single-au.php

IJAT Vol.17 No.4 pp. 356-368
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2023.p0356
(2023)

Research Paper:

Process Planning with Removal of Melting Penetration and Temper Colors in 5-Axis Hybrid Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing

Akira Nishiyama*, Shun Kayashima**, Nobuyuki Sumi**, Takashi Hashimoto**, Takeyuki Abe*,† ORCID Icon, and Jun’ichi Kaneko*

*Division of Mechanical engineering, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University
255 Shimo-okubo, Sakura-ku, Saitama, Saitama 338-8570, Japan

Corresponding author

**Industrial Mechatronics Systems Works, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
Nagoya, Japan

Received:
December 28, 2022
Accepted:
April 26, 2023
Published:
July 5, 2023
Keywords:
hybrid manufacturing, process planning, directed energy deposition, subtractive manufacturing, temper color
Abstract

Hybrid manufacturing (HM), which combines additive manufacturing (AM) and subtractive manufacturing (SM), is effective for the fabrication of thin-walled complex shapes, such as impeller blades. Generally, a process planning for HM is to build a near-net shape through AM and finish its surface through SM. However, in this approach, the cutting tools are limited with long tool lengths and small tool diameters to avoid collisions between the cutting tool and workpiece. In addition, the fabrication shapes are also limited. Therefore, one possible solution is to alternate between AM and SM processes multiple times. In this approach, the workpieces are built gradually as the process progresses. Therefore, the cutting tool can easily avoid collision with the workpiece. However, melting penetration and temper color remain on the finished surfaces using the conventional process planning method with alternate multiple switching. In this process planning, AM and SM processes are alternated. Thus, the finished surfaces are remelted in the subsequent AM process. This heat input causes melting penetration and temper color. These thermal effects must be prevented because these can lead to unfinished part and deterioration of the appearance of the workpieces. Therefore, in this study, a novel process planning method that allows alternate multiple switches without thermal effects is proposed. In addition, a process planning support system that simulates SM process was developed. The SM simulation can detect collision between the cutting tool and workpiece. Using the proposed process planning method, the system plans a process in which thermal effects will not occur. In addition, a case study was conducted using a simulated impeller blade geometry. The results of the case study showed that the developed system could plan by using several cutting tools and parameters of the machining head. The system can estimate the processing time based on the cutting tool path, deposition path, SM process conditions, and AM process conditions. The results validated the developed system and demonstrated its usefulness.

Cite this article as:
A. Nishiyama, S. Kayashima, N. Sumi, T. Hashimoto, T. Abe, and J. Kaneko, “Process Planning with Removal of Melting Penetration and Temper Colors in 5-Axis Hybrid Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.17 No.4, pp. 356-368, 2023.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] M. Motta, A. G. Demir, and B. Previtali, “High-speed imaging and process characterization of coaxial laser metal wire deposition,” Additive Manufacturing, Vol.22, pp. 497-507, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.043
  2. [2] S. C. Subedi, A. Shahba, M. Thevamaran, D. J. Thoma, and K. Suresh, “Towards the optimal design of support structures for laser powder bed fusion-based metal additive manufacturing via thermal equivalent static loads,” Additive Manufacturing, Vol.57, 102956, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102956
  3. [3] B. Zheng, S. Yu, L. Tang, and Y. Shi, “Directed energy deposition-arc of aluminum-alloy curved-generatrix-shell pyramid lattice structure,” J. of Manufacturing Processes, Vol.84, pp. 587-599, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.040
  4. [4] W. Zhang, Y. Xu, Y. Shi, G. Su, Y. Gu, and K. Volodymyr, “Intergranular corrosion characteristics of high-efficiency wire laser additive manufactured Inconel 625 alloys,” Corrosion Science, Vol.205, 110422, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2022.110422
  5. [5] Y. Gong and P. Li, “Analysis of tool wear performance and surface quality in post milling of additive manufactured 316L stainless steel,” J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol.33, No.5, pp. 2387-2395, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-0237-x
  6. [6] L. Chen, K. Xu, and K. Tang, “Optimized sequence planning for multi-axis hybrid machining of complex geometries,” Computers & Graphics, Vol.70, pp. 176-187, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2017.07.018
  7. [7] M. Behandish, S. Nelaturi, and J. de Kleer, “Automated process planning for hybrid manufacturing,” Computer-Aided Design, Vol.102, pp. 115-127, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2018.04.022
  8. [8] N. Chen and M. Frank, “Process planning for hybrid additive and subtractive manufacturing to integrate machining and directed energy deposition,” Procedia Manufacturing, Vol.34, pp. 205-213, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.140
  9. [9] I. Kono, T. Miyamoto, K. Utsumi, K. Nishikawa, H. Onozuka, J. Hirai, and N. Sugita, “Study on machining vibration suppression with multiple tuned mass dampers: Vibration control for long fin machining,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.11, No.2, pp. 206-214, 2017. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2017.p0206
  10. [10] Y. Yang, Y. Gong, C. Li, X. Wen, and J. Sun, “Mechanical performance of 316 L stainless steel by hybrid directed energy deposition and thermal milling process,” J. of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.291, 117023, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.117023
  11. [11] Y. Zhou, T. Xing, Y. Song, Y. Li, X. Zhu, G. Li, and S. Ding, “Digital-twin-driven geometric optimization of centrifugal impeller with free-form blades for five-axis flank milling,” J. of Manufacturing Systems, Vol.58, Part B, pp. 22-35, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.019
  12. [12] C.-S. Jun, K. Cha, and Y.-S. Lee, “Optimizing tool orientations for 5-axis machining by configuration-space search method,” Computer-Aided Design, Vol.35, No.6, pp. 549-566, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(02)00077-5
  13. [13] T. Nakano, N. Sugita, T. Kato, K. Fujiwara, N. Abe, T. Ozaki, M. Suzuki, and M. Mitsuishi, “Interference free tool path generation in multi-axis milling machine for orthopedic surgery,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.3, No.5, pp. 514-522, 2009. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2009.p0514
  14. [14] S. Ibaraki, A. Matsubara, and M. Murozumi, “Efficiency comparison of cutting strategies for end milling processes under feedrate scheduling,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.2, No.5, pp. 377-383, 2008. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2008.p0377
  15. [15] Z. Zhou, H. Shen, J. Lin, B. Liu, and X. Sheng, “Continuous tool-path planning for optimizing thermo-mechanical properties in wire-arc additive manufacturing: An evolutional method,” J. of Manufacturing Processes, Vol.83, pp. 354-373, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.09.009
  16. [16] M. Boissier, G. Allaire, and C. Tournier, “Time dependent scanning path optimization for the powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process,” Computer-Aided Design, Vol.142, 103122, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2021.103122
  17. [17] K. Patel, J. Fei, G. Liu, and T. Özel, “Milling investigations and yield strength calculations for nickel alloy Inconel 625 manufactured with laser powder bed fusion process,” Production Engineering, Vol.13, No.6, pp. 693-702, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-019-00922-2
  18. [18] X. Xiao and S. Joshi, “Process planning for five-axis support free additive manufacturing,” Additive Manufacturing, Vol.36, 101569, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101569
  19. [19] M. Moussa and H. ElMaraghy, “Multiple platforms design and product family process planning for combined additive and subtractive manufacturing,” J. of Manufacturing Systems, Vol.61, pp. 509-529, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.09.019
  20. [20] R. Sarma, S. Kapil, and S. N. Joshi, “Development of a framework for computer aided design and manufacturing of 3 axis hybrid wire arc additive manufacturing,” Materials Today: Proc., Vol.62, Part 14, pp. 7625-7634, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.011
  21. [21] L. Chen, T. Y. Lau, and K. Tang, “Manufacturability analysis and process planning for additive and subtractive hybrid manufacturing of Quasi-rotational parts with columnar features,” Computer-Aided Design, Vol.118, 102759, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2019.102759
  22. [22] T. Abe, T. Kataoka, S. Kayashima, N. Sumi, T. Hashimoto, and J. Kaneko, “Determination of alternation sequence for additive and subtractive manufacturing based on subtractive manufacturing simulation,” Precision Engineering, Vol.80, pp. 160-170, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2022.12.002
  23. [23] R. Nemoto and K. Horioka, “Color stainless steel,” Corrosion Engineering, Vol.35, No.2, pp. 124-125, 1986 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.3323/jcorr1974.35.2_124
  24. [24] D. Morita, N. Shinohara, Y. Nakano, T. Hashimoto, and Y. Ukai, “Dot forming technology by laser wire direct energy deposition (DED) type metal 3D printer,” The Review of Laser Engineering, Vol.48, No.8, pp. 431-435, 2020 (in Japanese).
  25. [25] K. Watanabe, J. Kaneko, and K. Horio, “Development of tool collision avoidance method adapted to uncut workpiece shape,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.11, No.2, pp. 235-241, 2017. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2017.p0235

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Mar. 01, 2024