IJAT Vol.14 No.3 pp. 369-379
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2020.p0369


Impact of Model Complexity in the Monitoring of Machine Tools Condition Using Volumetric Errors

Kanglin Xing, J. R. R. Mayer, and Sofiane Achiche

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal
2500 Chemin de Polytechnique, Montréal, Québec H3T 1J4, Canada

Corresponding author

August 17, 2019
October 7, 2019
May 5, 2020
machine tool, condition monitoring, volumetric error, SAMBA method

The scale and master ball artefact (SAMBA) method allows estimating the inter- and intra-axis error parameters as well as volumetric errors (VEs) of a five-axis machine tool by using simple ball artefacts and the machine tool’s own touch-trigger probe. The SAMBA method can use two different machine error models named after the number of model parameters, i.e., the “13” and “84” machine error models, to estimate the VEs. In this study, we compare these two machine error models when using VE vector directions and values for monitoring the machine tool condition for three cases of machine malfunctions: 1) a C-axis encoder fault, 2) an induced X-axis linear positioning error, and 3) an induced straightness error simulated fault. The results show that the “13” machine error model produces more focused concentrated VE directions but smaller VE values when compared with the “84” machine error model; furthermore, although both models can recognize the three faults and are effective in monitoring the machine tool condition, the “13” machine error model achieves a better recognition rate of the machine condition. This paper provides guidelines for selecting machine error models for the SAMBA method when using VEs to monitor the machine tool condition.

Cite this article as:
K. Xing, J. Mayer, and S. Achiche, “Impact of Model Complexity in the Monitoring of Machine Tools Condition Using Volumetric Errors,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.14 No.3, pp. 369-379, 2020.
Data files:
  1. [1] R. Du, M. A. Elbestawi, and S. M. Wu, “Automated Monitoring of Manufacturing Processes, Part 1: Monitoring Methods,” ASME. J. Eng. Ind., Vol.117, No.2, pp. 121-132, 1995.
  2. [2] S. Achiche, M. Balazinski, L. Baron, and K. Jemielniak, “Tool wear monitoring using genetically-generated fuzzy knowledge bases,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol.15, Nos.3-4, pp. 303-314, 2002.
  3. [3] A. Gouarir, S. Kurokawa, T. Sajima, and M. Murata, “In-Process Tool Wear Detection of Uncoated Square End Mill Based on Electrical Contact Resistance,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.10, No.5, pp. 767-772, 2016.
  4. [4] R.-T. René de Jesús, H.-R. Gilberto, T.-V. Iván, and J.-C. Juan Carlos, “Driver current analysis for sensorless tool breakage monitoring of CNC milling machines,” Int. J. of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol.43, No.15, pp. 1529-1534, 2003.
  5. [5] Q. Ren, M. Balazinski, L. Baron, S. Achiche, and K. Jemielniak, “Experimental and fuzzy modelling analysis on dynamic cutting force in micro milling,” Soft Computing, Vol.17, No.9, pp. 1687-1697, 2013.
  6. [6] D. E. Dimla Sr. and P. M. Lister, “On-line metal cutting tool condition monitoring. I: force and vibration analyses,” Int. J. of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol.40, No.5, pp. 739-768, 2000.
  7. [7] R. Teti, K. Jemielniak, G. E. O’Donnell, and D. A. Dornfeld, “Advanced monitoring of machining operations,” CIRP Annals, Vol.59, No.2, pp. 717-739, 2010.
  8. [8] H. Sawano, R. Kobayashi, H. Yoshioka, and H. Shinno, “A Proposed Ultraprecision Machining Process Monitoring Method Using Causal Network Model of Air Spindle System,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.5, No.3, pp. 362-368, 2011.
  9. [9] D. Goyal and B. S. Pabla, “Development of non-contact structural health monitoring system for machine tools,” J. of Applied Research and Technology, Vol.14, No.4, pp. 245-258, 2016.
  10. [10] Y. Zhou, X. Mei, Y. Zhang, G. Jiang, and N. Sun, “Current-based feed axis condition monitoring and fault diagnosis,” Proc. of 2009 4th IEEE Conf. on Industrial Electronics and Applications, pp. 1191-1195, 2009.
  11. [11] G. W. Vogl, M. Calamari, S. Ye, and M. A. Donmez, “A Sensor-based Method for Diagnostics of Geometric Performance of Machine Tool Linear Axes,” Procedia Manufacturing, Vol.5, pp. 621-633, 2016.
  12. [12] K. Jemielniak, “Commercial tool condition monitoring systems,” Int. J. of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.15, No.10, pp. 711-721, 1999.
  13. [13] Y. Zhang and Q. Zhang, “Research and Discussion on the Electrical Fault of the CNC Machine,” Proc. of 2011 2nd Int. Conf. on Digital Manufacturing and Automation, pp. 305-308, 2011.
  14. [14] K. Xing, X. Rimpault, J. R. R. Mayer, J.-F. Chatelain, and S. Achiche, “Five-axis machine tool fault monitoring using volumetric errors fractal analysis,” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol.68, No.1, pp. 555-558, 2019.
  15. [15] J. R. R. Mayer, “Five-axis machine tool calibration by probing a scale enriched reconfigurable uncalibrated master balls artefact,” CIRP Annals, Vol.61, No.1, pp. 515-518, 2012.
  16. [16] M. McGill, “An Evaluation of Factors Affecting Document Ranking by Information Retrieval Systems,” School of Information Studies, Syracuse University, 1979.
  17. [17] N. A. Mchichi and J. R. R. Mayer, “Axis location errors and error motions calibration for a five-axis machine tool using the SAMBA method,” Proc. of 6th CIRP Int. Conf. on High Performance Cutting (HPC2014), Vol.14, pp. 305-310, 2014.
  18. [18] ISO 230-1:2012, “Test code for machine tools, Test code for machine tools, in Part 1: Geometric accuracy of machines operating under no-load or quasi-static conditions,” 2012.
  19. [19] K. Xing, S. Achiche, S. Esmaeili, and J. R. R. Mayer, “Comparison of Direct and Indirect Methods for Five-axis Machine Tools Geometric Error Measurement,” Procedia CIRP, Vol.78, pp. 231-236, 2018.
  20. [20] Y. Abbaszadeh-Mir, J. R. R. Mayer, G. Cloutier, and C. Fortin, “Theory and simulation for the identification of the link geometric errors for a five-axis machine tool using a telescoping magnetic ball-bar,” Int. J. of Production Research, Vol.40, No.18, pp. 4781-4797, 2002.
  21. [21] V. Gupta and G. S. Lehal, “A Survey of Text Mining Techniques and Applications,” J. of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 60-76, 2009.
  22. [22] J. Y. Liew, M. B. C. Khoo, and S. G. Neoh, “A study on the effects of a skewed distribution on the EWMA and MA charts,” Proc. of the 21st National Symp. on Mathematical Sciences, pp. 1034-1039, 2014.
  23. [23] P. K. Carson and A. B. Yeh, “Exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control charts for monitoring an analytical process,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol.46, No.4, pp. 707-724, 2004.
  24. [24] D. C. Montgomery, “Statistical Quality Control: A Modern Introduction (6th edition),” John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
  25. [25] K. Xing, S. Achiche, and J. R. R. Mayer, “Five-axis machine tools accuracy condition monitoring based on volumetric errors and vector similarity measures,” Int. J. of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol.138, pp. 80-93, 2019.
  26. [26] M. M. Rahman and J. R. R. Mayer, “Five axis machine tool volumetric error prediction through an indirect estimation of intra- and inter-axis error parameters by probing facets on a scale enriched uncalibrated indigenous artefact,” Precision Engineering, Vol.40, pp. 94-105, 2015.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jul. 23, 2024