The purpose of this study is to understand the fluidity of survivors’ narratives and to clarify the changes such narratives undergo after time has elapsed. Nineteen survivors of the landslide disaster that occurred on August 20, 2014 in Hiroshima City were interviewed twice-three years after the disaster and five years after the disaster-and the changes in the content of their narratives were analyzed. In addition, by analyzing the titles of newspaper articles that were published within one month of the disaster, the characteristics of narrative transformation were quantitatively identified. The narratives of disaster victims that were once accepted as “dominant stories” become “personalized” as “alternative stories” with the elapse of time, even though they are told by the same person. Comparisons of two interviews conducted at different times show that the word “evacuation” undergoes a significant change in context over time elapse, while the word “disaster” appears in a new context in the fifth-year interview. While social or community groups are the bearers of “socialized” memories, individuals are the bearers of “personalized” memories which are expected to continue to change as time elapses. It is necessary to examine what should be shared in order to utilize disaster victims’ memories to prevent and mitigate disasters, and how to such memories should be shared.

1. [1] M. Okamura, “Characteristic changes and problems in media disaster reporting in the Great East Japan Earthquake,” Reference, Vol.61, No.9, pp. 51-65, 2011 (in Japanese).
2. [2] A. Hikita, A. Watanabe, and T. Fukuda, “Modeling of Deep Emotion (KANDO) for Improvement of Experience Value,” Proc. of the 21th Annual Meeting of Japan Society of Kansei Engineering, pp. 720-724, 2019 (in Japanese).
3. [3] Cabinet Office (in Charge of Disaster Prevention), “Outline of Hiroshima City sediment-related disaster that occurred on August 20,” 2014 (in Japanese).
4. [4] Japanese Geotechnical Society, “August 2014 Hiroshima Heavy Rain Disaster Survey Report,” 2015 (in Japanese).
5. [5] M. Kaibori, Y. Ishikawa, Y. Satofuka, K. Matsumura, K. Nakatani, Y. Hasegawa, N. Matsumoto, T. Takahara, K. Fukutsuka, K. Yoshino, E. Nagano, M. Fukuda, Y. Nakano, T. Shimada, D. Hori, and T. Nishikawa, “Sediment-related disasters induced by a heavy rainfall in Hiroshima-city on 20th August,” J. of Japan Society of Erosion Control, Vol.67, No.4, pp. 49-59, 2014 (in Japanese).
6. [6] H. Yamamoto and H. Kobayashi, “Characteristics of Heavy Rainfall and Debris Flow Disaster in Hiroshima City by Akisame-front, 20 August 2014,” Natural Disaster Science, Vol.33, No.3, pp. 293-312, 2014 (in Japanese with English abstract).
7. [7] M. Isoda, “Reread Japanese History from Natural Disasters: Disaster Prevention Learned from Ancestors,” Chuokoron-Shinsha, Inc., 2014 (in Japanese).
8. [8] K. Koyama, Y. Kumahara, and S. Fujimoto, “The Characteristics of the Stone Monuments Related to Flood and Debris Flow Disasters and Their Significance for Disaster Prevention in Hiroshima Prefecture, Western Japan,” Geographical Sciences, Vol.72, No.1, pp. 1-18, 2017 (in Japanese with English abstract).
9. [9] Y. Kumahara, Y. Hirotane, K. Koyama, and Y. Iwasa, “Additional data on the stone monuments related to flood and debris flow disasters in Hiroshima Prefecture, southwest Japan, and the historical transition of those monuments,” Bulletin of the Hiroshima University Museum, No.9, pp. 81-94, 2017 (in Japanese with English abstract).
10. [10] H. Fukada, “Persuasion and Attitude Change: The Study of Fear Communication,” Kitaoji Shobo, 1998 (in Japanese).
11. [11] M. Halbwachs, “La mémoire collective,” AlbinMichel, 1950.
12. [12] M. Halbwachs, “Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire,” AlbinMichel, 1925.
13. [13] H. Hama, “Introduction: Sociology of memory,” Philosophy, No.117, pp. 1-11, 2007 (in Japanese with English abstract).
14. [14] M. Terada, “Natural Disasters and Narratives: A Methodological Study of Representation of the Sanriku Tsunami in 1933,” Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History, Vol.123, pp. 451-473, 2005 (in Japanese).
15. [15] Y. Noguchi, “Care as a Narrative: Narrative Approach,” Igaku-Shoin, 2012 (in Japanese).
16. [16] M. White and D. Epston, “Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends,” W. W. Norton & Co., Inc., 1990.
17. [17] T. Atsumi, “Group Dynamics of Narrative: Unnarrated Narratives of Experiences,” Bulletin of Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Vol.30, pp. 160-173, 2004 (in Japanese with English abstract).
18. [18] N. Takano and T. Atsumi, “An Examination of the dialogue with the narrators and audiences of The Great Hanshin- Awaji Earthquake: From several cases of the rips of the narrators’ talks and audiences,” The Japanese J. of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.46, No.2, pp. 185-197, 2007 (in Japanese with English abstract).
19. [19] K. Arisue, “The collective memory and the personal memory,” J. of Law, Politics, and Sociology, Vol.89, No.2, pp. 19-40, 2016 (in Japanese).
20. [20] M. Oka, “Memory/Narrative,” Iwanami-Shoten, 2000 (in Japanese).
21. [21] M. Sekizawa, “Memories and narratives of ‘war and death’: their personal and social impacts,” Bulletin of the National Museum of Japanese History, Vol.147, pp. 7-34, 2008 (in Japanese and English abstract).
22. [22] K. Yamori, “Human Science for Disaster Reduction,” University of Tokyo Press, 2009 (in Japanese).
23. [23] Y. Yamada, “Narrative about Loss: Life History Generation,” Shin-Yo-Sha, 2007 (in Japanese).