliding burnishing process with active rotary tool,” Trans. JSME, Vol.87, Article No.21-00037, 2021 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.1299/transjsme.21-00037
  21. [21] S. K. Das and S. S. Gautam, “A comprehensive isogeometric analysis of frictional Hertz contact problem,” Tribol. Int., Vol.200, Article No.110078, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2024.110078

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Sep. 05, 2025