IJAT Vol.15 No.6 pp. 878-884
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2021.p0878


Flexible Fiber Conditioner for Fine Conditioning of Polishing Pad and its Evaluation in Chemical Mechanical Polishing: Verification of SUS-FFC on Soft Urethane Foam Pad and Proposal of PEEK-FFC

Michio Uneda*,†, Naoki Takahashi*, Takashi Fujita**, and Yutaro Arai***

*Kanazawa Institute of Technology
3-1 Yatsukaho, Hakusan, Ishikawa 924-0838, Japan

Corresponding author

**Kindai University, Higashi-Osaka, Japan

***Showa Industries International Co., Ltd., Hirakata, Japan

April 19, 2021
June 17, 2021
November 5, 2021
flexible fiber conditioner (FFC), SUS and PEEK, diamond disk conditioner (DDC), soft and hard urethane pad, removal rate

Polishing pad conditioning is essential for achieving stable chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). While diamond disk conditioners (DDCs) are often applied, flexible fiber conditioners (FFCs) have been proposed as a new conditioning tool. FFCs are intended for roughening the pad surface appropriately by bundling fine wire fibers. Our previous study demonstrated the fine conditioning characteristics of FFCs for a hard urethane foam pad. In this study, the conditioning characteristics of an FFC are compared with those of a DDC. First, we evaluate the conditioning performance of an FFC using SUS fibers on a soft urethane foam pad. The result indicates that on a soft pad, the SUS-FFC can restore the pad surface asperities more finely, as confirmed via the stabilized number of contact points based on contact image and luminance value distribution analyses. Subsequently, for a metal-contamination-free FFC process intended for semiconductor CMP, we develop an FFC fabricated using polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and verify its performance via the CMP test of a silicon oxide film. It is shown that the hard pad can be conditioned using the developed PEEK-FFC; this implies that a stable removal rate can be realized immediately after pad break-in conditioning.

Cite this article as:
M. Uneda, N. Takahashi, T. Fujita, and Y. Arai, “Flexible Fiber Conditioner for Fine Conditioning of Polishing Pad and its Evaluation in Chemical Mechanical Polishing: Verification of SUS-FFC on Soft Urethane Foam Pad and Proposal of PEEK-FFC,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.15 No.6, pp. 878-884, 2021.
Data files:
  1. [1] W. Izumiya, “A thorough report on investment plans for the semiconductor industry, which is entering an unprecedented boom – A huge market of 100 trillion yen approaching in the 5G revolution – (in Japanese),” Proc. of 187th Meeting of Planarization CMP Committee, pp. 41-54, 2021.
  2. [2] S. Kurokawa, “The overview and future prospects for planarization CMP technology,” J. of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, Vol.84, No.3, pp. 213-216, 2018.
  3. [3] N. B. Kenchappa, R. Popuri, A. Chockkalingam, P. Jawali, S. Jayanath, D. Redfield, and R. Bajaj, “Soft chemical mechanical polishing pad for oxide CMP applications,” ECS J. of Solid State Science and Technology, Vol.10, 014008, 2021.
  4. [4] G. B. Basim and B. M. Moudgil, “Slurry design for chemical mechanical polishing,” KONA Powder and Particle J., Vol.21, pp. 178-184, 2003.
  5. [5] M. Uneda, “Polishing mechanism analysis based on visualizing of consumables effect,” J. of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, Vol.84, No.3, pp. 225-229, 2018.
  6. [6] R. K. Singh, A. Galpin, and C. Vroman, “Development and performance data of a new CVD diamond CMP pad conditioner,” Application Note, Entegris, pp. 1-5, 2013.
  7. [7] C. Shin, H. Qin, S. Hong, S. Jeon, A. Kulkarni, and T. Kim, “Effect of conditioner load on the polishing pad surface during chemical mechanical planarization process,” J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol.30, No.12, pp. 5659-5665, 2016.
  8. [8] S. Kim, N. Saka, and J. H. Chun, “The Effect of pad-asperity curvature on material removal rate in chemical-mechanical polishing,” Procedia CIRP, Vol.14, pp. 42-47, 2014.
  9. [9] L. J. Borucki, T. Witelski, C. Please, P. R. Kramer, and D. Schwendeman, “A theory of pad conditioning for chemical-mechanical polishing,” J. of Engineering Mathematics, Vol.50, pp. 1-24, 2004.
  10. [10] N. Suzuki and Y. Hashimoto, “Development of accurate prediction technology of material removal rates distribution in planarization CMP,” J. of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, Vol.84, No.3, pp. 221-224, 2018.
  11. [11] B. Park, S. Jeong, H. Lee, H. Kim, H. Jeong, and D. A. Dornfeld, “Experimental investigation of material removal characteristics in silicon chemical mechanical polishing,” Japanese J. of Applied Physics, Vol.48, 116505, 2009.
  12. [12] T. Fujita, T. Doi, D. Kamikawa, and J. Watanabe, “Development on pad conditioning conforming to pad surface – Development of flexible fiber conditioner and evaluation on conditioning uniformity –,” J. of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, Vol.76, No.4, pp. 433-437, 2010.
  13. [13] M. Uneda, N. Takahashi, Y. Arai, and T. Fujita, “Effectiveness of novel pad dressing method by flexible fiber dresser,” J. of the Japan Society for Abrasive Technology, Vol.59, No.8, pp. 459-464, 2015.
  14. [14] M. Uneda, Y. Maeda, K. Ishikawa, K. Ichikawa, T. Doi, T. Yamazaki, and H. Aida, “Relationships between contact image analysis results for pad surface texture and removal rate in CMP,” J. of The Electrochemical Society, Vol.159, No.2, pp. H90-H95, 2012.
  15. [15] T. Akagami and M. Kawabata, “Effects of counterface surface roughness on friction and wear of PEEK materials under oil-lubricated conditions,” Tribology, Vol.11, No.3, pp. 494-502, 2016.
  16. [16] S. Najeeb, M. S. Zafar, Z. Khurshid, and F. Siddiqui, “Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics,” J. of Prosthodontic Research, Vol.60, pp. 12-19, 2016.
  17. [17] X. Ling, X. Jing, C. Zhang, and S. Chen, “Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) properties and its application status,” IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol.453, 012080, 2020.
  18. [18] JIS G4304 (Hot-rolled stainless steel plate, sheet and strip).
  19. [19] VICTREX PEEK Coating Technology: VICOTE High Temperature Performance Coating.
  20. [20] Nitta DuPont Incorporated: IC1000.
  21. [21] J. McAllister, C. Stuffle, Y. Sampurno, D. Hetherington, J. S. Suarez, L. Borucki, and A. Philipossian, “Effect of conditioner type and downforce, and pad surface micro-texture on SiO2 chemical mechanical planarization performance,” Microelectronics, Vol.10, No.258, pp. 1-8, 2019.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jul. 23, 2024