Electroporation using microstructured electrodes, which generate a localized high electric field, allows molecules (genes) to be introduced into cells; however, there are some technical issues with the fabrication process and material in terms of cytotoxicity and cost. In this study, polypyrrole (PPy), a biocompatible and conductive polymer, is nano- and micro-structured for an electrode of electroporation by electrochemical polymerization. Nano- and micro-scale dots of PPy are generated by a specific pulse waveform of applied voltage in a considerably low concentration of pyrrole (monomer) solution. The conductivity of PPy is changed from 4 to 16 S/cm by dopant concentration with a range of 0.025 M to 0.2 M. It is demonstrated that electroporation using the PPy and ITO electrodes introduce test agent of molecules (Propidium Iodide) into HeLa cells, where 10 and 50 V of pulse voltage is applied. The electroporation using nano-scale dots of PPy electrodes provides a 40% higher introduction rate than that of the micro-dots of PPy electrodes. The introduction rate in electroporation using the nano-scale dots of PPy can be maintained above 95% regardless of the application time of voltage, whereas that of the micro-scale dots of PPy electrodes increases with the application time. It is reasonable to assume that the nano- and micro-structured PPy electrodes are effective in electroporation, as the introduction rates on these PPy electrodes are higher than that of the ITO electrode. However, the cell viability in the electroporation using the nano-scale of PPy electrodes decreases by approximately 30% with application time. Both the introduction rate and cell viability slightly decrease with the conductivity of the PPy electrode; therefore, they are dominated by surface morphologies of the PPy electrode and applied voltage as compared to that of electrode conductivity. Nevertheless, it is demonstrated that the nano- and micro-structured PPy electrodes improve the efficiency of electroporation owing to the locally concentrated electric field.

1. [1] Y. Yoshida and S. Yamanaka, “iPS cells: A source of cardiac regeneration,” J. of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, Vol.50, No.2, pp. 327-332, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.10.026
2. [2] I. K. McNiece, K. K. Wacker, J. Kurtzberg, and P. I. Warkentin, “Standardization, workforce development and advocacy in cell and gene therapies: a summary of the 2020 Regenerative Medicine InterCHANGE,” Cytotherapy, Vol.23, No.10, pp. 886-893, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2021.02.004
3. [3] S. Taghavi, K. Abnous, S. M. Taghdisi, M. Ramezani, and M. Alinolandi, “Hybrid carbon-based materials for gene delivery in cancer therapy,” J. of Controlled Release, Vol.318, pp. 158-175, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.12.030
4. [4] C. Y. Kok, I. Alexander, L. Lisowski, and E. Kizana, “Adeno-Associated Virus Gene Therapy: Translational Progress and Future Prospects in the Treatment of Heart Failure,” Heart, Lung and Circulation, Vol.27, No.11, pp. 1285-1300, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2018.03.005
5. [5] T. B. Napotnik, T. Polajžer, and D. Miklavčič, “Cell death due to electroporation – A review,” Bioelectrochemistry, Vol.141, 107871, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2021.107871
6. [6] B. Duckert, S. Vinkx, D. Braeken, and M. Fauvart, “Single-cell transfection technologies for cell therapies and gene editing,” J. of Controlled Release, Vol.330, No.10, pp. 963-975, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.068
7. [7] I. Tsoneva, S. Semkova, R. Bakalova, Z. Zhelev, P. Nuss, G. Staneva, and B. Nikolova, “Electroporation, electrochemotherapy and electro-assisted drug delivery in cancer. A state-of-the-art review,” Biophysical Chemistry, Vol.286, 106819, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2022.106819
8. [8] E. B. Ghartey-Tagoe, B. A. Babbin, A. Nusrat, A. S. Neish, and M. R. Prausnitz, “Plasmid DNA and siRNA transfection of intestinal epithelial monolayers by electroporation,” Int. J. of Pharmaceutics, Vol.315, Nos.1-2, pp. 122-133, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.02.022
9. [9] M. Scuderi, J. Dermol-Černe, C. A. da Silva, A. Muralidharan, P. E. Boukany, and L. Rems, “Models of electroporation and the associated transmembrane molecular transport should be revisited,” Bioelectrochemistry, Vol.147, 108216, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2022.108216
10. [10] H. He, D. C. Chang, and Y.-K. Lee, “Using a micro electroporation chip to determine the optimal physical parameters in the uptake of biomolecules in HeLa cells,” Bioelectrochemistry, Vol.70, No.2, pp. 363-368, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2006.05.008
11. [11] K. Riaz, S.-F. Leung, Z. Fan, and Y.-K. Lee, “Electric field enhanced 3D scalable low-voltage nano-spike electroporation system,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Vol.255, No.1, pp. 10-20, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2016.12.022
12. [12] X. Zhang, N. Hu, X. Chen, T. Fan, Z. Wang, X. Zheng, J. Yang, and S. Qian, “Controllable cell electroporation using microcavity electrodes,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, Vol.240, pp. 434-442, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.08.172
13. [13] X. Zhao, Izhar, X. Wang, H. Tavakkoli, H. Liu, B. Tang, and Y.-K. Lee, “A smartphone-based electroporation system with highly robust and low-voltage silicon nanopillar chips,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Vol.197, No.1, 113776, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113776
14. [14] G. Saulis, R. Rodaitė-Riševičienė, and R. Saulė, “Cytotoxicity of a Cell Culture Medium Treated with a High-Voltage Pulse Using Stainless Steel Electrodes and the Role of Iron Ions,” Membranes (Basel), Vol.12, No.2, 184, 2022.https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12020184
15. [15] A. Vižintin, S. Marković, J. Ščančar, and D. Miklavčič, “Electroporation with nanosecond pulses and bleomycin or cisplatin results in efficient cell kill and low metal release from electrodes,” Bioelectrochemistry, Vol.140, 107798, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2021.107798
16. [16] A. V. Thakur and B. J. Lokhande, “Effect of the molar concentration of pyrrole monomer on the rate of polymerization, growth and hence the electrochemical behavior of highly pristine PPy flexible electrodes,” Heliyon, Vol.5, No.11, E02909, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02909
17. [17] J. Duchet, R. Legras, and S. Demoustier-Champagne, “Chemical synthesis of polypyrrole: structure–properties relationship,” Synthetic Metals, Vol.98, No.2, pp. 113-122, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-6779(98)00180-5
18. [18] S. Amaki, Y. Kato, T. Sudo, and A. Kaneko, “Effects of surface morphology and conductivity of poly-pyrrole electrode on electroporation,” Proc. the 19th Int. Conf. on Precision Engineering (ICPE 2022 in Nara), 2022.
19. [19] S. M. Abu-Sari, M. F. A. Patah, B. C. Ang, and W. M. A. W. Daud, “A review of polymerization fundamentals, modification method, and challenges of using PPy-based photocatalyst on perspective application,” J. of Environmental Chemical Engineering, Vol.10, No.6, 108725, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.108725
20. [20] C. Yu, X. Zhu, C. Wang, Y. Zhou, X. Jia, L. Jiang, X. Liu, and G. G. Wallace, “A smart cyto-compatible asymmetric polypyrrole membrane for salinity power generation,” Nano Energy, Vol.53, pp. 475-482, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.073
21. [21] K. Kawaguchi, Y. Fujita, K. Kato, and A. Kaneko, “Fabrication of Poly-pyrrole Membrane Actuator for Cell Stimulation,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.14, No.2, pp. 167-174, 2020. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2020.p0167
22. [22] Y. Kato, S. Serizawa, and A. Kaneko, “Fabrication of Nanostructured Poly-pyrrole as a Scaffold of Cultured Cell,” Proc. the 8th Int. Conf. of Asian Society for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology, 2019.
23. [23] T. Sugihara, A. Kaneko, I. Takeda, and R. Inoue, “Fabrication of cell stimulation device utiling a conducting polymer and a hydrogel,” Proc. JSPE Spring Meeting, 2014.