single-au.php

IJAT Vol.13 No.3 pp. 330-337
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2019.p0330
(2019)

Paper:

Formation Mechanism of Pores Inside Structure Fabricated by Metal-Based Additive Manufacturing

Kyota Egashira*,†, Tatsuaki Furumoto**, Kiichi Hishida*, Satoshi Abe***, Tomohiro Koyano**, Yohei Hashimoto**, and Akira Hosokawa**

*Division of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University
Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-1192, Japan

Corresponding author

**Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan

***Panasonic Corporation Eco Solutions Company, Osaka, Japan

Received:
October 11, 2018
Accepted:
March 25, 2019
Published:
May 5, 2019
Keywords:
additive manufacturing, powder bed fusion, pore, temperature
Abstract

The powder bed fusion (PBF) technique is a metal-based additive manufacturing (AM) method in which metal powder is deposited on a substrate and melted by selective laser-beam irradiation. Given that the process and parameters of metal-based AM are complicated, there are various problems in high-precision fabrication. One of these is that although metal-based AM can be used for fabrication of high-density parts, pores can easily form inside the fabricated structure owing to process instabilities. Pore formation degrades the mechanical strength of the fabricated structure. Therefore, this study investigated the pore formation mechanism inside a structure fabricated by PBF. Pore suppression by controlling the substrate temperature was also evaluated. Small- and large-sized pores with diameters of 10 μm and more than 50 μm, respectively, were found. Furthermore, differences in pore formation in the cross-section of the fabricated structure were observed owing to a variation in the volume-specific energy density and substrate temperature. At a substrate temperature of 25°C, the number of pores decreased more at the upper position than at the lower position owing to repeated melting and solidification under the laser-beam irradiation. At a substrate temperature of 200°C, the number of pores decreased significantly more than at 25°C. Furthermore, as the substrate temperature increased, the wettability of the molten metal improved, resulting in smaller contact angles of the fabricated structure in the single-line track. In PBF, multiple lines are fabricated in each layer. At low substrate temperatures, interstices were formed between the lines owing to the low wettability of the molten metal. These interstices acted as the origins of pores when the next layer was fabricated. Heating the substrate made the surface of the structure smooth owing to the high wettability of the molten metal and a reduction in the number of pores. Therefore, the formation of large pores could be reduced by controlling the substrate temperature.

Cite this article as:
K. Egashira, T. Furumoto, K. Hishida, S. Abe, T. Koyano, Y. Hashimoto, and A. Hosokawa, “Formation Mechanism of Pores Inside Structure Fabricated by Metal-Based Additive Manufacturing,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.13, No.3, pp. 330-337, 2019.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] H. Kodama, “Automatic method for fabricating a three-dimensional plastic model with photo-hardening polymer,” Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol.52, Issue 11, pp. 1770-1773, 1981.
  2. [2] C. W. Hull, “Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography,” U.S. Patent No.4,575,330, 1986.
  3. [3] H. Kyogoku, “Research Trend and Application of Additive Manufacturing,” J. of Smart Processing, Vol.3, No.3, pp. 148-151, 2014 (in Japanese).
  4. [4] ASTM, ASTM F2792-10e1, “Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies,” Annual Book of ASTM Standard, pp. 671-673, 2012.
  5. [5] J. M. Flynn, A. Shokrani, S. T. Newman, and V. Dhokia, “Hybrid additive and subtractive machine tools, Research and industrial developments,” Int. J. of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol.101, pp. 79-101, 2016.
  6. [6] D. Bourell, J.-P. Kruth, M. Leu, G. Lavy, D. Rosen, A. M. Beese, and A. Clare, “Materials for Additive Manufacturing,” CIRP Annals, Vol.66, Issue 2, pp. 659-681, 2017.
  7. [7] M. K. Thompson et al., “Design for additive manufacturing: Trends, opportunities, considerations, and constraints,” CIRP Annals, Vol.65, Issue 2, pp. 737-760, 2016.
  8. [8] S. Hälgren, L. Pejryd, and J. Ekengren, “(Re)Design for Additive Manufacturing,” Procedia CIRP, Vol.50, pp. 246-251, 2016.
  9. [9] H. Ikeda and T. Masuoka, “Application of metal additive manufacturing technology for space vehicle,” J. of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, Vol.82, No.7, pp. 639-642, 2016 (in Japanese).
  10. [10] Y. Liu, Y. Yang, S. Mai, D. Wang, and C. Song, “Investigation into spatter behavior during selective laser melting of AISI 316L stainless steel powder,” Materials and Design, Vol.87, pp. 797-806, 2015.
  11. [11] B. Vrancken, L. Thijs, J.-P Kruth, and J. V. Humbeeck, “Heat treatment of Ti6Al4V produced by selective laser melting: Microstructure and mechanical properties,” J. of Alloys and Compounds, Vol.541, pp. 177-185, 2012.
  12. [12] J.-P. Kruth, G. Levy, F. Klocke, and T. H. C. Childs, “Consolidation phenomena in laser and powder-bed based layered manufacturing,” CIRP Annals, Vol.56, Issue 2, pp. 730-759, 2007.
  13. [13] K. Kempen, E. Yasa, L. Thijs, J.-P. Kruth, and J. V. Humbeeck, “Microstructure and mechanical properties of Selective Laser Melted 18Ni-300 steel,” Physics Procedia, Vol.12, Part A, pp. 255-263, 2011.
  14. [14] R. Cunningham, S. P. Narra, C. Montgomery, J. Beuth, and A. D. Rollett, “Synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography characterization of the effect of processing variables on porosity formation in laser powder-bed additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V,” The J. of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Vol.69, Issue 3, pp. 479-484, 2017.
  15. [15] S. A. Khairallah, A. T. Anderson, A. Rubenchik, and W. E. King, “Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: Physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones,” Acta Materialia, Vol.108, pp. 36-45, 2016.
  16. [16] H. Gong, K. Rafi, N. V. Karthik, T. Starr, and B. Stucker, “Defect morphology in Ti-6Al-4V parts fabricated by selective laser melting and electron beam melting,” 24th Annual Int. Solid Freeform Fabrication, pp. 440-453, 2013.
  17. [17] C. Schaak, W. Tillmann, M. Schaper, and M. E. Aydinöz, “Process Gas Infiltration in Inconel 718 Samples during SLM Processing,” RTeJournal – Fachforum für Rapid Technologie, Vol.13, Issue 1, 2016.
  18. [18] T. Furumoto, K. Egashira, K. Munekage, and S. Abe, “Experimental investigation of melt pool behaviour during selective laser melting by high speed imaging,” CIRP Annals, Vol.67, Issue 1, pp. 253-256, 2018.
  19. [19] T. Furumoto, T. Ueda, A. Hosokawa, S. Abe, and T. H. C. Childs, “Study on the measurement of physical properties in the metal powder for rapid prototyping, proposal of the measurement of thermal conductivity,” J. of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, Vol.73, Issue 5, pp. 558-562, 2007.
  20. [20] T. Furumoto, T. Ueda, N. Kobayashi, A. Yassin, A. Hosokawa, and S. Abe, “Study on laser consolidation of metal powder with Yb:fiber laser, Evaluation of line consolidation structure,” J. of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.209, Issues 18-19, pp. 5973-5980, 2009.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Jul. 16, 2019