IJAT Vol.15 No.1 pp. 99-108
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2021.p0099


Effect of Ultrafine Bubbles on Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Staphylococcus Aureus During Sterilization of Machining Fluid

Hiroko Yamada*,†, Kensuke Konishi**, Keita Shimada**, Masayoshi Mizutani**, and Tsunemoto Kuriyagawa*

*Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University
6-6-01 Aramaki Aza-Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8579, Japan

Corresponding author

**Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan

May 29, 2020
November 2, 2020
January 5, 2021
ultrafine bubbles, sterilization, water-soluble machining fluid, pseudomonas aeruginosa

Bacterial growth is one of the common causes of putrefaction and deterioration of water-soluble machining fluid. The 16S ribosomal DNA metagenome analysis of the bacterial species composing the microbial flora present in the machining fluid derived after processing demonstrated a high amount of species belonging to the Pseudomonas genus. Therefore, we prepared two types of ultrafine bubbles water (gas species: air and CO2) containing different types of gas and confirmed the bactericidal effect on Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 10145), a typical Pseudomonas species. The grinding fluid was prepared using sterile purified water containing ultrafine bubbles (hereafter referred to as UFB) as diluted water, and the Pseudomonas aeruginosa was inoculated to obtain 106 CFU/mL. The sterilization rate of the number of bacteria was determined immediately after immersion in each fluid and subsequently after two hours. The sterilization rate was determined to be 100% in the test group using the ultrafine bubbles water of CO2 (CO2-UFB water). As a comparative control, a similar test was performed on Staphylococcus aureus IFO12732, and the sterilization rate was determined as 0%. Fluorescence microscopic observation of bacteria after immersion in the CO2-UFB water demonstrated damage to the cell wall as the cause of death of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Therefore, CO2-UFB demonstrated sterilization of machining fluid by killing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the machining fluid. The bactericidal mechanism of UFB involved the induction of damage in bacterial cell walls. This can be attributed to crushing due to the increase in the particle size of UFB.

Cite this article as:
H. Yamada, K. Konishi, K. Shimada, M. Mizutani, and T. Kuriyagawa, “Effect of Ultrafine Bubbles on Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Staphylococcus Aureus During Sterilization of Machining Fluid,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.15 No.1, pp. 99-108, 2021.
Data files:
  1. [1] F. P. Ferraz de Campos, A. Felipe-Silva et al., “Community-acquired Pseudomonas aeruginosa-pneumonia in a previously healthy man occupationally exposed to metalworking fluids,” Autops Case Rep., Vol.4, No.3, pp. 31-37, 2014.
  2. [2] N. Di Maiuta, A. Rufenacht, and P. Kuenzi, “Assessment of bacteria and archaea in metalworking fluids using massive parallel 16S rRNA gene tag sequencing,” Lett. Appl. Microbiol., Vol.65, No.4, pp. 266-273, 2017.
  3. [3] L. E. Maier, H. P. Lampel, T. Bhutani, and S. E. Jacob, “Hand dermatitis: a focus on allergic contact dermatitis to biocides,” Dermatol. Clin., Vol.27, pp. 251-264, 2009.
  4. [4] Asahi Research Center report (RS-1007), November 2016 (in Japanese).
  5. [5] M. Takahashi, “Environmental Improvement and Food Safety by Micro-Bubble Technology,” Bulletin of the Society of Sea Water Science, Japan, Vol.59, No.1, pp. 17-22, 2005 (in Japanese).
  6. [6] H. Ohnari, “The Characteristics and Possibilities of Micro Bubble Technology,” J. of MMIJ, Vol.123, No.3, pp. 89-96, 2007 (in Japanese).
  7. [7] R. Shibuya, “Application of Fine Bubbles,” J. of the Surface Finishing Society of Japan, Vol.68, No.6, pp. 335-337, 2017 (in Japanese).
  8. [8] K. Inazawa, H. Ohmori, and N. Itoh, “Effects of O2 Fine Bubbles on ELID Grinding Using Conductive Rubber Bond Grinding Wheel,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.13, No.5, pp. 657-664, 2019.
  9. [9] S. Ninomiya, T. Shimizu, M. Iwai, and K. Suzuki, “Purification effect of micro bubble coolant,” J. of Japan Society for Abrasive Technology, Vol.56, No.7, pp. 465-469, 2012 (in Japanese).
  10. [10] T. Q. Luu, P. N. Hong Truong, K. Zitzmann, and K. T. Nguyen, “Effects of Ultrafine Bubbles on Gram-Negative Bacteria: Inhibition or Selection?,” Langmuir, Vol.35, No.42, pp. 13761-13768, 2019.
  11. [11] H. Tsuge, “Fundamentals of Microbubbles and Nanobubbles,” Bulletin of the Society of Sea Water Science, Japan, Vol.64, No.1, pp. 4-10, 2010 (in Japanese).
  12. [12] [Accessed May 1, 2020]
  13. [13] [Accessed May 1, 2020]
  14. [14] A. Yauchi and K. Arima, “Cell wall of bacteria,” Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, Vol.2, No.10, pp. 674-682, 1974 (in Japanese).
  15. [15] T. Uehara, “Synthesis of Cell Wall on Bacterial Morphosis,” The J. of Biochemistry, Vol.85, No.5, pp. 349-353, 2013 (in Japanese).
  16. [16] [Accessed May 1, 2020]
  17. [17] N. Yamaguchi and M. Nasu, “Flow cytometric analysis of bacterial respiratory enzymatic activity in the natural aquatic environment,” J. of Appl. Microbiol., Vol.83, pp. 43-52, 1997.
  18. [18] R. Sakazaki, “Bacteriology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Media-Circle, Vol.10, pp. 281-289, 1965 (in Japanese).
  19. [19] T. Higuchi, “New Method for Overcoming Drug Resistance,” Shikoku Acta Medica, Vol.58, No.3, pp. 107-121, 2002 (in Japanese).
  20. [20] S. Fukui, “Cell Wall of Bacteria,” J. of the Brewing Society of Japan, Vol.66, No.8, pp. 753-758, 1971 (in Japanese).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jul. 12, 2024