single-jc.php

JACIII Vol.23 No.1 pp. 84-90
doi: 10.20965/jaciii.2019.p0084
(2019)

Paper:

Optimization of Orthogonal MSK Waveforms for Active Sonar Using Genetic Algorithm

Dali Liu*1,*2, Lei Li*3, and Xinhong Chen*4

*1School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Tianjin Polytechnic University
No.399, BinShui West Road, XiQing District, Tianjin 300387, China

*2State Key Laboratory of Acoustics, Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
No. 21, North 4th Ring Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China

*3Physical Engineering School, Zhengzhou University
No.100 Science Avenue, Zhengzhou City, Henan 450001, China

*4Tianjin Railway Technical and Vocational College
No.21 Jianchang Road, Hebei District, Tianjin 300240, China

Received:
April 27, 2018
Accepted:
June 11, 2018
Published:
January 20, 2019
Keywords:
active sonar, constant envelope, MSK, genetic algorithm, orthogonal waveforms
Abstract
Optimization of Orthogonal MSK Waveforms for Active Sonar Using Genetic Algorithm

The correlations of the MSK waveforms

In order to solve the high peak to average power ratio (PAPR) problem of pseudo random code phase modulation (PRCPM) signals, minimum shift keying (MSK) modulation waveforms with constant envelope were introduced into underwater detection. Genetic algorithm (GA) was proposed to optimize pseudo random binary codes used for MSK waveforms, in order to design sonar waveforms with various performances. After MSK complex envelope signal was obtained by theoretical analysis, the optimizing objective functions for a single waveform and a group of waveforms were presented. The optimized single waveform with low autocorrelation sidelobe values can reduce false alarm number and the difficulty of target decision. When multiple sonar systems work as a team, the optimized group of orthogonal waveforms with low autocorrelation sidelobe values and cross-correlation values can alleviate interferences between each other. In the simulation, the correlation performances of a single waveform and a group of orthogonal waveforms were presented, and ambiguity function showed that the designed waveforms had good velocity and distance resolution, which means that the optimized MSK waveforms are suitable for underwater detection.

Cite this article as:
D. Liu, L. Li, and X. Chen, “Optimization of Orthogonal MSK Waveforms for Active Sonar Using Genetic Algorithm,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.23, No.1, pp. 84-90, 2019.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] P. M. Baggenstoss, “Specular decomposition of active sonar returns using combined waveforms,” IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol.49, No.4, pp. 2509-2521, 2013.
  2. [2] D. A. Hague and J. R. Buck, “A generalized sinusoidal frequency modulated waveform for active sonar,” IEEE J. of Oceanic Engineering, Vol.42, No.1, pp. 109-123, 2017.
  3. [3] S. P. Pecknold et al., “Improved active sonar performance using Costas waveforms,” IEEE J. of Oceanic Engineering, Vol.34, No.4, pp. 559-574, 2009.
  4. [4] H. Deng, “Synthesis of binary sequences with good autocorrelation and crosscorrelation properties by simulated annealing,” IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol.32, No.1, pp. 98-107, 1996.
  5. [5] H. Deng, “Polyphase code design for orthogonal netted radar systems,” IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, Vol.52, No.11, pp. 3126-3135, 2004.
  6. [6] H. A. Khan et al.,“Optimizing Polyphase Sequences for Orthogonal Netted Radar,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Vol.13, No.10, pp. 589-592, 2006.
  7. [7] S. P. Singh and K. S. Rao, “Polyphase Radar signal Design Using Modified Simulated Annealing Algorithm,” IETE J. of Research, Vol.53, No.2, pp. 173-182, 2007.
  8. [8] H. Hu and B. Liu, “Genetic Algorithm for Designing Polyphase Orthogonal Code,” Int. Conf. on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM ’08), IEEE Press, pp. 1-4, 2008.
  9. [9] J. B. Yan et al, “Optimization of polyphase codes based on weighted cyclic algorithm for synthetic aperture radar,” IET Int. Radar Conf. 2015, IET Press, pp. 14-16, 2015.
  10. [10] Z. Dunn et al., “Low Sidelobe Pseudo-Orthogonal Code Sets Through Particle Swarm Optimization,” IEEE Radar Conf. 2016, IEEE Press, pp. 2-6, 2016.
  11. [11] W.-Z. Dai and K. Xia, “Approach to Hybrid Flow-Shop Scheduling Problem Based on Self-Guided Genetic Algorithm,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.19, No.3, pp. 365-371, 2015.
  12. [12] K. Uemura and I. Ono, “AEGA: A New Real-Coded Genetic Algorithm Taking Account of Extrapolation,” J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Inform., Vol.20, No.3, pp. 429-437, 2016.
  13. [13] Z. Liu et al., “Communication analysis of integrated waveform based on LFM and MSK,” IET Int. Radar Conf. 2015, IET Press, pp. 1-5, 2015.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Dec. 05, 2019