In the 2015 earthquake in Gorkha, Nepal, damaged different kinds of structures around the Kathmandu Basin. On the other hand, in mountainous areas, it was confirmed that gabion structures such as retaining walls along roads showed their high flexibility by performing their functions. In this paper, based on the results of the damage field survey on gabion retaining walls, a full-scale shake table test is conducted to evaluate the earthquake resistance of gabion retaining walls on roads, which are a common site in Nepal. The soil container used for the full-scale shake table test has the following internal dimensions: 4.0 m height, 3.1 m width, and 11.5 m depth. Earthen bank retaining walls with height of 3 m were arranged in three rows in a perpendicular direction to the cross-section, and the ground behind the retaining wall was prepared. The sinusoidal waves of 3 Hz were applied, consisting of 2 s of gradual increase, 4 s of steady part, and 2 s of gradual decrease; the input waves were provided in four stages of acceleration amplitude. Three types of gabion retaining walls were considered, i.e., vertical-type, stepwise-type and gravity-type, and 3D terrestrial laser measurement was conducted before and after shake table test of each case. Comparison of the residual deformations of the gabion retaining walls measured by 3D terrestrial laser showed that the vertical-type wall did not collapse but tilted forward after the shake teble test. A similar damage situation was confirmed by the field survey in Nepal. The other two cases suffered only slight deformation and are considered to be effective structures for application on sites. Finally, the trial wedge method was applied to the experimental results of the vertical-type of gabion retaining and useful suggestions for future earthquake-resistant design were made by comparing the active collapse angle with the positions of deformation, such as cracking which occurred in the ground behind the retaining wall after shaking. Then, the applicability of trial wedge method and its problem in the design of gabion retaining wall were shown.

1. [1] H. Nakazawa, S. Manandhar, T. Hara, D. Suetsugu, K. Kuribayashi, T. Nishi, T. Sakuraba, T. Kariya, Y. Ko-chi, and H. Hazarika, “Report on damages caused by the 2015 Nepal Gorkha Earthquake,” JAEE Int. Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 2-36, 2015.
2. [2] T. Hara, D. Suetsugu, S. Manandhar, H. Nakazawa, K. Kuribayashi, T. Nishi, T. Sakuraba, T. Kariya, Y. Kochi, and H. Hazarika, “Damage survey on gabion structures in the 2015 Nepal Gorkha Earthquake – Outline of survey –,” 51st Japan National Conf. on Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 1657-1658, 2016 (in Japanese).
3. [3] H. Nakazawa, T. Hara, D. Suetsugu, K. Kuribayashi, T. Nishi, H. Zhang, and Bhattarai, P. K., “Damage survey on gabion structures in the 2015 Nepal Gorkha Earthquake – Survey of gabion structures in current states –,” 51st Japan National Conf. on Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 1659-1660, 2016 (in Japanese).
4. [4] D. Suetsugu, T. Hara, H. Nakazawa, K. Kuribayashi, D. Shinagawa, T. Nishi, and H. Zhang, “Damage survey on gabion structures in the 2015 Nepal Gorkha Earthquake – Physical properties of stone materials packed in the gabion –,” 51st Japan National Conf. on Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 1661-1662, 2016 (in Japanese).
5. [5] K. Kuribayashi, T. Nishi, H. Zhang, Bhattarai, P. K., T. Hara, D. Suetsugu, and H. Nakazawa, “Damage survey on gabion structures in the 2015 Nepal Gorkha Earthquake – Construction method to filling materials in gabions –,” 51st Japan National Conf. on Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 1663-1664, 2016 (in Japanese).
6. [6] Kenting Earth Scinence Ltd., “Reports–Land Resource Mapping Project: Report to HMG Nepal,” Ministry of Home and Water Induced Prevention Technical Centre, HMG/Nepal, Photo albam: Disaster of July 1993 in Nepal, 1993.
7. [7] Water and Energy Commission Secretariat, HMG Nepal, “Erosion an sedimentation in Nepal Himalaya – An assessment of rever processes,” Kefford Press, Singapore, pp. 10-11, 1987.
8. [8] Ministry of Physical Planning and Works, “Mandatory Rules of Thumb Reinforced Concrete Buildings without Masonry Infill,” Nepal National Building Code, 30pp., 1994.
9. [9] Japan Jakago Association, “Guide and commentary on gabion engineering method,” 122pp., 2008 (in Japanese).
10. [10] Gavernment of Nepal, “Machine Fabricated Gabions-Nepal,” 2016.
11. [11] Association of Nationwide Disaster Prevention and Japan River Association, “Knowledge of gabion,” 166pp., 1963 (in Japanese).
12. [12] T. Hara, H. Nakazawa, D. Suetsugu, K. Kuribayashi, T. Nishi, Y. Tadokoro, K. Miyoshi, and H. Zhang, “Field Survey on Damages of Gabion Structures Caused by the 2015 Nepal Gokha Earthquake and Examination of Specific Measures for Earthquake Resistance Improvement,” Proc. of the 37th JSCE Earthquake Engineering Symposium, pp. 1-10, 2017 (in Japanese).
13. [13] D. D. Langton, “The Panda lightweight penetrometer for soil investigation and monitoring material compaction,” Ground Engineering, pp. 33-36, 1999.
14. [14] K. Usukura, H. Nakazawa, T. Hara, D. Suetsugu, T. Nishi, K. Kuribayashi, and Y. Tadokoro, “Full-scale shake table test on evaluation of earthquake resistance gabion retaining wall for road – estimation of residual deformation and cracks occurred in the ground behind the retaining wall –,” Proc. of the 13th Annual Meeting of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering, pp. 1-16, 2017 (in Japanese).