IJAT Vol.13 No.1 pp. 67-73
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2019.p0067


A Neural Network Based Process Planning System to Infer Tool Path Pattern for Complicated Surface Machining

Mayu Hashimoto and Keiichi Nakamoto

Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology
2-24-16 Naka-cho, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8588, Japan

Corresponding author

May 29, 2018
October 9, 2018
January 5, 2019
process planning, neural network, complicated surface, die and mold, machining knowhow

Die and mold are necessary for the manufacture of present industrial products. In recent years, the requirement of high quality and low cost machining of complicated surfaces has increased. However, it is difficult to generalize process planning that depends on skillful experts and decreases the efficiency of preparation in die and mold machining. To overcome an issue that is difficult to generalize, it is well known that neural networks may have the ability to infer a valid value based on past case data. Therefore, this study aims at developing a neural network based process planning system to infer the required process parameters for complicated surface machining by using past machining information. The result of the conducted case studies demonstrates that the developed process planning system is helpful for determining the tool path pattern for complicated surface machining according to the implicit machining knowhow.

Cite this article as:
M. Hashimoto and K. Nakamoto, “A Neural Network Based Process Planning System to Infer Tool Path Pattern for Complicated Surface Machining,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.13, No.1, pp. 67-73, 2019.
Data files:
  1. [1] M. M. Isnaini and K. Shirase, “Review of computer-aided process planning systems for machining operation – future development of a computer-aided process planning system –,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.5, No.5, pp. 317-332, 2014.
  2. [2] E. Morinaga, M. Yamada, H. Wakamatsu, and E. Arai, “Flexible process planning method for milling,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.5, No.5, pp. 700-707, 2011.
  3. [3] S. Igari, F. Tanaka, and M. Onosato, “Computer-aided operation planning for an actual machine tool based on updatable machining database and database-oriented planning algorithm,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.6, No.6, pp. 717-723, 2012.
  4. [4] E. Morinaga, T. Hara, H. Joko, H. Wakamatsu, and E. Arai, “Improvement of computational efficiency in flexible computer-aided process planning,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.8, No.3, pp. 396-405, 2014.
  5. [5] K. Shirase and K. Nakamoto, “Simulation technologies for the development of an autonomous and intelligent machine tool,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.7, No.1, pp. 6-15, 2013.
  6. [6] M. M. Isnaini, Y. Shinoki, R. Sato, and K. Shirase, “Development of a CAD-CAM interaction system to generate a flexible machining process plan,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.9, No.2, pp. 104-114, 2015.
  7. [7] H. Sakurai and P. Dave, “Volume Decomposition and Feature Recognition: Part 1 – Polyhedral Objects,” Computer-Aided Design, Vol.27, No.11, pp. 793-869, 1995.
  8. [8] J. H. Han, M. Platt, and W. C. Regli, “Manufacturing feature recognition from solid models: A status report,” IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, Vol.8, No.3, pp. 782-796, 2000.
  9. [9] Y. S. Kim and E. Wang, “Recognition of machining features for cast then machined parts,” Computer-Aided Design, Vol.34, No.1, pp. 71-87, 2002.
  10. [10] B. T. Sheen and C. F. You, “Manufacturing feature recognition and tool-path generation for 3-axis CNC milling,” Computer-Aided Design, Vol.38, pp. 553-562, 2006.
  11. [11] Y. Woo, E. Wang, Y. S. Kim, and H. M. Rho, “A hybrid feature recognizer for machining process planning systems,” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Vol.54, No.1, pp. 397-400, 2006.
  12. [12] J. Zhu, M. Kato, T. Tanaka, H. Yoshioka, and Y. Saito, “Graph based automatic process planning system for multi-tasking machine,” J. of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing, Vol.9, No.3, Paper No.15-00296, 2015.
  13. [13] G. C. Onwubolu, “Manufacturing features recognition using backpropagation neural networks,” J. of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol.10, Nos.3-4, pp. 289-299, 1999.
  14. [14] N. Ozturk and F. Ozturk, “Neural network based non-standard feature recognition to integrate CAD and CAM,” Computers in Industry, Vol.45, pp. 123-135, 2001.
  15. [15] C. H. Dagli, P. Poshyanonda, and A. Bahrami, “Neuro computing and concurrent engineering,” H. R. Parsei and W. G. Sullivan (Eds.), “Concurrent Engineering,” Springer, pp. 465-486, 1993.
  16. [16] W. S. McCulloch and W. Pitts, “A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, Vol.5, pp. 115-133, 1943.
  17. [17] W. S. McCulloch, “Embodiments of Mind,” MIT Press, pp.19-39, 1965.
  18. [18] E. O. Ezugwu, S. J. Arthur, and E. L. Hines, “Tool-wear prediction using artificial neural networks,” J. of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.49, Nos.3-4, pp. 255-265, 1996.
  19. [19] F. Rosenblatt, “The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain,” Psychological Review, Vol.65, pp. 386-407, 1958 (Reprinted in Neurocomputing, MIT Press, 1988).
  20. [20] A. K. Jain, J. Mao, and K. M. Mohiuddin, “Artificial neural networks: a tutorial,” Computer, Vol.29, No.3, pp. 31-44, 1996.
  21. [21] D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” Int. Conf. for Learning Representations, pp. 1-15, 2015.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Jan. 19, 2019