single-au.php

IJAT Vol.3 No.1 pp. 40-48
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2009.p0040
(2009)

Paper:

Design Methodology for Modularity Based on Life Cycle Scenario

Shinichi Fukushige, Yoichiro Inoue, Keita Tonoike, and Yasushi Umeda

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University
Yamada-oka 2-1, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan

Received:
October 21, 2008
Accepted:
December 18, 2008
Published:
January 5, 2009
Keywords:
life cycle design, modular design, life cycle scenario, geometric model
Abstract

Minimizing the environmental load and cost throughout the product life cycle requires appropriate life cycle design as well as product design. In life cycle design, we must determine the life cycle scenario at an early stage and design the product to realize this scenario. Modularity is a key to linking life cycle scenario to an appropriate product architecture because modular architecture increases performance in life cycle processes, such as disassembly, recycling, maintenance, reuse, and upgrading, by unifying components applicable to the same lifecycle scenario. We propose a method for determining modular structure based on life cycle scenario by evaluating the similarity among lifecycle-related components attributes. We also evaluate the modular structure’s geometric feasibility using an index indicates rigidity and compactness of the modules.

Cite this article as:
S. Fukushige, Y. Inoue, K. Tonoike, and Y. Umeda, “Design Methodology for Modularity Based on Life Cycle Scenario,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.3, No.1, pp. 40-48, 2009.
Data files:
References
    [1] Y. Umeda, A. Nonomura, and T. Tomiyama, "Study on Life-cycle Design for the Post Mass Production Paradigm," AIEDAM. Vol.14, No.2, pp. 149-161, 2000.
    [2] R. Suesada, Y. Itamochi, S. Kondoh, S. Fukushige, and Y. Umeda, "Development of Description Support System for Life Cycle Scenario," Advances in Life Cycle Engineering for Sustainable Manufactureing Businesses, Springer, pp. 29-34, 2007.
    [3] K. Ulrich and K. Tung, "Fundamentals of Product Modularity," Proceedings of 1991 ASME Design Technical Conferences -- Conferences on Design Manufacturing/Integration, pp. 1-14, 1991.
    [4] G. Seliger, S. Consiglio, D. Odry, and M. Zettl, "Development of Intelligent Modular Tools for Disassembly," Proceedings of 15th International CIRP Design Seminar 2005, pp. 182-187, 2005.
    [5] K. Aoyama, S. Takechi, and M. Iwamura, "Modular Design Supporting System with Management of Interface Information," Proceedings of EcoDesign 2001, A2-1, 2001.
    [6] J. Bryan, S. Ko, J. Hu, and Y. Koren, "Co-Evolution of Product Families and Assembly Systems," Annals of the CIRP, Vol.56, No.1, pp. 41-44, 2007.
    [7] M. V. Martin and K. Ishii, "Design for variety: developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures," Research in Engineering Design, Vol.13, No.4, pp. 213-235, 2002.
    [8] R. Stone, K. Wood, and R. Crawford, "A Heuristic Method to Identify Modules from a Functional Description of a Product," Proceedings of DETC98, DETC98/DTM-5642, 1998.
    [9] T. Pimmler and S. Eppinger, "Integration Analysis of Product Decompositions," Proceedings of the ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, DE-Vol.68, pp. 343-351, 1994.
    [10] F. Kimura, S. Kato, T. Hata, and T. Masuda, "Product Modularization for Parts Reuse in Inverse Manufacturing," Annals of the CIRP, Vol.50, No.1, pp. 89-92, 2001.
    [11] Ericsson and G. Erixon, "Controlling design variants: Modular product platform," ASME Press, 1999.
    [12] L. Alting and J. Jorgensen, "The Life Cycle Concept as a Basis or Sustainable Industrial Production," Annals of the CIRP, Vol.42, No.1, pp. 163-166, 1993.
    [13] M. Z. Hauschild, H. Wenzel, and L. Alting, "Life Cycle Design -- A Route to the Sustainable Industrial Culture --," Annals of the CIRP, Vol.48, No.1, pp. 93-96, 1999.
    [14] Y. Umeda, T. Daimon, and S. Kondoh, "Proposal of Decision Support Method for Life Cycle Strategy by Estimating Value and Physical Lifetimes -- Case Study --," Proceedings of EcoDesign 2005, pp. 606-613, 2005.
    [15]K. Qureshi and K. Saitou, "Design for Fixturability (DFF) Methodology for Commodity Parts: A Case Study with Connecting Rod Designs," Transactions of ASME, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineeing, Vol.2(1), pp. 21-27, 2002.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Dec. 05, 2019