Top > JDR > How Business Flow Diagram’s Improve Continuity of Operat ...

single-dr.php

JDR Vol.5 No.5 pp. 494-502
(2010)
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2010.p0494

Paper:

Views over last 60 days: 320

How Business Flow Diagram’s Improve Continuity of Operations Planning

Go Urakawa* and Haruo Hayashi**

*Institute of Sustainability Science, Kyoto University, Gokasho, Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan

**Disaster Prevention Research Institute (DPRI), Kyoto University, Gokasho, Uji, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan

Received:
November 24, 2009
Accepted:
September 1, 2010
Published:
October 1, 2010
Creative Commons License
Keywords:
post-disaster operations manual, BIA, business continuity, BFD, project management, workshop, social capital
Abstract
Efforts to create manuals on measures for effectively implementing post-disaster operations pose two problems - (1) Many practitioners have no practical experience in post-disaster operations and (2) Formats and methods depend on personal skills and effort. In this paper, we discuss how to extract priority operations using business impact analysis (BIA) based on business continuity plans and develop the projectmanagement-based business flow diagram (BFD) and workflow to support practical post-disaster operations. This approach focuses on creating manuals on enhancing responder awareness through workshops for building social capital.
Cite this article as:
G. Urakawa and H. Hayashi, “How Business Flow Diagram’s Improve Continuity of Operations Planning,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.5 No.5, pp. 494-502, 2010.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] The Cabinet Office,
    http://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/chubou/taisaku_syuto/syuto_top.html
  2. [2] H. Taguchi and H. Hayashi, “Development of Evaluation Procedure for the Standardization of Emergency Response Plan Using FC-IDEF0 –Kobe City Case Study–: Modeling Disaster Manuals,” Journal of Society Safety Science, No.4, pp. 267-274, 2002.
  3. [3] H. Taguchi and H. Hayashi, “Development of Evaluation Procedure for the Standardization of Emergency Response Plan Using FC-IDEF0 –Kobe City Case Study–,” Journal of Society Safety Science, No.5, pp. 203-212, 2003.
  4. [4] “ISO/TC223 : Societal security – Guideline for incident preparedness and operational continuity management (ISO/PAS22399),” 31pp., 2007.
  5. [5] K. Takeuchi, H. Hayashi, Go Urakawa, M. Inoguchi, and S. Sato, “Development of “Visualization” Method of Crisis Response Operations –A Case Study in Shiga Prefecture Crisis Management Plan Development–,” Journal of Society Safety Science, No.9, pp. 111-120, 2007.
  6. [6] Y. Yamada, H. Hayashi, G. Urakawa, and K. Takeuchi, “The Development of Standardized Drafting Procedure for Emergency Response Manual –A Case Study at Kashihara City, Nara Prefecture–,” Journal of Society Safety Science, No.10, pp. 67-76, 2008.
  7. [7] P. S. Royer, “Project Risk Management: A Proactive Approach,” 2002.
  8. [8] G. T. Haugan, “Effective Work Breakdown Structures,” 2002.
  9. [9] G. Miller, “The Magical Number SevenPlus or Minus Two,” The Psychological Review, Vol.63, pp. 81-97, 1956.
  10. [10] D. J. Bowersox, “Logistical Management,” Mcgraw-Hill College, 52pp., 1996.
  11. [11] “Project Management Institute,” PMBOK GUIDE, 2000.

Creative Commons License  This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationa License.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Apr. 22, 2024