Paper:
Tool Path Generation for Five-Axis Controlled Machining with Consideration of Structural Interference
Tomoyuki Kanda and Koichi Morishige
Faculty of Informatics and Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Systems, The University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu-shi, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan
In the case of five-axis controlled machining, the machine components such as tables, spindles, and columns take various locations, so interference may occur among machine components. In commercial CAM software used five-axis controlled machining, however, structural interference is not considered. Output Cutter Location (CL) data may therefore cause structural interference. In this report, locations of the machine components where structural interference may occur are calculated and a tool path generation method considering the above-mentioned problem of interference is developed. The effectiveness of the devised technique was confirmed experimentally as a result of machining simulation.
- [1] Y.-S. Lee and T.-C. Chang, “2-Phase approach to global tool interference avoidance in 5-axis machining,” Computer-Aided Design, Vol.27, No.10, pp. 715-729, 1995.
- [2] T. Chen, P. Ye, and J. Wang, “Local interference detection and avoidance in five-axis NC machining of sculptured surfaces,” Springer-Verlag, London, Vol.25, Nos.3-4, pp. 343-349, 2005.
- [3] C.-F. You and C.-H. Chu, “Tool-Path Verification in Five-Axis Machining of Sculptured Surfaces,” Springer-Verlag, London, Vol.13, No.4, pp. 248-255, 1997.
- [4] C.-H. Chu and J.-T. Chen, “Tool Path Planning for Five-Axis Flank Milling with Developable Surface Approximation,” Springer-Verlag, London, Vol.29, Nos.7-8, pp. 707-713, 2006.
- [5] W. Zhang, Y. F. Zhang, Q. J. Ge, “Interference-free tool path generation for 5-axis sculptured surface machining using rational Bezier motions of a flat-end cutter,” Int. J. of Production Research, Vol.43, No.19, pp. 4103-4124, 2005.
- [6] C.-C. Lo, “Real-time generation and control of cutter path for 5-axis CNC machining,” Int. J. of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol.39, pp. 471-488, 1999.
- [7] Y.-L. Cai, G. X, “Global tool interference detection in five-axis machining of sculptured surface,” Proc. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B, J. of Engineering Manufacture, Vol.216, p. 1345, 2002.
- [8] J. P. Kruth, B. Lauwers, P. Klewais, and P. Dejongh, “NCpostprocessing and NC-simulation for five-axis milling operations with automatic collision avoidance,” J. for Manufacturing Science and Production. Vol.2, Issue 4, pp. 207-216, 1999.
- [9] Y. Takeuchi, K.Wada, T. Hisaki, andM. Yokoyama, “Study on postprocessor for 5-axis control machining centers – in case of spindletilting type and table/spindle-tilting type,” Proc. of The Japan Society for Precision Engineering, Vol.60, No.1, p. 75, 1994.
- [10] Y. Fujino, K. Morishige, “Tool Path Generation for Five-Axis Controlled Machining with Consideration of Movable Range of Machine Tool and Tool Attitude Change,” Proc. of The Japan Society for Precision Engineering, Vol.74, No.12, p. 1330, 2008.
- [11] K. Morishige, K. Kase, and Y. Takeuchi, “Collision-Free Tool Path Generation Using 2-Dimensional C-Space for 5-Axis Control Machining,” The Int J. of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Springer-Verlag, London, Vol.13, No.6, pp. 393-400, 1997.
- [12] D. E. Knuth, “The Art of Computer Programming,” Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, Vol.3, Sorting and Searching, 1973.
- [13] D. T. Lee, C. K. Wong, “Worst-Case Analysis for Region and Partial region Searches in Multidimensional Binary Search Trees and Balanced Quad Trees,” Acta Infomatica, Vol.9, No.1, pp. 23-29, 1977.
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.