single-jc.php

JACIII Vol.30 No.4 pp. 1004-1014
(2026)

Research Paper:

Fault Detection and Diagnosis Based on Sparse Autoencoder for Tunnel Drilling Rig in Underground Coal Mine

Haitao Song*1,*2, Shatie Zuo*3, Aoxue Yang*1,*4,*5,†, Yafeng Yao*2, and Xuzhi Lai*1,*4,*5

*1School of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, China University of Geosciences
No.388 Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China

*2CCTEG Xi’an Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd.
No.82 Jinye 1st Road, Gaoxin District, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710077, China

*3School of Future Technology, China University of Geosciences
No.388 Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China

*4Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Control and Intelligent Automation for Complex Systems
No.388 Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China

*5Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Technology for Geo-Exploration, Ministry of Education
No.388 Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China

Corresponding author

Received:
November 27, 2025
Accepted:
January 27, 2026
Published:
July 20, 2026
Keywords:
tunnel drilling rig, fault detection, sparse autoencoder, multivariate time-series
Abstract

Tunnel drilling rig is the key equipment used for exploration in underground coal mine. Because it operates for long periods in environments characterized by high humidity, intense vibration, pressure fluctuations, and unstable geological formations, various faults tend to appear frequently. If these faults are not identified in time, they may gradually worsen and ultimately result in severe accidents. Traditional fault detection methods mainly rely on manual inspection, which makes it difficult to obtain reliable information and respond effectively under complex and changing working conditions. To overcome these shortcomings, this study proposes a fault detection approach based on a sparse autoencoder. The raw signals, including pressure, speed, and feed rate, are first preprocessed. After that, a normal operating model of the drilling rig is learned through the sparse autoencoder. Faults are then detected by comparing the real-time reconstruction errors with a preset threshold. Finally, experiments based on actual drilling data are performed, and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Cite this article as:
H. Song, S. Zuo, A. Yang, Y. Yao, and X. Lai, “Fault Detection and Diagnosis Based on Sparse Autoencoder for Tunnel Drilling Rig in Underground Coal Mine,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.30 No.4, pp. 1004-1014, 2026.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] H. Wang, J. Zhou, H. Chen, B. Xu, and Z. Shen, “Hydraulic system fault diagnosis decoupling method based on 2D time-series modeling and self-attention fusion,” Scientific Reports, Vol.14, Article No.15620, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66541-9
  2. [2] D.-H. Yoon and J. Yoon, “Development of a real-time fault detection method for electric power system via transformer-based deep learning model,” Int. J. of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol.159, Article No.110069, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.110069
  3. [3] T. Li et al., “WaveletKernelNet: An interpretable deep neural network for industrial intelligent diagnosis,” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, Vol.52, No.4, pp. 2302-2312, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2020.3048950
  4. [4] W. Zhang, X. Li, H. Ma, Z. Luo, and X. Li, “Universal domain adaptation in fault diagnostics with hybrid weighted deep adversarial learning,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Informatics, Vol.17, No.12, pp. 7957-7967, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3064377
  5. [5] W. Su, Z. Han, X. Liu, and Y. Yin, “Generalized universal domain adaptation,” Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol.302, Article No.112344, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112344
  6. [6] R. Zhao et al., “Machine health monitoring using local feature-based gated recurrent unit networks,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, Vol.65, No.2, pp. 1539-1548, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.2733438
  7. [7] O. Janssens et al., “Convolutional neural network based fault detection for rotating machinery,” J. of Sound and Vibration, Vol.377, pp. 331-345, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2016.05.027
  8. [8] Y. Lei et al., “Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: A review and roadmap,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol.138, Article No.106587, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106587
  9. [9] M. Xia et al., “Intelligent fault diagnosis of machinery using digital twin-assisted deep transfer learning,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol.215, Article No.107938, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107938
  10. [10] L. Zhang et al., “End-to-end unsupervised fault detection using a flow-based model,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol.215, Article No.107805, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107805
  11. [11] N. N. Kulkarni, N. A. Valente, and A. Sabato, “Time-inferred autoencoder: A noise adaptive condition monitoring tool,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol.204, Article No.110789, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110789
  12. [12] X. Chen, H. Liu, and N. Nikitas, “Internal pump leakage detection of the hydraulic systems with highly incomplete flow data,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol.56, Article No.101974, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.101974
  13. [13] K. Huang, S. Wu, F. Li, C. Yang, and W. Gui, “Fault diagnosis of hydraulic systems based on deep learning model with multirate data samples,” IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, Vol.33, No.11, pp. 6789-6801, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3083401
  14. [14] B. Wang, Z. Li, Z. Dai, N. Lawrence, and X. Yan, “Data-driven mode identification and unsupervised fault detection for nonlinear multimode processes,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Informatics, Vol.16, No.6, pp. 3651-3661, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2019.2942650
  15. [15] S. Zheng, C. Wang, E. Zio, and J. Liu, “Fault detection in complex mechatronic systems by a hierarchical graph convolution attention network based on causal paths,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol.243, Article No.109872, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109872
  16. [16] A. Dallabona, M. Blanke, H. C. Pedersen, and D. Papageorgiou, “Fault diagnosis and prognosis capabilities for wind turbine hydraulic pitch systems,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol.224, Article No.111941, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111941
  17. [17] C. Lai, P. Baraldi, and E. Zio, “Physics-informed deep autoencoder for fault detection in new-design systems,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol.215, Article No.111420, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111420
  18. [18] M. Rao, M. J. Zuo, and Z. Tian, “A speed normalized autoencoder for rotating machinery fault detection under varying speed conditions,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol.189, Article No.110109, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110109
  19. [19] B. Song et al., “A fault-targeted gated recurrent unit-canonical correlation analysis method for incipient fault detection,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Informatics, Vol.20, No.6, pp. 8739-8748, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2024.3372023
  20. [20] X. Kong, X. Li, Q. Zhou, Z. Hu, and C. Shi, “Attention recurrent autoencoder hybrid model for early fault diagnosis of rotating machinery,” IEEE Trans. on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol.70, Article No.2505110, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3051948
  21. [21] Z.-H. Liu et al., “A stacked auto-encoder based partial adversarial domain adaptation model for intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machines,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Informatics, Vol.17, No.10, pp. 6798-6809, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.3045002
  22. [22] W. Sun et al., “A sparse auto-encoder-based deep neural network approach for induction motor faults classification,” Measurement, Vol.89, pp. 171-178, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.007
  23. [23] M. Niu, H. Jiang, Z. Wu, and H. Shao, “An enhanced sparse autoencoder for machinery interpretable fault diagnosis,” Measurement Science and Technology, Vol.35, No.5, Article No.055108, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ad24ba

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Jul. 19, 2026