Superconductive-assisted machining (SUAM) is a polishing method that employs a magnetic levitation tool, which is based on a superconductive phenomenon called the pinning effect. Since the tool magnetically levitates, the issue of tool interference is eliminated. In this study, in order to set up the polishing conditions of the magnetic levitation tool, we evaluated the relation between the flux density distribution relative to the tool position and the holding force acting on the magnetic levitation tool to maintain its initial position, set by field cooling by the superconducting bulk. For the holding force, we measured the attractive, repulsive, restoring, and driving forces. We found that the greater the holding force, the smaller the initial distance between the superconducting bulk and the magnetic levitation tool. The attractive force was found to peak when the levitated tool was displaced 6 mm from an initial position of 9 mm from the bulk, and it became only the self-weight of the magnetic levitation tool at displacements of 30 mm and above, where the pinning effect broke down. We then evaluated the polishing characteristics for SUS304 and A1100P at a tool displacement that results in the maximum attractive force. In the polishing experiment, we employed a water-based diamond slurry because the temperature of the workpiece was close to room temperature. We found that it was possible to polish SUS304 and A1100P while avoiding the effects of magnetization due to the polishing pressure or induced currents that accompany the rotation of the metal plate. The arithmetic average roughness, Ra, of A1100P was relatively high due to the effect of scratches, while that of SUS304 improved from 92 nm before polishing to 55 nm after polishing when polished with grains with a diameter of 1 μm.

1. [1] M. Sudo, “Advanced Control Technologies for 5-Axis Machining,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.1, No.2, pp. 108-112, 2007.
2. [2] L. Silva, H. Yoshioka, H. Shinno, and J. Zhu, “Tool Orientation Angle Optimization for a Multi-Axis Robotic Milling System,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.13, No.5, pp. 574-582, 2019.
3. [3] T. Suzuki, K. Yoshikawa, T. Hirogaki, E. Aoyama, and T. Ikegami, “Improved Method for Synchronizing Motion Accuracy of Linear and Rotary Axes Under Constant Feed Speed Vector at End Milling Point – Investigation of Motion Error Under NC-Commanded Motion –,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.13, No.5, pp. 679-690, 2019.
4. [4] T. Saiki, M. Tsutsumi, H. Suzuki, M. Kouya, and M. Ushio, “Development of Measurement for Motion Accuracy of 5 Axis NC Machine Tool,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.2, No.2, pp. 111-118, 2008.
5. [5] J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, “Theory of Superconductivity,” Physical Review, Vol.108, No.5, pp. 1175-1204, 1957.
6. [6] Y. Tanaka, K. Suzuki et al., “Study on polishing technology using magnetic levitation tools with superconductivity,” J. of the Japan Society for Abrasive Technology, Vol.62, No.4, pp. 219-220, 2018.
7. [7] A. I. Larkin and N. O. Yu, “Pinning in Type II Superconductors,” J. of Low Temperature Physics, Vol.34, Nos.3-4, pp. 409-428, 1979.
8. [8] Y. Miyato and H. Itozaki, “Investigation on readout coil design for fluxed locked loop control of HTS rf-SQUID,” J. of Physics: Conf. Series, Vol.871, 29th Int. Symp. on Superconductivity, 012078, 2016.
9. [9] H. Oda, J. Kawai, A. Usui et al., “Development of scanning SQUID microscope system and its applications on geological samples: A case study on marine ferromanganese crust,” J. of Physics: Conf. Series, Vol.1590, 32nd Int. Symp. on Superconductivity (ISS2019), 012037, 2019.
10. [10] F. N. Werfel et al., “Superconductor Bearings, Flywheels and Transportation,” Superconductor Science and Technology, Vol.25, No.1, 014007, 2012.
11. [11] M. Strasik et al., “An Overview of Boeing Flywheel Energy Storage Systems with High-Temperature Superconducting Bearings,” Superconductor Science and Technology, Vol.23, No.3, 034021, 2010.
12. [12] M. Strasik et al., “Design, Fabrication, and Test of a 5-kWh/100-kW Flywheel Energy Storage Utilizing a High-Temperature Superconducting Bearing,” IEEE Trans. on Applied Superconductivity, Vol.17, No.2, pp. 2133-2137, 2007.
13. [13] J. R. Hull, “Superconducting Bearings,” Superconductor Science and Technology, Vol.13, No.2, pp. R1-R15, 2000.
14. [14] Y. Arai, H. Seino, and K. Nagashima, “Levitation Properties of Superconducting Magnetic Bearings using Superconducting Coils and Bulk Superconductors,” Superconductor Science and Technology, Vol.23, No.11, 115011, 2010.
15. [15] J. Wang et al., “The First Man-Loading High Temperature Superconducting Maglev Test Vehicle in the World,” Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications, Vols.378-381, Part 1, pp. 809-814, 2002.
16. [16] L. Schultz et al., “Superconductively Levitated Transport System – the SupraTrans Project,” IEEE Trans. on Applied Superconductivity, Vol.15, No.2, pp. 2301-2305, 2005.
17. [17] M. Tinkham and C. J. Lobb, “Physical Properties of the New Superconductors,” Solid State Physics, Vol.42, pp. 91-134, 1989.
18. [18] H. B. Radousky, “A Review of the Superconducting and Normal State Properties of Y_1-xPr_xBa₂Cu₃O₇,” J. of Materials Research, Vol.7, No.7, pp. 1917-1955, 1992.
19. [19] M. K. Wu et al., “Superconductivity at 93 K in a New Mixed-Phase Yb-Ba-Cu-O Compound System at Ambient Pressure,” Physical Review Letters, Vol.58, No.9, pp. 908-910, 1987.
20. [20] D. He et al., “Spatial and temporal flux-trapping properties of bulk high temperature superconductors under static magnetization fields,” J. Supercond. Nov. Magn., Vol.28, pp. 2385-2391, 2015.
21. [21] N. Yamachi, T. Nishikawa, N. Sakai, K. Sawa, and M. Murakami, “Levitation forces of bulk superconductors in varying fields,” Physica C: Superconductivity, Vols.392-396, Part 1, pp. 579-584, 2003.
22. [22] Y. Hiramatsu et al., “Evaluation of Magnetic Cutting and Polishing with Superconducting Bulks,” J. of Physics: Conf. Series, Vol.871, 29th Int. Symp. on Superconductivity, 012048, 2017.