JDR Vol.13 No.3 pp. 547-558
doi: 10.20965/jdr.2018.p0547


Response of the Tourism Industry to Volcanic Hazard Information: A Case Study of the Volcanic Warning at Zao Volcano in 2015

Miwa Kuri*,†, Amy Donovan**, Anawat Suppasri*, and Tetsuya Torayashiki*

*International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University
6-6-11 Aza-Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan

Corresponding author

**Geography and Environmental Hazards, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom

March 12, 2017
March 27, 2018
June 1, 2018
volcanic information, information receiver, actor in disaster prevention, tourism

In recent years, the role of tourism-related workers in regional volcanic disaster prevention has increased in Japan. The coexistence of tourism with disaster mitigation is important in keeping residents and visitors safe and in protecting livelihoods. This paper analyzes responses from tourists and tourism workers on their receipt of volcanic hazard information. Awareness of this hazard is developing in the tourism industry. Information of expert such as members of the JMA and volcanologists at universities and institutes were considered more reliable sources of information than others. However, a direct access to experts’ information was not considered easy. Respondents’ recognition of the past hazards of Zao Volcano and future hazard factors were almost accurate. Some tourism-related workers hoped to obtain volcanic hazard information from the experts to provide to their customers. Many respondents had excessive expectations for predicting an eruption. A few were able to accept the uncertainties associated with volcano warnings and status reports. Experts need to provide adequate explanations of scientific evidence and the associated scientific uncertainties before society can readily accept eruption warnings. Furthermore, in an emergency, it is necessary to make available accurate information from specialized agencies and experts, and promptly provide them to tourism companies.

Cite this article as:
M. Kuri, A. Donovan, A. Suppasri, and T. Torayashiki, “Response of the Tourism Industry to Volcanic Hazard Information: A Case Study of the Volcanic Warning at Zao Volcano in 2015,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.13 No.3, pp. 547-558, 2018.
Data files:
  1. [1] M. Ban, T. Oikawa, and S. Yamasaki, “Geological map of Zao volcano,” Geological survey of Japan, AIST, 2016.
  2. [2] Japan Meteorological Agency, “Activities of each volcano,” [accessed February 10, 2017]
  3. [3] M. Kuri, “Science Communication of Hazards with Scientific Uncertainty: in the Cases of Volcanic Activity,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.11, No.4, pp. 707-719, 2016.
  4. [4] H. Okada and T. Ui, “Eruption prediction and disaster prevention and mitigation,”, T. Ui ed., Volcanic eruption and disaster, Tokyo university Press, pp. 79-116, 1997 (in Japanese).
  5. [5] O. Hiroi, H. Nakamori, N. Kawabata, and Y. Goto, “Prediction and coverage of the volcano eruption: The case study of eruptions 1986 Izu-Oshima eruption in 1986 and the Unzen in 1991,” Institute of Socio-Information and Communication Studies, the University of Tokyo, p. 153, 1992.
  6. [6] M. Koyama, “Public Communication and Education of Knowledge and Information about Volcanoes and Their Risk in Japan: Present Status,” Bulletin of the Volcanological Society of Japan, pp. S289-S317, 2005.
  7. [7] Y. Nakamura, S. Aramaki, and E. Fujita, “Japan’s Volcanic Disaster Mitigation Initiatives: Activities of the Commission on Mitigation of Volcanic Disasters, the Volcanological Society of Japan,” Technical report of National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, No.380, pp. 165-172. 2013.
  8. [8] Japan Meteorological Agency, “Improvement of Volcanic Information for Mountaineers,” [accessed February 10, 2017]
  9. [9] Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, “the Act on Special Measures for Active Volcanoes,” 2015, [accessed February 10, 2017]
  10. [10] Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, “Volcano disaster prevention countermeasure meeting for volcanic information etc.,” 2008, [accessed February 10, 2017]
  11. [11] M. Kuri, I. Miyahara, M. Watanabe, S. Sato, and K. Nakagawa, “Report of “Geopark on Stricken Areas: Disasters and Gifts of Geo,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.11. No.3, pp. 425-436, 2016.
  12. [12] S. Sato, K. Hanaoka, M. Okumura, and S. Koshimura, “Grasp of Disaster Situation and Support Need inside Affected Area with Social Sensing – An Analysis of Twitter Data before and after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster Occurring –,” J. Disaster Res., Vol.11, No.2, pp. 198-206, 2016.
  13. [13] Japan Meteorological Agency, “About Eruption Notice,” [accessed February 10, 2017]

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera.

Last updated on May. 28, 2024