single-rb.php

JRM Vol.38 No.1 pp. 135-141
(2026)

Paper:

Fostering Girls’ Interest in STEM Through a Practical Curriculum Integrating Manufacturing and Informatics Education: A Case Study in Japan

Mana Nishikawa and Kazuo Kawada ORCID Icon

Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University
1-1-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8524, Japan

Corresponding author

Received:
June 22, 2025
Accepted:
August 24, 2025
Published:
February 20, 2026
Keywords:
STEM education, elementary school students, informatics education, manufacturing-based learning, female students in science and engineering
Abstract

Gender disparity remains a persistent challenge in Japan’s science and engineering sectors, with women markedly underrepresented among students and researchers. National statistics and OECD data show that Japan has one of the lowest participation rates of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and careers among developed nations. This underrepresentation is partly attributed to the scarcity of role models in science and mathematics teaching positions, which can shape female students’ perceptions of their potential in these fields. This study addresses this issue by designing and implementing a practical curriculum that integrates manufacturing and informatics education. The curriculum was developed to cultivate interest in engineering and programming among the next generation of women STEM students through hands-on activities. This paper details the curriculum structure and its implementation process, as well as an analysis of its effectiveness using pre- and post-intervention data, examining students’ conceptual understanding and motivational changes. The results suggest that early, experience-based exposure to STEM concepts can positively influence women students’ interest and self-perception in science and engineering domains.

Cite this article as:
M. Nishikawa and K. Kawada, “Fostering Girls’ Interest in STEM Through a Practical Curriculum Integrating Manufacturing and Informatics Education: A Case Study in Japan,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.38 No.1, pp. 135-141, 2026.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, “White paper on gender equality 2022,” 2022 (in Japanese).
  2. [2] Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, “White paper on gender equality 2019,” 2019 (in Japanese).
  3. [3] Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, “White paper on gender equality 2024,” 2024 (in Japanese).
  4. [4] Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, “The fifth basic plan for gender equality,” 2020 (in Japanese).
  5. [5] Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, “The sixth science, technology, and innovation basic plan,” 2021 (in Japanese).
  6. [6] Y. Yamaguchi, “Japan’s policies to promote the increase of female scientists: Focusing on the measures regarding science career choices of female junior and senior high school students,” Co* Design Note, Vol.2, pp. 1-28, 2023 (in Japanese).
  7. [7] P. Lockwood and Z. Kunda, “Superstars and me: predicting the impact of role models on the self,” J. of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.73, No.1, pp. 91-103, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.91
  8. [8] S. Imai, Y. Ueno, and K. Kajihara, “Implement a program with contents of measurement and control for elementary school science classes,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.31, No.3, pp. 434-440, 2019. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2019.p0434
  9. [9] Y. Ohnishi, K. Honda, R. Nishioka, S. Mori, and K. Kawada, “Robotics programming learning for elementary and junior high school students,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.29, No.6, pp. 992-998, 2017. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2017.p0992
  10. [10] K. Kawada, M. Nagamatsu, and T. Yamamoto, “An approach to rescue robot workshops for kindergarten and primary school children,” J. Robot. Mechatron., Vol.25, No.3, pp. 521-528, 2013. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2013.p0521
  11. [11] D. Cvencek, A. N. Meltzoff, and A. G. Greenwald, “Math-gender stereotypes in elementary school children,” Child Development, Vol.82, No.3, pp. 766-779, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.x
  12. [12] D. M. Marx and J. S. Roman, “Female role models: protecting women’s math test performance,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol.28, No.9, pp. 1183-1193, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022812004
  13. [13] B. Bevan, M. Petrich, and K. Wilkinson, “Tinkering is serious play,” Educational Leadership, Vol.72, No.4, pp. 28-33, 2015.
  14. [14] M. Resnick and E. Rosenbaum, “Designing for tinkerability,” L. A. Buechley, Y. B. Kafai, M. Resnick, and K. A. Peppler (Eds.), “Design, make, play: Creative learning in a digital age,” Routledge, pp. 163-181, 2013.
  15. [15] C. Good, J. Aronson, and M. Inzlicht, “Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat,” J. of Applied Developmental Psychology, Vol.24, No.6, pp. 645-662, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2003.09.002
  16. [16] T. Bell, J. Alexander, I. Freeman, and M. Grimley, “Computer science unplugged: School students doing real computing without computers,” The New Zealand J. of Applied Computing and Information Technology, Vol.13, No.1, pp. 20-29, 2009.
  17. [17] C. Okano, “Study on the impression of shapes,” Research Bulletin of Kyushu Junior College of Kinki University, No.49, pp. 75-84, 2019 (in Japanese).

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on Feb. 19, 2026