single-oh.php

TRAFST Vol.7 No.1 pp. 13-18

Opinion:

How the Notion of TRAFST Was Born?

Hidenori KIMURA

Center for Research and Development Strategy, Japan Science and Technology Agency, 7 Gobancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo

Received:
12 March 2013
Accepted:
13 March 2013
Published:
April 15, 2013
Keywords:
applied engineering, pure engineering, third scientific revolution, TRAFST, consilience
Abstract

As one of the initial proposers of the TRAFST (Transdisciplinary Federation of Science and Technology), I recall how the notion of the TRAFST was born and developed in the last decade. Some episodes are noted first that led to the establishment of the TRAFST. Fundamental notions that played important roles in my process of thinking are explained, that include “Applied engineering versus pure engineering,” “Third scientific revolution,” and “Science for design.”

Cite this article as:
H. KIMURA, “How the Notion of TRAFST Was Born?,” , Vol.7, No.1, pp. 13-18, 2013.
Data files:

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Mar. 29, 2023