At present, the research endeavors aim to enhance the quality of large-scale three-dimensional objects such as automobile bodies through precision chemical-mechanical polishing. However, these objects often exceed the polishing pad diameters, requiring the pads to traverse over the object’s surface. Further, polishing devices cannot easily prevent slurry dispersion, creating a demand for specialized slurry formulations to polish large-scale objects. This study assessed the impact of slurry drying properties on the polishing characteristics of large-scale objects during traverse polishing with small-diameter pads. We formulated three types of slurries with distinct drying properties and investigated the distribution of polishing amounts for each slurry. In addition, we examined the slurry behavior by visualizing the contact interface and determining the correlations between them. The results revealed that the slurry-holding capability of pad significantly influences the polishing characteristics; specifically, the pad could retain slurries with strong drying properties. Furthermore, the spread rate on the pad surface can serve as an evaluation metric for its slurry-holding capacity, and a slurry with a low spread rate is correlated with a high distribution of material removal. This study lays the foundation for developing optimized slurry formulations and polishing methods that save time and cost in high-quality industrial applications.

1. [1] M. Matsuzawa, S. Yanai, M. Nunobiki, and S. Torizuka, “Digitalization, visualization and analysis of buffing technology,” J. of the Japan Society for Abrasive Technology, Vol.65, No.6, pp. 315-322, 2021 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11420/jsat.65.315
2. [2] T. Mikami, “Practical apply of precision finishing robot system and the future trend of development,” J. of the Robotics Society of Japan, Vol.34, No.10, pp. 676-679, 2016 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.7210/jrsj.34.676
3. [3] K. Hayashi, H. Ueno, and H. Murakami, “Development of precision finishing robot system,” Trans. of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, Vol.51, No.1, pp. 32-40, 2015 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.9746/sicetr.51.32
4. [4] F. Tian, Z. Li, C. Lv, and G. Liu, “Polishing pressure investigations of robot automatic polishing on curved surfaces,” The Int. J. of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.87, No.1, pp. 639-646, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8527-2
5. [5] K. Ito et al., “High precision polishing robot based on a hybrid actuator system,” The Proc. of Conf. of Tokai Branch, The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol.69, Article No.421, 2020 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmetokai.2020.69.421
6. [6] R. Zhu et al., “Hybrid orientation/force control for robotic polishing with a 2R1T force-controlled end-effector,” The Int. J. of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.121, No.3, pp. 2279-2290, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09407-6
7. [7] V. Girbés-Juan et al., “Combining haptics and inertial motion capture to enhance remote control of a dual-arm robot,” J. on Multimodal User Interfaces, Vol.16, No.2, pp. 219-238, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-021-00386-8
8. [8] P. Zhou, Y. Zhou, Q. Xie, and H. Zhao, “Adaptive force control for robotic grinding of complex blades,” IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol.692, Article No.012008, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/692/1/012008
9. [9] H. Morinaga and K. Tamai, “Polishing technology for 3D shapes / various materials,” J. of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, Vol.84, No.3, pp. 235-238, 2018 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2493/jjspe.84.235
10. [10] X. Liang, I. Mohsin, Y. Xu, C. Yan, and K. He, “Robotic polishing of the meat grinder blade under path planning and controlled force,” IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol.790, Article No.012158, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/790/1/012158
11. [11] M. Schneckenburger, R. Almeida, S. Höfler, I. Braga, and R. Börret, “Monitoring and meaning of vibrations in robot polishing,” J. of the European Optical Society-Rapid Publications, Vol.19, No.1, Article No.11, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1051/jeos/2023007
12. [12] L. Wang, P. Zhou, Y. Yan, C. Hou, and D. Guo, “Micro-scale contact behavior and its effect on the material removal process during chemical mechanical polishing,” Tribology Int., Vol.156, Article No.106831, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106831
13. [13] M. Uneda, N. Kubo, M. Hatatani, K. Hotta, and H. Morinaga, “Analysis of the material removal mechanism in chemical mechanical polishing with in-situ macroscale nonwoven pad contact interface observation using an evanescent field,” Precision Engineering, Vol.82, pp. 281-289, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2023.04.002
14. [14] H. Tao, Q. Zeng, Y. Liu, D. Zhao, and X. Lu, “Effects of grinding-induced surface topography on the material removal mechanism of silicon chemical mechanical polishing,” Applied Surface Science, Vol.631, Article No.157509, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157509