single-au.php

IJAT Vol.4 No.3 pp. 303-311
doi: 10.20965/ijat.2010.p0303
(2010)

Paper:

Interactive Design-Assistance System of Machine Tool Structure in Conceptual and Fundamental Design Stage

Zhangyong Yu, Keiichi Nakamoto, Tohru Ishida, and Yoshimi Takeuchi

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, 2-1 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan

Received:
December 1, 2009
Accepted:
February 4, 2010
Published:
May 5, 2010
Keywords:
interactive design-assistance system, machine tool structure, conceptual and fundamental design, beam theory, static/dynamic/thermal stiffness
Abstract

This paper presents the development of an interactive design-assistance system for quickly determining a machine tool structure in conceptual and fundamental design stage. The distinguishing point in this system is that all components of one machine tool structure are approximated into conceptual beams. Therefore, by using the interactive design-assistance system, designers can decide a beam structure in a short time because classical beam theory makes it easy to analyze the static, dynamic and thermal stiffness. Converting the beam structure to an actual structure, designers can complete the conceptual and fundamental design of a machine tool structure. Consequently, the interactive design-assistance system enables designers to complete structural design of a machine tool in a shorter time with higher efficiency.

Cite this article as:
Z. Yu, K. Nakamoto, T. Ishida, and Y. Takeuchi, “Interactive Design-Assistance System of Machine Tool Structure in Conceptual and Fundamental Design Stage,” Int. J. Automation Technol., Vol.4, No.3, pp. 303-311, 2010.
Data files:
References
  1. [1] M. G. Mehrabi, A. G. Ulsoy, and Y. Koren, “Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems: Key to Future Manufacturing,” J. of Manufacturing, Vol.11, pp. 403-419, 2000.
  2. [2] G. Bianchi, F. Paolucci, P. V. Braembusshe, H. V. Brussel, and F. Jovane, “Towards Virtual Engineering in Machine Tool Design,” Annals of the CIRP, Vol.45, No.1, pp. 381-384, 1996.
  3. [3] Y. Altintas, C. Brecher, M, Weck, and S. Witt, “Virtual Machine Tool,” Annals of the CIRP, Vol.54, No.2, pp. 115-128, 2005.
  4. [4] M. Zatarain, E. Lejardi, F. Egana, and R. Bueno, “Modular Synthesis of Machine Tools,” Annals of the CIRP, Vol.47, No.1, pp. 333-336, 1998.
  5. [5] B. S. Homann and A. C. Thornton, “Precision Machine Design Assistant: A constraint-based Tool for the Design and Evaluation of Precision Machine Tool Concepts,” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol.12, pp. 419-429, 1998.
  6. [6] Y. Ito and H. Shinno, “Structural Description of Machine Tools (1st report),” J. of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol.46, No.405, pp. 562-571, 1980. (in Japanese)
  7. [7] H. Shinno and Y. Ito, “Structural Description ofMachine Tools (2nd report),” J. of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol.46, No.405, pp. 572-579, 1980. (in Japanese)
  8. [8] H. Shinno and Y. Ito, “Structural Description of Machine Tools (3rd report),” J. of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol.48, No.425, pp. 124-130, 1981. (in Japanese)
  9. [9] H. Shinno and Y. Ito, “Generating Method for Structural Configuration ofMachine Tools (1st report, Method of Variant Design Type),” J. of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol.50, No.449, pp. 213-221, 1984. (in Japanese)
  10. [10] H. Shinno and Y. Ito, “Generating Method for Structural Configuration of Machine Tools (2nd report, Free Design Method),” J. of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol.50, No.459, pp. 2192-2200, 1984. (in Japanese)
  11. [11] H. Shinno and Y. Ito, “Generating Method for Structural Configuration of Machine tools (3rd report, Variant Design Using Directed Graph),” J. of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol.52, No.474, pp. 788-793, 1986. (in Japanese)
  12. [12] Y. Ito and H. Shinno, “Structural Description and Similarity Evaluation of The Structural Configuration in Machine Tools,” Int. J. of Machine Tool Design and Research, Vol.22, pp. 97-110, 1982.
  13. [13] A. C. Okafor and Y. M. Ertekin, “Derivation of Machine Tool Error Models and Error Compensation Procedure for Three Axes Vertical Machining Center using Rigid Body Kinematics,” Int. J. ofMachine tools & manufacture, Vol.40, pp. 1199-1213, 2000.

*This site is desgined based on HTML5 and CSS3 for modern browsers, e.g. Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, IE9,10,11, Opera.

Last updated on Dec. 05, 2019