Paper:
Language: English:

Anthropomorphization Framework for Human-Object Communication

Hirotaka Osawa^, Jun Mukai^, and Michita Imai^**

^*Graduate School of Science and Technology, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-Ku, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan
^**Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-Ku, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan

Received: March 27, 2007

Accepted: August 10, 2007

Keywords: anthropomorphization, human-agent interaction

Journal ref: Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, Vol.11, No.8 pp. 1007-1014, 2007

Abstract

We propose an anthropomorphization framework that determines an object’s body image. This framework directly intervenes and anthropomorphizes objects in ubiquitous-computing environments through robotic body parts shaped like those of human beings, which provide information through spoken directions and body language. Our purpose is to demonstrate that an object acquires subjective representations through anthropomorphization. Using this framework, people can more fully understand instructions given by an object. We designed an anthropomorphization framework that changes the body image by attaching body parts. We also conducted experiments to evaluate this framework. Results indicate that the site at which an anthropomorphization device is attached influences human perception of the object’s virtual body image, and participants in experiments understood several instructions given by the object more clearly. Results also indicate that participants better intuited their devices’ instructions and movement in ubiquitous-computing environments.

Reference

[1] M. Bateson, D. Nettle, and G. Roberts, “Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting,” Biology Letters, Vol.2, pp. 412-414, 2006.

[2] T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, T. Ono, M. Imai, and R. Nakatsu, “Development and evaluation of an interactive humanoid robot ‘Robovie.’,” Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA2002), pp. 4166-4173, Washington, DC, USA, May, 2002.

[3] H. Kobayashi and S. Kohshima, “Unique morphology of the human eye and its adaptive meaning: Comparative studies on external morphology of the primate eye,” Journal of human evolution., Vol.40, No.5, pp. 419-435, 2001.

[4] H. Kozima, C. Nakagawa, and H. Yano, “Attention coupling as a prerequisite for social interaction,” IEEE Int. Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 109-114, San Francisco, CA, USA, Oct., 2003.

[5] H. Luczak, M. Roetting, and L. Schmidt “Let’s talk: Anthropomorphization as means to cope with stress of interacting with technical devices,” Ergonomics, Vol.46, pp. 1361-1374, 2003.

[6] S. R. Madden, M. J. Franklin, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong, “The design of an acquisitional query processor for sensor networks,” ACM SIGMOD, pp.491-502, Jun., 2003.

[7] N. Mukawa, A. Fukayama, T. Ohno, M. Sawaki, and N. Hagita, “Gaze Communication between Human and Anthropomorphic Agent,” Proc. of IEEE Int. Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 366-370, Bordeaux-Paris, France, Sep., 2001.

[8] Y. Nishida, H. Aizawa, T. Hori, N. Hoffman, T. Kanade, and M. Kakikura, “3D ultrasonic tagging system for observing human activity,” Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS2003), pp. 785-791, Las Vegas, USA, Oct., 2003.

[9] H. Osawa, J. Mukai, and M. Imai, “Anthropomorphization of an object by displaying robot,” Proc. of IEEE Int. Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Hatfield, United Kingdom, Sep., 2006.

[10] H. Osawa, J. Mukai, and M. Imai, “Acquisition of subjective representation using body parts by an object,” IEEE Workshop on Int. Conf. on Cognitive Science 2006, Vancouver, Canada, Jul., 2006.

[11] B. Reeves and C. Nass, “The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places,” Univ. of Chicago Press, 1996.