single-rb.php

JRM Vol.37 No.5 pp. 1195-1203
doi: 10.20965/jrm.2025.p1195
(2025)

Paper:

Remote Driving of Tractor-Trailer Vehicles Based on Predictive Display

Yuichi Tazaki* ORCID Icon, Yuki Takeda*, Hikaru Nagano** ORCID Icon, Yasuyoshi Yokokohji* ORCID Icon, and Shota Kameoka***

*Graduate School of Engineering, Kobe University
1-1 Rokkodai-cho, Nada-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan

**Kyoto Institute of Technology
Matsugasaki Hashikami-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8585, Japan

***Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
8-1-1 Tsukaguchi-Honmachi, Amagasaki, Hyogo 661-8661, Japan

Received:
March 31, 2025
Accepted:
June 16, 2025
Published:
October 20, 2025
Keywords:
remote driving, vehicle teleoperation, predictive display, tractor-trailer vehicles
Abstract

This paper presents a remote driving system for tractor-trailer vehicles based on predictive display. The vehicle’s predicted trajectory is superimposed onto the delayed camera image stream by wire frame and presented to the driver wearing a head-mounted display. Predictive display helps the driver to compensate for delayed response of the vehicle as well as to intuitively grasp the spatial relationship between the vehicle and its surroundings. The effectiveness of the developed remote driving system was evaluated with human subjects through tasks simulating different scenes of transportation. The results showed that both efficiency and safety of driving were improved by predictive display.

Predictive display of tractor-trailer vehicle seen from third-person perspective

Predictive display of tractor-trailer vehicle seen from third-person perspective

Cite this article as:
Y. Tazaki, Y. Takeda, H. Nagano, Y. Yokokohji, and S. Kameoka, “Remote Driving of Tractor-Trailer Vehicles Based on Predictive Display,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.37 No.5, pp. 1195-1203, 2025.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] X. Xu, L. Zhang, Y. Jiang, and N. Chen, “Active control on path following and lateral stability for truck-trailer combinations,” Arabian J. for Science and Engineering, Vol.44, No.2, pp. 1365-1377, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3527-1
  2. [2] Y. Lee, T. Ahn, C. Lee, S. Kim, and K. Park, “A novel path planning algorithm for truck platooning using v2v communication,” Sensors, Vol.20, No.24, Article No.7022, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20247022
  3. [3] H. Woo, H. Tetsuka, and J. Gwak, “Automatic lane-changing system on congested highway,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.36, No.3, pp. 779-786, 2024. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2024.p0779
  4. [4] P. Raksincharoensak and Y. Akamatsu, “Development of collision avoidance system in right turn maneuver using vehicle-in-the-loop simulation,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.27, No.6, pp. 627-635, 2015. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2015.p0627
  5. [5] Z. Wang, A. Ahmad, R. Quirynen, Y. Wang, A. Bhagat, E. Zeino, Y. Zushi, and S. Di Cairano, “Motion planning and model predictive control for automated tractor-trailer hitching maneuver,” 2022 IEEE Conf. on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA), pp. 676-682, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCTA49430.2022.9966181
  6. [6] J. Davis, C. Smyth, and K. McDowell, “The effects of time lag on driving performance and a possible mitigation,” IEEE Trans. on Robotics, Vol.26, No.3, pp. 590-593, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2010.2046695
  7. [7] F. E. Chucholowski, S. Büchner, J. Reicheneder, and M. Lienkamp, “Prediction methods for teleoperated road vehicles,” Conf. on Future Automotive Technology – Focus Electromobility, 2013. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1470.3048
  8. [8] F. Chucholowski, “Evaluation of display methods for teleoperation of road vehicles,” The J. of Unmanned System Technology, Vol.3, No.3, 2015. https://doi.org/10.21535/just.v3i3.38
  9. [9] M. Brudnak, “Predictive displays for high latency teleoperation,” 2016 Ground Vehicle Systems Engineering and Technology Symposium, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-01-3607
  10. [10] Q. Zhang, Z. Xu, Y. Wang, L. Yang, X. Song, and Z. Huang, “Predicted trajectory guidance control framework of teleoperated ground vehicles compensating for delays,” IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology, Vol.72, No.9, pp. 11264-11274, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2023.3269517
  11. [11] J. Prakash, M. Vignati, E. Sabbioni, and F. Cheli, “Vehicle teleoperation: Successive reference-pose tracking to improve path tracking and to reduce time-delay induced instability,” 2022 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conf. (VPPC), 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC55846.2022.10003367
  12. [12] G. Graf, Y. Abdelrahman, H. Xu, Y. Abdrabou, D. Schitz, H. Hußmann, and F. Alt, “The predictive corridor: A virtual augmented driving assistance system for teleoperated autonomous vehicles,” Int. Conf. on Artificial Reality and Telexistence and Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2312/egve.20201260
  13. [13] A. Hosseini and M. Lienkamp, “Enhancing telepresence during the teleoperation of road vehicles using hmd-based mixed reality,” IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 1366-1373, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2016.7535568
  14. [14] S. Saparia, A. Schimpe, and L. Ferranti, “Active safety system for semi-autonomous teleoperated vehicles,” 2021 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Workshops (IV Workshops), pp. 141-147, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVWorkshops54471.2021.9669239
  15. [15] Y. Luo, J. Wang, H.-N. Liang, S. Luo, and E. G. Lim, “Monoscopic vs. stereoscopic views and display types in the teleoperation of unmanned ground vehicles for object avoidance,” 2021 30th IEEE Int. Conf. on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 418-425, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN50785.2021.9515455
  16. [16] Y. Tazaki, R. Marumoto, J. Ohgashira, H. Nagano, Y. Yokokohji, and S. Kameoka, “Experimental evaluation of the effect of predictive display on steering stability in remote driving,” Int. J. of Automotive Engineering, Vol.15, No.2, pp. 90-97, 2024. https://doi.org/10.20485/jsaeijae.15.2_90

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Oct. 19, 2025