Conventional assessments of soil liquefaction risk are based on simplified methods using penetration test results. In this approach, soil density is estimated from penetration resistance, and liquefaction strength is calculated based on the estimated soil density. However, this method primarily evaluates risks associated with excess pore water pressure build-up during an earthquake and does not account for changes in water pressure caused by the movement of pore water during and after the earthquake. It is anticipated these effects will be significant when an impermeable layer exists at or below the ground surface, or when long duration seismic motion occurs. Considering the above, two cases of geotechnical centrifugal model tests with and without impermeable surface layer were performed to evaluate its influence on the liquefaction behaviors of soil strata. Long duration sinusoidal motions of various intensities were applied to the specimens. Based on the test results, the surface layer permeability had a significant influence on pore water pressure buildup in the liquefiable strata beneath the surface layer, especially in the shallower portion of the soil. In addition, by plotting the relationships between response accelerations and excess pore water pressure, the liquefaction strength of the ground was assessed. These relationships showed a high potential for evaluating the liquefaction strength of “geo-structures,” and consider not only the properties of “geo-material” determined from cyclic triaxial tests but also the influence of surface layer permeability. Defining the geo-structural liquefaction strength under various conditions is expected to lead to the establishment of a more reasonable method for assessing soil liquefaction risk.

1. [1] R. Motamed, I. Towhata, T. Honda, K. Tabata, and A. Abe, “Pile group response to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading: E-Defense large shake table test,” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., Vol.51, pp. 35-46, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.04.007
2. [2] S. Yasuda, I. Towhata, I. Ishii, S. Sato, and T. Uchimura, “Liquefaction-induced damage to structures during the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake,” J. JSCE, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 181-193, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2208/journalofjsce.1.1_181
3. [3] The Overseas Coastal Area Development Institute of Japan, “Technical standards and commentaries for port and harbour facilities in Japan,” 2009.
4. [4] Japan Road Association, “Specifications for highway bridges: Part V seismic design,” 2016.
5. [5] Architectural Institute of Japan, “Recommendations for design of building foundations,” 2019 (in Japanese).
6. [6] K. Ishihara, “Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes,” Geotechnique, Vol.43, No.3, pp. 351-451, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.3.351
7. [7] Y. Umehara, K. Zen, and K. Hamada, “Evaluation of soil liquefaction potentials in partially drained conditions,” Soils Found., Vol.25, No.2, pp. 57-72, 1985. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.25.2_57
8. [8] M. Okamura, T. H. Abdoun, R. Dobry, M. K. Sharp, and V. M. Toboada, “Effects of sand permeability and weak aftershocks on earthquake-induced lateral spreading,” Soils Found., Vol.41, No.6, pp. 63-77, 2001. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.41.6_63
9. [9] Y. P. Vaid and A. Eliadorani, “Undrained and drained (?) stress-strain response,” Can. Geotech. J., Vol.37, No.5, pp. 1126-1130, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1139/t00-036
10. [10] R. Kamai and R. W. Boulanger, “Single-element simulations of partial-drainage effects under monotonic and cyclic loading,” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., Vol.35, pp. 29-40, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.10.002
11. [11] K. Ishihara and M. Yoshimine, “Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes,” Soils Found., Vol.32, No.1, pp. 173-188, 1992. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.32.173
12. [12] K. Ishihara, K. Harada, W. F. Lee, C. C. Chan, and A. M. M. Safiullah, “Post-liquefaction settlement analyses based on the volume change characteristics of undisturbed and reconstituted samples,” Soils Found., Vol.56, No.3, pp. 533-546, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2016.04.019
13. [13] N. Sento, M. Kazama, R. Uzuoka, H. Ohmura, and M. Ishimaru, “Possibility of postliquefaction flow failure due to seepage,” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol.130, No.7, pp. 707-716, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:7(707)
14. [14] Y. P. Vaid and A. Eliadorani, “Instability and liquefaction of granular soils under undrained and partially drained states,” Can. Geotech. J., Vol.35, No.6, pp. 1053-1062, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-061
15. [15] J. Wang, M. Sato, N. Yoshida, H. Kurose, and K. Ozeki, “Liquefaction analysis of seawall structures under both drained and undrained conditions,” 12th World Conf. Earthq. Eng. (WCEE), 2000.
16. [16] O. Adamidis and S. P. G. Madabhushi, “Experimental investigation of drainage during earthquake-induced liquefaction,” Geotechnique, Vol.68, No.8, pp. 655-665, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.090
17. [17] H. Akamoto, M. Miyake, M. Wada, and A. Murayama, “Liquefaction of the ground reclaimed by urban refuse ash,” Proc. Int. Conf. Centrifuge 94, pp. 251-255, 1994.
18. [18] T. Satoh, K. Tsurugasaki, T. Nagata, and M. Miyake, “Deformation of caisson type quay wall during earthquake,” Proc. Int. Conf. Centrifuge 98, pp. 339-344, 1998.
19. [19] National Research Council, “Liquefaction of soils during earthquakes,” The National Academies Press, 1985. https://doi.org/10.17226/19275
20. [20] Architectural Institute of Japan, “Recommendations for design of small building foundations,” 2008 (in Japanese).
21. [21] N. Sento, M. Kazama, and R. Uzuoka, “Experiment and idealization of the volumetric compression characteristics of clean sand after undrained cyclic shear,” J. JSCE, Vol.2004, No.764, pp. 307-317, 2004 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej.2004.764_307
22. [22] T. Unno, N. Sento, Y. Ono, and K. Hayashi, “A method for evaluating volumetric strain resulting from liquefaction of sandy soil based on cyclic shear strain history,” J. Jpn. Soc. Civ. Eng., Ser. C (Geosph. Eng.), Vol.68, No.4, pp. 680-694, 2012 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejge.68.680
23. [23] T. Kokusho, “Current state of research on flow failure considering void redistribution in liquefied deposits,” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., Vol.23, No.7, pp. 585-603, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(03)00067-8