This study examines the educational effects of a generative AI music creation workshop conducted as part of STEAM education that integrates the arts (in this case, music creation) into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The workshop, held at Osaka Metropolitan University College of Technology, employed state-of-the-art generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Suno, a music generation AI. It provided students with the opportunity to write their lyrics and collaborate with AI to compose music. Additionally, AI literacy education was incorporated to deepen understanding of the risks and ethical challenges associated with AI, aiming to balance creative activities with the responsible use of technology. Results from a post-workshop survey indicated that students experienced heightened creativity and self-expression through collaboration with generative AI, and many reported feeling a sense of excitement and anticipation (“wakuwaku”) during the process. Notably, creating music with AI was found to enhance students’ creative self-efficacy and promote sustained motivation for long-term AI use. However, some participants also expressed concerns about over-reliance on AI and reported psychological barriers, highlighting areas for improvement in future implementations. This study not only demonstrates that STEAM education incorporating generative AI is an effective approach to fostering students’ creativity and motivation to learn, but also addresses practical challenges such as ethical considerations and the need for supportive educational environments. Furthermore, as a successful case supported by The Asia Foundation and Microsoft, the program suggests the potential for collaboration among industry, academia, and government in advancing STEAM education.

1. [1] S. Nakajima, “STEAM Education from Zero Knowledge,” Gentosha, 2022 (in Japanese).
2. [2] K. Kawada, K. Okamoto, T. Tamai, and Y. Ohnishi, “A Study on Developmentally Appropriate Programming Education Learning Materials for Lower-Elementary School Students,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.31, No.3, pp. 441-451, 2019. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2019.p0441
3. [3] T. Shimoto, C. Miyamoto, and T. Umeno, “Development of the Biological Information Measurement System for STEM Education and High School/University Articulation,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.31, No.4, pp. 594-602, 2019. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2019.p0594
4. [4] K. Nakatani, T. Doi, T. Wada, and T. Kaneda, “Promotion of Self-Growth of Students by PBL-Type Manufacturing Practice,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.29, No.6, pp. 1037-1048, 2017. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2017.p1037
5. [5] L. Cheng, “The impact of generative AI on school music education: Challenges and recommendations,” Arts Education Policy Review, Vol.35, No.1, pp. 1-8, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2025.2451373
6. [6] P. E. Riley, “Exploration of student development through songwriting,” Visions of Research in Music Education, Vol.22, Article No.6, 2012.
7. [7] D. Aguilera and J. Ortiz-Revilla, “STEM vs. STEAM education and student creativity: A systematic literature review,” Education Sciences, Vol.11, No.7, Article No.331, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331
8. [8] M. Csikszentmihalyi, “Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience,” H. Imamura and M. Sasaki (Trans.), Sekaishisosha, 1996 (in Japanese).
9. [9] J. F. Merchán Sánchez-Jara, S. González Gutiérrez, J. Cruz Rodríguez, and B. Syroyid, “Artificial intelligence-assisted music education: A critical synthesis of challenges and opportunities,” Education Sciences, Vol.14, No.11, Article No.1171, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111171
10. [10] H. de Vries, “Space for STEAM: New creativity challenge in education,” Frontiers in Psychology, Vol.12, Article No.586318. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.586318