TRAFST Vol.9 No.1 pp. 5-13


An Exploratory Study on the Learning Mechanism of Global Leadership Competencies

Caroline BENTON∗1, Hirohisa NAGAI∗2, Hiroe TSUBAKI∗3, and Yasunobu KINO∗2

∗1University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki

∗2University of Tsukuba, 3-29-1 Otsuka, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo

∗3The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 10-3 Midori-cho,Tachikawa-shi, Tokyo

20 January 2015
26 February 2015
April 15, 2015
global leadership competencies, meta-cognitive learning, double-loop learning, critical incidents

Leading international business requires the learning of global leadership competencies that allow managers to flexibly navigate across cultures. This explorative study investigates the mechanism by which global leadership competencies are acquired from a meta-cognitive approach. Indepth interviews and a web-survey were conducted in Asian and Europe. Results confirmed that 1) all managers faced new and difficult challenges during international business assignments, 2) the necessary leadership competencies were both common and idiosyncratic across cultures, and 3) global managers, regardless of their nationalities, experienced “double-loop learning” while acquiring new global leadership competencies though “breakthrough experiences” during international business assignments.

Cite this article as:
C. BENTON, H. NAGAI, H. TSUBAKI, and Y. KINO, “An Exploratory Study on the Learning Mechanism of Global Leadership Competencies,” , Vol.9, No.1, pp. 5-13, 2015.
Data files:
  1. [1] D. S. Ridley, P. A. Schultz, R. S. Glanz, and C. E. Weinstein: “Self-regulated learning: the interactive influences ofmetacognitive awareness and goals setting,” J. of ExperimentalEducation, Vol.60, pp. 293-306, 1992.
  2. [2] J. G. Borkowski, L. K. S. Chan, and N. Muthukrishna: “AProcess-oriented Model of Metacognition: Links betweenMotivation and Executive Functioning,” G. Schraw and J.Impara, (Ed.), Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition,pp. 1-41, Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press, 2000.
  3. [3] W. Winn and D. Snyder: “Cognitive perspectives in psychology,” D. H. Jonassen, (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, pp. 112-142, New York: Simon & Schuster MacMillan, 1996.
  4. [4] C. Argyris and D. A. Schön: “Organizational Learning:A Theory of Action Perspective,” Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1978.
  5. [5] C. Argyris and D. A. Schön: “Organizational Learning II:Theory, Method, and Practice,” Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1996.
  6. [6] C. Argyris: “Overcoming Organizational Defenses,” NeedhamHeights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1990.
  7. [7] C. C. Lundberg: “Planning the Executive Development Program,” California Management Review, Vol.15, No.1, pp. 1-15, Fall 1972.
  8. [8] R. E. Boyatzis: “Competencies in the 21st century,” J. of Management Development, Vol.27,Issue 1, pp. 5-12, 2008.
  9. [9] T. Jokinen: “Global leadership competencies: a review anddiscussion,” J. of European Industrial Training, Vol.29, Issue3, pp. 199-216, 2005.
  10. [10] H. Nagai: “Development of Future Asian Global Leaders:Vision, Framework, and Implications for APO Member
  11. Countries,” Asian Productivity Organization, 2008.
  12. [11] L. K. Woolsey: “The Critical Incident Technique: An InnovativeQualitative Method of Research,” Canadian J. ofCounseling, Vol.20, No.4, pp. 242-254, 1986.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Mar. 29, 2023