single-au.php

IJAT Vol.19 No.5 pp. 921-929
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2025.p0921
(2025)

Research Paper:

Development of Model-Based Robot Polishing System: Measurement and Compensation for Robot Stiffness Distribution

Michio Uneda*1,† ORCID Icon, Kotaro Totsuka*2, Takamasa Yamamoto*3, and Norikazu Suzuki*4

*1Gifu University
1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu 501-1193, Japan

Corresponding author

*2Kanazawa Institute of Technology
Hakusan, Japan

*3Yamamoto Metal Technos
Osaka, Japan

*4Chuo University
Tokyo, Japan

Received:
February 28, 2025
Accepted:
July 25, 2025
Published:
September 5, 2025
Keywords:
collaborative robot, robot control, model-based approach, 3D polishing, stiffness distribution
Abstract

As the working-age population continues to decline, the use of robots in polishing processes is increasing. However, the integration of robots into these processes presents challenges, necessitating a model-based approach to understand and accommodate their characteristics. Although previous studies have developed robotic polishing systems, most have relied on imitating skilled technicians, with limited success. Additionally, attempts to implement such systems using feedback control have faced difficulties owing to response delays and system complexity. To address these challenges, this study developed an innovative robotic polishing system that operates without feedback control, aiming to reduce response-related limitations and simplify the system architecture. A stiffness distribution of the robot was measured, and a model-based framework was established. Polishing characteristics were investigated through experiments on a large-coated film plate. The results demonstrated that, by compensating for variations in polishing pressure due to the robot’s stiffness distribution, polishing in accordance with Preston’s law can be achieved.

Cite this article as:
M. Uneda, K. Totsuka, T. Yamamoto, and N. Suzuki, “Development of Model-Based Robot Polishing System: Measurement and Compensation for Robot Stiffness Distribution,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.19 No.5, pp. 921-929, 2025.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] International Federation of Robotics (IFR), “Executive Summary World Robotics 2023 Industrial Robots.” https://ifr.org/img/worldrobotics/Executive_Summary_WR_Industrial_Robots_2023.pdf [Accessed July 29, 2024]
  2. [2] R. Haraguchi and K. Uemura, “Industrial robots and use cases in the IoT era,” J. of the Robotics Society of Japan, Vol.37, No.8, pp. 690-693, 2019 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.7210/jrsj.37.690
  3. [3] X. Ke, Y. Yu, K. Li, T. Wang, B. Zhong, Z. Wang, L. Kong, J. Guo, L. Huang, M. Idir, C. Liu, and C. Wang, “Review on robot-assisted polishing: Status and future trends,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol.80, Issue C, Article No.102482, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102482
  4. [4] K. Shibuya and S. Issiki, “Evaluation of metallic mold surfaces polished by an industrial robot with stick whetstones,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.8, No.2, pp. 253-263, 2014. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2014.p0253
  5. [5] R. Sato, Y. Ito, S. Mizuura, and K. Shirase, “Vibration mode and motion trajectory simulations of an articulated robot by a dynamic model considering joint bearing stiffness,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.15, No.5, pp. 631-640, 2021. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2021.p0631
  6. [6] F. Tian, Z. Li, C. Lv, and G. Liu, “Polishing pressure investigations of robot automatic polishing on curved surfaces,” Int. J. of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.87, pp. 639-646, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8527-2
  7. [7] Y. Nagatomo, T. Mizoguchi, and K. Ohnishi, “Development of multi-axis robot system aiming at direct teaching by skilled workers and evaluation of basic characteristics of polishing,” The Proc. of Conf. of Tokai Branch, Japan Society of Precision Engineering, Vol.251, 2021.
  8. [8] H. Ochoa and R. Cortesão, “Impedance control architecture for robotic-assisted mold polishing based on human demonstration,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, Vol.69, Issue 4, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2021.3073310
  9. [9] J. Li, Y. Guan, H. Chen, B. Wang, T. Zhang, X. Liu, J. Hong, D. Wang, and H. Zhang, “A high-bandwidth end-effector with active force control for robotic polishing,” IEEE Access, Vol.8, pp. 169122-169135, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3022930
  10. [10] Y. Dong, T. Ren, K. Hu, D. Wu, and K. Chen, “Contact force detection and control for robotic polishing based on joint torque sensors,” The Int. J. of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.107, pp. 2745-2756, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05162-8
  11. [11] J. Hong, A. E. K. Mohammad, and D. Wang, “Improved design of the end-effector for macro-mini robotic polishing systems,” Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conf. on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering (ICMRE 2017), pp. 36-41, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/3068796.3068809
  12. [12] Y. Kakinuma, S. Ogawa, and K. Kato, “Robot polishing control with an active end effector based on macro-micro mechanism and the extended Preston’s law,” CIRP Annals, Vol.71, Issue 1, pp. 341-344, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2022.04.074
  13. [13] T. Yamamoto, R. Matsuda, M. Shindou, T. Hirogaki, and E. Aoyama, “Polishing system with integrated five axis controlled machine tools and cooperative robots based on wireless communication and acquisition of servo information,” Int. J. of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, Vol.11, No.11, 2022. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijmerr.11.11.801-806
  14. [14] K. Wu, J. Li, H. Zhao, and Y. Zhong, “Review of industrial robot stiffness identification and modelling,” Applied Sciences, Vol.12, Issue 17, Article No.8719, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178719
  15. [15] P. Xu, X. Yao, S. Liu, H. Wang, K. Liu, A. S. Kumar, W. F. Lu, and G. Bi, “Stiffness modeling of an industrial robot with a gravity compensator considering link weights,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol.161, Article No.104331, 2021.
  16. [16] F. W. Preston, “The theory and design of plate glass polishing machines,” J. of the Society of Glass Technology, Vol.11, pp. 214-256, 1927.
  17. [17] M. Uneda, K. Saito, K. Tenkou, K. Hotta, and H. Morinaga, “Slurry behavior on traverse polishing of large-scale objects using small-diameter pads,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.19, No.2, pp. 133-140, 2025. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2025.p0133
  18. [18] E. Abele, M. Weigold, and S. Rothenbücher, “Modeling and identification of an industrial robot for machining applications,” CIRP Annals, Vol.56, Issue 1, pp. 387-390, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.090
  19. [19] Y. Song, M. Liu, B. Lian, Y. Qi, Y. Wang, J. Wu, and Q. Li, “Industrial serial robot calibration considering geometric and deformation errors,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol.76, Issue C, Article No.102328, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102328
  20. [20] J.-Y. K’Nevez, M. Cherif, M. Zapciu, and A. Gerard, “Experimental characterization of robot arm rigidity in order to be used in machining operation,” Proc. in Manufacturing Systems, Vol.5, No.3, pp. 153-156, 2010.
  21. [21] S.-C. Lin and M.-L. Wu, “A study of the effects of polishing parameters on material removal rate and non-uniformity,” Int. J. of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol.42, Issue 1, pp. 99-103, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00089-X
  22. [22] P. Wu, N. Liu, X. Li, and Y. Zhu, “Material removal rate model for chemical–mechanical polishing of single-crystal SiC substrates using agglomerated diamond abrasive,” Precision Engineering, Vol.88, pp. 572-583, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2024.04.002

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Sep. 05, 2025