To realize Society 5.0—a vision of a highly integrated society that combines cyberspace and physical space—the Japanese government emphasizes the development of future human resources, particularly by encouraging female junior high school students to pursue careers in science and technology. The “Girls in Control” (GIC) workshop, organized by the International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC) and the Automatic Control Council, introduces the fundamentals of control engineering to girls aged 10–15 y through interactive activities. While earlier GICs focused on simulations using Scratch, cyber-only approaches have limitations in promoting deeper understanding and practical skills. This study presents the development and implementation of a new hybrid learning experience introduced at the 9th GIC workshop in Japan. Specifically, hands-on water level control experiments were incorporated to complement simulation-based learning and enhance students’ sensory perception and implementation abilities. The workshop content was designed in alignment with the Japanese Courses of Study for junior high school technology education, particularly in the area of measurement and control using sensors, computers, and actuators. Preliminary observations indicated that integrating physical and cyber learning increased student engagement, improved conceptual understanding, and positively influenced interest in STEM fields. This approach holds promise for fostering scientific curiosity and supporting gender-inclusive talent development in the context of Society 5.0.

1. [1] Council for Science, Technology and Innovation, Cabinet Office, “Policy package for education and human resource development for the realization of society 5.0,” 2022 (in Japanese).
2. [2] S. Imai, “Proposal of control education curriculum in university of education,” IEEJ Trans. on Electronics, Information and Systems, Vol.139, No.4, pp. 350-355, 2019 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.1541/ieejeiss.139.350
3. [3] R. Tsushima, Y. Mitani, and K. Takeuchi, “Manufacturing Method of A Simple Law-Cost Experimental Arrangement for Magnetic Levitation System Using PID Control,” Proc. of the General Meeting of the Tokai Branch of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol.57, pp. 375-376, 2008 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmetokai.2008.57.375
4. [4] S. Ishibashi, “Start-up education of control technology in universities,” Proc. of the Joint Conf. on Automatic Control, The 64th Joint Conf. on Automatic Control, pp. 928-932, 2021 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11511/jacc.64.0_928
5. [5] S. Ushida, “Robotics Approach to a Fundamental Education for Control Engineering,” Measurement and Control, Vol.54, No.3, pp. 165-170, 2015 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11499/sicejl.54.165
6. [6] J. S. Eccles and A. Wigfield, “Motivational beliefs, values, and goals,” Annual Review of Psychology, Vol.53, pp. 109-132, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
7. [7] Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, “The course of study commentary for junior high schools: Technology and home economics,” Kairyudo, 2008 (in Japanese).
8. [8] Kairyudo, “Technology and home economics, technology field: Placing hope in technology,” 2022 (in Japanese).
9. [9] Tokyo Shoseki, “New technology and home economics, technology field: Technology to create the future,” 2022 (in Japanese).
10. [10] Kyoiku Tosho, “New technology and home economics, technology field: Creating tomorrow,” 2020 (in Japanese).
11. [11] K. L. Chien, J. A. Hrones, and J. B. Reswick, “On the automatic control of generalized passive systems,” Trans. of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol.74, No.2, pp. 175-183, 1952. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4015724
12. [12] M. Banzi, “Getting started with arduino,” O’Reilly Media, 2008.
13. [13] J. G. Ziegler and N. B. Nichols, “Optimum settings for automatic controllers,” Trans. of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol.64, No.8, pp. 759-765, 1942. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4019264
14. [14] M. Margolis, “Arduino cookbook,” O’Reilly Media, 2011.
15. [15] I. Maruta, “Wheeled Inverted Pendulum for Education Using Arduino and LEGO Parts,” Measurement and Control, Vol.54, No.3, pp. 196-199, 2015 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11499/sicejl.54.196
16. [16] T. Asai and M. Hirata, “Teaching Materials for Control Education—Proposals from Both Theoretical and Experimental Aspects,” Measurement and Control, Vol.54, No.3, pp. 147-151, 2015 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11499/sicejl.54.147
17. [17] P. L. dos Santos and T.-P. Azevedo Perdicoúlis, “Arduino in automatic control education: RC circuit step response analysis,” IFAC PapersOnLine, Vol.58, No.26, pp. 31-36, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.10.266
18. [18] R. Kawatani, “Learning classical control with ‘Maxima’ and ‘Scilab’,” Kogakusha, 2014 (in Japanese).
19. [19] K. Tada, “Learning modern control with ‘Scilab’ & ‘Xcos’,” Kogakusha, 2016 (in Japanese).
20. [20] Y. Ohyama, H. Hashimoto, H. Kobayashi, and C. Ishii, “Case studies on system control education using Scilab/Xcos,” Proc. of the Joint Conf. on Automatic Control, The 53rd Joint Conf. on Automatic Control, pp. 220-223, 2010 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11511/jacc.53.0.114.0
21. [21] Y. Sawaguchi, M. Okamoto, T. Ohashi, and M. Tokita, “A laboratory Course for DC Motor Control using Scilab/Scicos,” Proc. of the Joint Conf. on Automatic Control, The 52rd Joint Conf. on Automatic Control, 2009 (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.11511/jacc.52.0.228.0