The current badminton shuttlecock products are highly ineffective. The bird feather shuttlecocks used in official competitions have an unsustainably high change count due to rapid breakage from repeated racquet strikes. Meanwhile, the current synthetic shuttlecocks lack the structural properties of their feather counterparts to produce the desired aerodynamics as a projectile. This study discusses two material testing methods: the feather compression and hysteresis test, which can provide relevant mechanical data to be incorporated into the manufacturing process of future synthetic shuttlecocks. The compressive moduli from six feather shuttlecock products (four goose and two duck) were compared using the proposed methods at the strain rate of 1.15 mm/60 s. Subsequently, a three-cycle hysteresis test was conducted at an increasing strain rate of 1.15 mm/120 s, 1.15 mm/80 s, and 1.15 mm/60 s. The compression results were comparable to those from previous studies; however, there are currently no hysteresis data of shuttlecock feathers were available for comparison. The proposed methods have the potential to provide vital mechanical data that should be taken into account for future synthetic shuttlecock designs.

1. [1] RSL International, “RSL Badminton - Feather Processing,” YouTube, Published online February 3, 2009. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiAdro2SwvU [Accessed May 1, 2024]
2. [2] W. H. Chen, “How to distinguish between feather shapes of a badminton shuttlecock,” 2013. http://www.chenwuhua.com/archives/509 [Accessed November 20, 2023]
3. [3] China Network Television, “Badminton from a different perspective,” 2011. http://sports.cntv.cn/20110421/104877.shtml [Accessed June 6, 2023]
4. [4] Taneepak, “Question about the Shuttlecocks,” July 27, 2005. https://tinyurl.com/taneepak-2005 [Accessed May 9, 2024]
5. [5] G. Willis, “Improvements in Shuttlecock,” 1996. https://tinyurl.com/WO1996031260A2 [Accessed June 6, 2023]
6. [6] R. Subramaniyan, “Effect of local conditions on the flight trajectory of an indoor badminton shuttlecock,” Dissertation, Bangalore University, 2008.
7. [7] R. H. C. Bonser and P. P. Purslow, “The Young’s modulus of feather keratin,” J. of Experimental Biology, Vol.198, Issue 4, pp. 1029-1033, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.198.4.1029
8. [8] T. M. T. Woo, A. Kootsookos, and F. Alam, “A correlation study on the game of badminton and techniques on shuttlecock durability,” Scientific J. of Sport and Performance, Vol.3, No.3, pp. 417-432, 2024. https://doi.org/10.55860/NWQD7090
9. [9] A. J. Cooke, “The aerodynamics and mechanics of shuttlecocks,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge, 1992.
10. [10] F. Alam, C. Nutakom, and H. Chowdhury, “Effect of Porosity of Badminton Shuttlecock on Aerodynamic Drag,” Procedia Engineering, Vol.112, pp. 430-435, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.220
11. [11] T. M. T. Woo and F. Alam, “Comparative aerodynamics of synthetic badminton shuttlecocks,” Sports Engineering, Vol.21, No.1, pp. 21-29, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-017-0241-2
12. [12] M. Fargnoli, “Design process optimization for ecodesign,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.3, No.1, pp. 33-39, 2009. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2009.p0033
13. [13] J. T. Cheung and M. Zhang, “Mechanics of the human skin and underlying soft tissues,” Y. Li and X.-Q. Dai (Eds.), “Biomechanical engineering of textiles and clothing,” pp. 111-124, Elsevier, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845691486.2.111
14. [14] N. Özkaya, M. Nordin, and D. Goldsheyder, “Mechanical Properties of Biological Tissues,” “Fundamentals of Biomechanics: Equilibrium, Motion, and Deformation,” pp. 221-236, Springer-Verlag, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1150-5
15. [15] S. Chaterjee, D. Adams, and D. W. Oplinger, “Test Methods for Composites a Status Report Volume II: Compression Test Methods,” DOT/FAA/CT-93/17, II; June 1, 1993. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA273522.pdf [Accessed July 4, 2023]
16. [16] P. J. Minguet, M. J. Fedro, and C. K. Gunther, “Test Methods for Textile Composites,” NASA Contractor Report 4609, 1994. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19950006380/downloads/19950006380.pdf [Accessed May 9, 2024]
17. [17] J. E. Masters, “Test methods for textile composite materials,” NASA Contractor Report 198285, pp. 14-17, 1996. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19960015568/downloads/19960015568.pdf [Accessed May 9, 2024]
18. [18] K. Schelestow, O. P. Troncoso, and F. G. Toores, “Failure of flight feathers under uniaxial compression,” Materials Sciences and Engineering: C, Vol.78, pp. 923-931, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.146
19. [19] H. J. Qi, and M. C. Boyce, “Stress-strain behavior of thermoplastic polyurethane,” Mechanics of Materials, Vol.37, Issue 8, pp. 817-839, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2004.08.001
20. [20] N. Dhali and F. Bulbul, “Comparison on Trapezoidal and Simpson’s Rule for unequal data space,” Int. J. of Mathematical Sciences and Computing, Vol.5, No.4, pp. 33-43, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmsc.2019.04.04
21. [21] M. F. Alzoubi, E. Y. Tanbour, and R. Al-Waked, “Compression and hysteresis curves of nonlinear polyurethane foams under different densities, strain rates and different environmental conditions,” ASME 2011 Int. Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, pp. 101-109, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2011-62290
22. [22] ExcelWorks LLC, “How to compute integrals in Excel,” Numerical Integration Functions in Excel, 2020. https://excel-works.com/manual/integration [Accessed December 13, 2023]
23. [23] Y. Konishi, Y. Matsushima, T. Misaka, H. Okuizumi, K. Tanaka, and S. Obayashi, “Effect of camber on badminton shuttlecock,” 12th Conf. of the Int. Sports Engineering Association, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, Vol.2, Issue 6, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060266