How does public cognition (e.g., awareness, attention, memory) of a disaster event change over time and become distributed across geographical space after the event occurs? This question addresses the spatio-temporal characteristics of collective disaster event cognition (CDEC). This study focuses on the Great East Japan Earthquake, a catastrophic disaster that struck the coastal region of Japan’s Tohoku area on March 11, 2011, resulting in over 20,000 people dead or missing. Using long-term data from the Google Trends service (supplemented by long-term Wikipedia pageview data), the study investigates the spatio-temporal dynamics of CDEC. Key temporal findings include a seasonal effect, in which Google Trends scores increased during the annual month of remembrance, and a milestone effect, where scores rose relatively higher during major anniversary years, such as the fifth and tenth anniversaries. Additionally, an association effect was observed. For example, attention increased in response to other major earthquakes, such as the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake and the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake. In the spatial dimension, analyzing the relationship between Google Trends scores and distance from the affected areas revealed a distance decay effect. This effect was more accurately captured by nonlinear models than by linear ones. Finally, this study discusses the theoretical and social implications of these findings and offers perspectives for elucidating the phenomenon of CDEC and informing future disaster risk reduction efforts.

1. [1] University of Cambridge, “Darwin Correspondence Project.” https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/ [Accessed July 31, 2025]
2. [2] T. Terada, “Natural disasters and national defense,” Aozora Bunko, 1934. https://www.aozora.gr.jp/cards/000042/files/2509_9319.html [Accessed July 27, 2025]
3. [3] R. Saito, M. Yasuda, T. Muramoto, and T. Oda, “The possibility of geographic area and time distribution of DRR education to represent disaster collective memory: A time geographic study of newspapers in Japan,” Inclusive and Integrated Disaster Reduction, pp. 472-480, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81072-5_34
4. [4] R. Saito, T. Muramoto, and T. Oda, “Differences of educational practices for disaster risk reduction in elementary and junior high school in coastal areas in three prefectures affected by the Great East Earthquake: A comparison study in prefectures and in types of school,” Research J. of Disaster Education, Vol.3, No.2, pp. 1-23, 2023 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.51004/rjde.3.2_1
5. [5] N. Dasandi, S. Jankin, D. K. Pantera, and M. Romanello, “Public engagement with health and climate change around the world: A Google Trends analysis,” The Lancet Planetary Health, Vol.9, No.3, pp. e236-e244, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00029-4
6. [6] S. P. Jun, H. S. Yoo, and S. Choi, “Ten years of research change using Google Trends: From the perspective of big data utilizations and applications,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.130, pp. 69-87, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.009
7. [7] A. Mavragani, G. Ochoa, and K. P. Tsagarakis, “Assessing the methods, tools, and statistical approaches in Google Trends research: Systematic review,” J. of Medical Internet Research, Vol.20, No.11, Article No.e270, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9366
8. [8] Google, “FAQ about Google Trends data.” https://support.google.com/trends/answer/4365533?hl=en [Accessed May 24, 2025]
9. [9] S. V. Nuti, B. Wayda, I. Ranasinghe, S. Wang, R. P. Dreyer, S. I. Chen, and K. Murugiah, “The use of Google Trends in health care research: A systematic review,” PLOS ONE, Vol.9, No.10, Article No.e109583, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109583
10. [10] V. S. Arora, M. McKee, and D. Stuckler, “Google Trends: Opportunities and limitations in health and health policy research,” Health Policy, Vol.123, Issue 3, pp. 338-341, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.01.001
11. [11] H. A. Carneiro and E. Mylonakis, “Google Trends: A web-based tool for real-time surveillance of disease outbreaks,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, Vol.49, Issue 10, pp. 1557-1564, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1086/630200
12. [12] H. Choi and H. Varian, “Predicting the present with Google Trends,” Economic Record, Vol.88, Issue s1, pp. 2-9, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2012.00809.x
13. [13] D. Borup and E. C. M. Schütte, “In search of a job: Forecasting employment growth using Google Trends,” J. of Business & Economic Statistics, Vol.40, Issue 1, pp. 186-200, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2020.1791133
14. [14] E. Castelnuovo and T. D. Tran, “Google it up! A Google Trends-based uncertainty index for the United States and Australia,” Economics Letters, Vol.161, pp. 149-153, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.09.032
15. [15] E. Cebrián and J. Domenech, “Is Google Trends a quality data source?,” Applied Economics Letters, Vol.30, Issue 6, pp. 811-815, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.2023088
16. [16] G. Cervellin, I. Comelli, and G. Lippi, “Is Google Trends a reliable tool for digital epidemiology? Insights from different clinical settings,” J. of Epidemiology and Global Health, Vol.7, No.3, pp. 185-189, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2017.06.001
17. [17] I. Lolić, M. Matošec, and P. Sorić, “DIY Google Trends indicators in social sciences: A methodological note,” Technology in Society, Vol.77, Article No.102477, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102477
18. [18] J. Hölzl, F. Keusch, and C. Sajons, “The (mis)use of Google Trends data in the social sciences—A systematic review, critique, and recommendations,” Social Science Research, Vol.126, Article No.103099, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103099
19. [19] E. J. Masicampo and N. Ambady, “Predicting fluctuations in widespread interest: Memory decay and goal-related memory accessibility in Internet search trends,” J. of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol.143, No.1, pp. 205-214, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030731
20. [20] N. Rouhani, D. Stanley, COVID-Dynamic Team, and R. Adolphs, “Collective events and individual affect shape autobiographical memory,” Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol.120, No.29, Article No.e2221919120, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2221919120
21. [21] S. Merrill and S. Lindgren, “The rhythms of social movement memories: The mobilization of Silvio Meier’s activist remembrance across platforms,” Social Movement Studies, Vol.19, Issues 5-6, pp. 657-674, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1534680
22. [22] J. Kam, K. Stowers, and S. Kim, “Monitoring of drought awareness from Google Trends: A case study of the 2011–17 California drought,” Weather, Climate, and Society, Vol.11, Issue 2, pp. 419-429, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0085.1
23. [23] S. P. Shariatpanahi, A. Jafari, M. Sadeghipour, N. Azadeh-Fard, K. Majidzadeh-A, L. Farahmand, and A. M. Ansari, “Assessing the effectiveness of disease awareness programs: Evidence from Google Trends data for the world awareness dates,” Telematics and Informatics, Vol.34, Issue 7, pp. 904-913, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.03.007
24. [24] M. Kaatz, S. Springer, R. Schubert, and M. Zieger, “Representation of long COVID syndrome in the awareness of the population is revealed by Google Trends analysis,” Brain, Behavior, & Immunity-Health, Vol.22, Article No.100455, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbih.2022.100455
25. [25] Z. D. U. Durmuşoğlu, “Using Google Trends data to assess public understanding on the environmental risks,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An Int. J., Vol.23, Issue 8, pp. 1968-1977, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2017.1350566
26. [26] W. Hirst, J. K. Yamashiro, and A. Coman, “Collective memory from a psychological perspective,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol.22, Issue 5, pp. 438-451, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.010
27. [27] J. V. Wertsch and H. L. Roediger III, “Collective memory: Conceptual foundations and theoretical approaches,” Memory, Vol.16, Issue 3, pp. 318-326, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701801434
28. [28] P. Lorenz-Spreen, B. M. Mønsted, P. Hövel, and S. Lehmann, “Accelerating dynamics of collective attention,” Nature Communications, Vol.10, No.1, Article No.1759, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09311-w
29. [29] F. Wu and B. A. Huberman, “Novelty and collective attention,” Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol.104, No.45, pp. 17599-17601, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704916104
30. [30] H. C. Lee, S. M. Broniarczyk, and J. Zheng, “Mapping collective consciousness to consumer research: In-person to virtual social presence,” J. of Consumer Psychology, Vol.34, Issue 4, pp. 694-704, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1435
31. [31] G. Shteynberg, “The psychology of collective consciousness,” J. of Consumer Psychology, Vol.34, Issue 4, pp. 678-686, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1434
32. [32] M. Mooijman, J. Hoover, Y. Lin, H. Ji, and M. Dehghani, “Moralization in social networks and the emergence of violence during protests,” Nature Human Behaviour, Vol.2, No.6, pp. 389-396, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0353-0
33. [33] K. Sasahara, W. Chen, H. Peng, G. L. Ciampaglia, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer, “Social influence and unfollowing accelerate the emergence of echo chambers,” J. of Computational Social Science, Vol.4, No.1, pp. 381-402, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00084-7
34. [34] D. Erokhin and N. Komendantova, “Analyzing public interest in geohazards using Google Trends data,” Geosciences, Vol.14, Issue 10, Article No.266, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14100266
35. [35] F. T. Gizzi, J. Kam, and D. Porrini, “Time windows of opportunities to fight earthquake under-insurance: Evidence from Google Trends,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Vol.7, No.1, Article No.61, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0532-2
36. [36] C. Houser, B. Vlodarchyk, and P. Wernette, “Short communication: Public interest in rip currents relative to other natural hazards: Evidence from Google search data,” Natural Hazards, Vol.97, pp. 1395-1405, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03696-z
37. [37] J. Yeo and C. C. Knox, “Public attention to a local disaster versus competing focusing events: Google Trends analysis following the 2016 Louisiana flood,” Social Science Quarterly, Vol.100, Issue 7, pp. 2542-2554, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12666
38. [38] A. Silver and S. Jackson, “Public attention during Hurricanes Florence and Michael,” Weather, Climate, and Society, Vol.15, Issue 2, pp. 425-435, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-22-0090.1
39. [39] D. M. Ahmad and J. Kam, “Disparity between global drought hazard and awareness,” npj Clean Water, Vol.7, No.1, Article No.75, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-024-00373-y
40. [40] S. M. B. Shahabi-Haghighi and H. Hamidifar, “Exploring the link between drought-related terms and public interests: Global insights from LSTM-based predictions and Google Trends analysis,” Hydrological Processes, Vol.37, Issue 11, Article No.e15016, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15016
41. [41] J. J. Thompson, R. L. Wilby, T. Matthews, and C. Murphy, “The utility of Google Trends as a tool for evaluating flooding in data-scarce places,” Area, Vol.54, Issue 2, pp. 203-212, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12719
42. [42] Reconstruction Agency, “Recovery status and efforts since the Great East Japan Earthquake” (in Japanese). https://www.reconstruction.go.jp/topics/main-cat1/sub-cat1-1/20131029113414.html [Accessed May 24, 2025]
43. [43] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, “Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030,” 2015. https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030 [Accessed May 24, 2025]
44. [44] S. Dehaene, “The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner law: A logarithmic mental number line,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol.7, Issue 4, pp. 145-147, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00055-x
45. [45] C. Donkin and R. M. Nosofsky, “A power-law model of psychological memory strength in short- and long-term recognition,” Psychological Science, Vol.23, Issue 6, pp. 625-634, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430961
46. [46] J. Gibbon and R. M. Church, “Time left: Linear versus logarithmic subjective time,” J. of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, Vol.7, No.2, pp. 87-108, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.7.2.87
47. [47] C. T. Kello, G. D. A. Brown, R. Ferrer-i-Cancho, J. G. Holden, K. Linkenkaer-Hansen, T. Rhodes, and G. C. V. Orden, “Scaling laws in cognitive sciences,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol.14, Issue 5, pp. 223-232, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.02.005
48. [48] D. C. Rubin and A. E. Wenzel, “One hundred years of forgetting: A quantitative description of retention,” Psychological Review, Vol.103, No.4, pp. 734-760, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.734
49. [49] S. S. Stevens, “On the psychophysical law,” Psychological Review, Vol.64, No.3, pp. 153-181, 1957. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046162
50. [50] S. S. Stevens, “A scale for the measurement of a psychological magnitude: Loudness,” Psychological Review, Vol.43, No.5, pp. 405-416, 1936. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058773
51. [51] J. T. Wixted and E. B. Ebbesen, “On the form of forgetting,” Psychological Science, Vol.2, No.6, pp. 409-415, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00175.x
52. [52] A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, and M. E. Newman, “Power-law distributions in empirical data,” SIAM Review, Vol.51, Issue 4, pp. 661-703, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1137/070710111
53. [53] X. Gabaix, “Power laws in economics and finance,” Annual Review of Economics, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 255-294, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.142940
54. [54] J. Laherrere and D. Sornette, “Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: ‘Fat tails’ with characteristic scales,” The European Physical J. B – Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Vol.2, No.4, pp. 525-539, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100510050276
55. [55] Wikipedia, “Wikipedia: Pageview statistics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Pageview_statistics [Accessed July 27, 2025]
56. [56] Wikipedia, “Pageviews analysis” (in Japanese). https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=ja.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2015-07&end=2025-05&pages=東日本大震災 [Accessed July 27, 2025]
57. [57] Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, “The disaster caused by the earthquake off the coast of Fukushima Prefecture in 2021,” White Paper on Disaster Management 2021, 2021.
58. [58] NHK, “Kumamoto Earthquake: One additional disaster-related death confirmed in Kumamoto Prefecture, bringing the total death toll to 278,” April 11, 2025 (in Japanese). https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20250411/k10014776751000.html [Accessed May 24, 2025]
59. [59] NHK, “Noto Peninsula Earthquake: Nine additional disaster-related deaths confirmed, bringing the total death toll to 616,” June 20, 2025 (in Japanese). https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20250620/k10014840121000.html [Accessed May 24, 2025]
60. [60] Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, “Northern Osaka Earthquake,” White Paper on Disaster Management 2019, 2019.
61. [61] J. R. Finley, “Expanded taxonomies of human memory,” Frontiers in Cognition, Vol.3, Article No.1505549, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcogn.2024.1505549
62. [62] I. Momennejad, “Collective minds: Social network topology shapes collective cognition,” Philosophical Trans. of the Royal Society B, Vol.377, Issue 1843, Article No.20200315, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0315
63. [63] J.-F. Orianne and F. Eustache, “Collective memory: between individual systems of consciousness and social systems,” Frontiers in Psychology, Vol.14, Article No.1238272, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1238272
64. [64] J.-F. Orianne, D. Peschanski, J. Müller, B. Guillery, and F. Eustache, “The process of memory semantization as the result of interactions between individual, collective, and social memories,” Cortex, Vol.183, pp. 1-14, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2024.11.001
65. [65] F. Seeme, D. Green, and C. Kopp, “Ignorance of the crowd: Dysfunctional thinking in social networks,” Frontiers in Communication, Vol.10, Article No.1547489, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1547489
66. [66] M. Halbwachs, “La mémoire collective,” T. Koseki (Trans.), Kōrōsha, 1989.
67. [67] T. Muramoto and R. Saito, “Disaster and the human mind,” T. Oda (Ed.), “Disaster Risk Reduction Workbook for Educators,” pp. 37-45, Asakura Publishing, 2021 (in Japanese).
68. [68] H. L. Roediger III and K. A. DeSoto, “Forgetting the presidents,” Science, Vol.346, No.6213, pp. 1106-1109, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259627
69. [69] H. L. Roediger III and K. A. DeSoto, “Recognizing the presidents: Was Alexander Hamilton president?,” Psychological Science, Vol.27, No.5, pp. 644-650, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616631113
70. [70] R. Brown and J. Kulik, “Flashbulb memories,” Cognition, Vol.5, Issue 1, pp. 73-99, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(77)90018-X
71. [71] A. R. A. Conway, L. J. Skitka, J. A. Hemmerich, and T. C. Kershaw, “Flashbulb memory for 11 September 2001,” Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol.23, Issue 5, pp. 605-623, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1497
72. [72] M. A. Conway and C. W. Pleydell-Pearce, “The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system,” Psychological Review, Vol.107, No.2, pp. 261-288, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.261
73. [73] A. Wilson and M. Ross, “The identity function of autobiographical memory: Time is on our side,” Memory, Vol.11, Issue 2, pp. 137-149, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/741938210
74. [74] E. Tulving, “Episodic memory: From mind to brain,” Annual Review of Psychology, Vol.53, No.1, pp. 1-25, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114
75. [75] D. C. Rubin, “The basic-systems model of episodic memory,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol.1, Issue 4, pp. 277-311, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00017.x
76. [76] B. M. Elzinga and J. D. Bremner, “Are the neural substrates of memory the final common pathway in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)?,” J. of Affective Disorders, Vol.70, Issue 1, pp. 1-17, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00351-2
77. [77] D. C. Rubin, D. Berntsen, and M. K. Bohni, “A memory-based model of posttraumatic stress disorder: Evaluating basic assumptions underlying the PTSD diagnosis,” Psychological Review, Vol.115, No.4, pp. 985-1011, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013397