This paper provides an outline of the robotics class offered in the Product Design Course at the School of Design, Sapporo City University, Japan. Recently, advances in mechatronics components have led to the development of various types of robots, including home and entertainment robots, in addition to factory robots. For these robots, appearance design and expression function through movement or interaction are more critical than control ability in accomplishing the assigned tasks. This means that a robot designer should approach both design and functions. The author offered the robotics class in the first semester of the 4th-year Product Design Course at the School of Design, Sapporo City University, Japan. Students in this class were required to develop an actual entertainment robot via group work with three or four members. A development theme was given before the work assignment, and the design concept was required to align with this theme. During group work, all members were required to integrate their individual skills into the robot. The group work began with idea development for the robot design, involving contributions from all members. The design concept of each robot was considered based on the idea sketches, brainstorming, and investigations via the internet and library books. Thereafter, the robot appearance design as well as motion and interactive function were decided. Students designed the robot’s appearance using various design tools and motion with interactive systems using mechatronics components learned in the previous year’s “Mechatronics” class. The outline of the curriculum and the “Robotics” class was first explained, followed by an overview of the robot development tools and related classes. Finally, some selected achievements were presented, and the class was evaluated based on the results of a class evaluation rubric.

1. [1] M. Ami, “Educational effects of robot contests,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.10, No.1, pp. 52-55, 1998. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.1998.p0051
2. [2] A. Mitani, Y. Suzuki, and Y. Tochigi, “Development of trident motif riden mobile robot for robot-triathlon robot contest,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.29, No.1, pp. 269-272, 2017. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2017.p0269
3. [3] S. Muramatsu, D. Chugo, S. Yokota, and H. Hashimoto, “Student education utilizing the development of autonomous mobile robot for robot competition,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.29, No.6, pp. 1025-1036, 2017. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2017.p1025
4. [4] Y. Kaji, J. Kawata, and S. Fujisawa, “Educational effect of participation in robot competition on experience-based learning,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.31, No.3, pp. 383-390, 2019. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2019.p0383
5. [5] G. Endo, T. Aoki, H. Suzuki, E. F. Fukushima, and S. Hirose, “Street performance robot contest as practice in creativity education,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.23, No.5, pp. 768-777, 2011. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2011.p0768
6. [6] H. Yamagata and T. Morita, “Design of contest for educational underwater robot for STEM: Learning applying modeling based on control engineering,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.29, No.6, pp. 957-968, 2017. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2017.p0957
7. [7] M. Tekerek, “A human robot interaction application for robotic education,” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 2164-2169, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.380
8. [8] F. Jimenez and M. Kanoh, “Support system for teachers in communication with educational support robot,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.24, No.3, pp. 377-385, 2020. https://doi.org/10.20965/jaciii.2020.p0377
9. [9] T. Morishita, “Creating attraction for technical education material and its educational benefit (Development of robotic education material characterized by 3D CAD/CAM and compact stereo vision),” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.23, No.5, pp. 665-675, 2011. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2011.p0665
10. [10] M. Tiboni, F. Aggogeri, R. Bussola, A. Borboni, C. A. Perani, and N. Pellegrini, “Low-cost design solutions for educational robots,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.30, No.5, pp. 827-834, 2018. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2018.p0827
11. [11] T. Imamura et al., “Educational project for robotics and mechatronics using tele-control system between national college of technology and Toyohashi University of Technology,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.21, No.3, pp. 384-393, 2009. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2009.p0384
12. [12] K. Matsushita, H. Yokoi, and T. Arai, “Plastic-bottle-based robots in educational robotics courses – Understanding embodied artificial intelligence –,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.19, No.2, pp. 212-222, 2007. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2007.p0212
13. [13] Y. Takahashi, M. Takagi, and I. Yoneda, “Design education using personal mobile robot,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.23, No.5, pp. 739-747, 2011. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2011.p0739