Top > JDR > Attempt to Typify Disaster Educational Programs – Case S ...

single-dr.php

JDR Vol.10 No.2 pp. 210-216
(2015)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2015.p0210

Paper:

Views over last 60 days: 847

Attempt to Typify Disaster Educational Programs – Case Study of the Disaster Management Education Challenge Plan

Kota Tomoyasu*, Reo Kimura*, and Haruo Hayashi**

*Graduate School of Human Science and Environment, Hyogo University
1-1-12, Shinzaike-honcho, Himeji, Hyogo 670-0092, Japan

**Disaster Prevention Research Institute (DPRI), Kyoto University
Gokasho, Uji-shi, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan

Received:
October 24, 2014
Accepted:
January 28, 2015
Published:
April 1, 2015
Creative Commons License
Keywords:
disaster education, educational program, disaster management education challenge plan, typification, cluster analysis
Abstract
This study analyzes the disaster educational programs that were implemented under the “Disaster Management Education Challenge Plan,” an education project supported by the Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. In this study, cluster analysis of the characteristics of the disaster educational programs led to categorization of the programs into four types. The results are expected to encourage the general public to launch disaster management educational activities that incorporate practice cases from each of the four types of programs, and will likely spur the development of further programs.
Cite this article as:
K. Tomoyasu, R. Kimura, and H. Hayashi, “Attempt to Typify Disaster Educational Programs – Case Study of the Disaster Management Education Challenge Plan,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.10 No.2, pp. 210-216, 2015.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] R. Kimura, H. Hayashi, S. Suzuki, K. Kobayashi, K. Urabe, S. Inoue, and T. Nishino, “Systematization and sharing of disaster management literacy by DMLH,” Journal of Disaster Research, Vol.9, No.2, pp. 176-187, 2014.
  2. [2] R. Kimura, H. Hayashi, and K. Tamura, “Which persons and organizations will be relied upon the most in the case of the next major disaster? – Results from random sampled social surveys of disaster victims of the 1995 Kobe earthquake and the 2004 Mid-Niigata earthquake disaster –,” 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering Conf. Proc., CD-ROM, 8pp., 2008.
  3. [3] Committee for Promoting a Nationwide Movement for Disaster Reduction, “Basic framework for promoting a nationwide movement for disaster reduction,” 2006, http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/workshop/ forum/070130/panel-nishikawa2textunderscore01.pdf  [accessed October 1, 2014] 
  4. [4] “Disaster management education challenge plan,” http://www. bosai-study.net/top.html  [accessed October 1, 2014] .
  5. [5] Japan Cabinet Office, “The guidelines for evacuation support of people requiring assistance during a disaster,” 2006 (in Japanese), http://www.bousai.go.jp/taisaku/youengo/060328/pdf/ hinanguide.pdf  [accessed October 1, 2014] 
  6. [6] A. Matsumoto and S. Tatsuki, “Study of casualties of elderly and disabled people by the analysis of aggregate data by the local municipalities in the Great East Japan Earthquake,” Journal of Social Safety Science, No.18, pp. 241-250, 2012 (in Japanese).
  7. [7] R. Ueda, “Multiple regression analysis of human damage due to the tsunami in the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake – Synthetic study characteristics of tsunami and social factors –,” Journal of Social Safety Science, No.18, pp. 443-450, 2012 (in Japanese).

Creative Commons License  This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 05, 2024